Home U.S. Coin Forum

1961 Proof Sets Question

morgandollar1878morgandollar1878 Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭✭✭

Anyone here ever seen a 1961 proof set or other proof set about the same time period that was a "Double" set? The bottom left corner of the envelope even stated that it was a double set. I saw it at an auction today, and I have never seen one before. I thought that it was pretty interesting, and maybe I should have bid higher but I backed out at $70. I got a few other decent items so it was a good day anyway.

Instagram: nomad_numismatics

Comments

  • mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Never ever seen one, never heard of one.
    You're sure it wasn't a 1961 mint set that someone typed on the envelope?
    I'm assuming it was OGP? Or perhaps represented as such?

  • morgandollar1878morgandollar1878 Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It was the OGP, and it had 1962 P.C. at the bottom left hand corner along with the number 2.

    Instagram: nomad_numismatics
  • mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have never seen a set like that.

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,352 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nor I. Sounds like a misdescription of something.

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • WoodenJeffersonWoodenJefferson Posts: 6,491 ✭✭✭✭

    1961 P.C. (Proof Coins) Brown envelope, flat pack, Philadelphia return address, 1 coin set
    1961 Mint set brown flat pack with just code 12 or 28 Washington D.C. return address, 2 coin set P-D
    1962 P.C. (Proof Coins) Brown envelope, flat pack, Philadelphia return adress.
    1962 U.C. (Uncirculated Coins) White envelope, flat pack, San Fransico return address, 2 coin set P-D

    Not quite sure what year because you mention 61 and 62, but there are a slew of 'after market' envelopes available so confusion can reign along with general psychosis. Anyway, for those years, proofs only came in a single flat pack containing proof examples of each denomination, the uncirculated in a 2 insert flat pack representing P and D Mints.

    Anyway, at $70 it was way over bid for either year or either set.

    Chat Board Lingo

    "Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen
  • DollarAfterDollarDollarAfterDollar Posts: 3,214 ✭✭✭✭✭

    New one to me.

    If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
  • CameonutCameonut Posts: 7,309 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Never seen that - and I've looked at hundreds and hundreds of sets.

    “In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson

    My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,239 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have not seen anything like that. There were double mint sets until 1958 after which the Uncirculated coins were placed in poly packs which allowed easy viewing of both sides of the coins. The cardboard holders of previous years showed only one side of the coins.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • PTVETTERPTVETTER Posts: 5,978 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I agree with all the above post each has merit

    Pat Vetter,Mercury Dime registry set,1938 Proof set registry,Pat & BJ Coins:724-325-7211


  • morgandollar1878morgandollar1878 Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have seen a lot of proof sets and mint sets from the late 50's and early 60's and have never seen a proof set like this. I wish I had been the winning bidder for the darned thing, but the price was just getting out of hand At $70 it was almost double bid price for two proof sets. If I had been the winning bidder I would have had pics to go along with my original post, and obviously pictures always help.

    Instagram: nomad_numismatics
  • morgandollar1878morgandollar1878 Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @WoodenJefferson said:
    1961 P.C. (Proof Coins) Brown envelope, flat pack, Philadelphia return address, 1 coin set
    1961 Mint set brown flat pack with just code 12 or 28 Washington D.C. return address, 2 coin set P-D
    1962 P.C. (Proof Coins) Brown envelope, flat pack, Philadelphia return adress.
    1962 U.C. (Uncirculated Coins) White envelope, flat pack, San Fransico return address, 2 coin set P-D

    Not quite sure what year because you mention 61 and 62, but there are a slew of 'after market' envelopes available so confusion can reign along with general psychosis. Anyway, for those years, proofs only came in a single flat pack containing proof examples of each denomination, the uncirculated in a 2 insert flat pack representing P and D Mints.

    Anyway, at $70 it was way over bid for either year or either set.

    Sorry, accidentally posted 1962 in that second comment. It was indeed a 1961 like I stated in my original post. So it had 1961 P.C. and the number "2"

    Instagram: nomad_numismatics
  • WoodenJeffersonWoodenJefferson Posts: 6,491 ✭✭✭✭

    I suspect a 'secondary' envelope to replace OGH which only adds to the confusion.

    Chat Board Lingo

    "Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen
  • morgandollar1878morgandollar1878 Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @WoodenJefferson said:
    I suspect a 'secondary' envelope to replace OGH which only adds to the confusion.

    The print on the envelope looked like the others, but I suppose you can copy anything. I appreciate the insight, I guess I never thought about it being a copy or aftermarket envelope.

    Instagram: nomad_numismatics
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,432 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Never trust envelopes from that era. They were stock envelopes with stock letterpress printing. Exact duplicates were made by aftermarket printers who sold them to collectors and dealers who wanted "fresh" envelopes for their sets. Variety envelopes would have been very easy to make. A member of my coin club back in the 1980's made these replacement envelopes and they were exact duplicates of what the mint used.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • segojasegoja Posts: 6,136 ✭✭✭✭

    Without a pic I can't confirm with certainty, but the mint did put 2 sets in 1 envelope if you ordered 2 sets. There is nothing special about it. The sets themselves are single sets just as you would expect in a single set. Just 2 of them in the envelop.

    Worth bid per set, unless there was something special in a set.

    JMSCoins Website Link


    Ike Specialist

    Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986

    image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file