Home U.S. Coin Forum

Poll - Have you ever read the RedBook cover to cover

I have, but not the new MegaRed

Comments

  • lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 43,893 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes, but not in years, before they greatly expanded it. (Last time I read it cover to cover there were no color photos, for example.)



    Haven't gotten my hands on MegaRed yet, though since I just gave my 2016 edition to my young twin nephews, maybe it's time for that.



    Maybe that's what I'll ask ol' Santy Claws for, later.

    Explore collections of lordmarcovan on CollecOnline, management, safe-keeping, sharing and valuation solution for art piece and collectibles.
  • WingedLiberty1957WingedLiberty1957 Posts: 2,992 ✭✭✭✭✭
    when i was a kid I did ... 1967 or so

    i was fascinated by the commemorative half dollars (which i had never even heard of)
    and esp their super low mintages compared with all the other coins of the 20th century
  • thebeavthebeav Posts: 3,923 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: WingedLiberty1957
    when i was a kid I did ... 1967 or so


    This....

    My fascination was Cal gold....
  • oih82w8oih82w8 Posts: 12,611 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes, but it has been a while...back when it was much thinner...1970's
    oih82w8 = Oh I Hate To Wait _defectus patientia_aka...Dr. Defecto - Curator of RMO's

    BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
  • TPRCTPRC Posts: 3,814 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes, in 1997

    Tom

  • CommemKingCommemKing Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I usually stop at the modern commems.
  • I have but the shorter, thinner version.
    Thomas King
  • LanLordLanLord Posts: 11,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes, a couple times (that is if you will forgive the fact that I didn't actually read the pages that have copyright dates and that information). Otherwise, yes - all the way through.



    But not the megared, I use that one for weight lifting.

  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,621 ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, though it is researched cover to cover several dozen times per week. And there's always something new to learn, and ___ knows, it's impossible to memorize and there's a million things that ain't in it. I'm beginning to love the research more than the coins. image But , it's hard on the eyes. Reading, searching. Re-reading, researching.
  • yes, but a long time ago.
  • RockyMtnProspectorRockyMtnProspector Posts: 754 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yep, first Red Book in 1988.
    GSAs, OBW rolls, Seated, Walkers. Anything old and Colorado-focused, CO nationals.



    Gonna get me a $50 Octagonal someday. Some. Day.
  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 29,282 ✭✭✭✭✭
    no, but have thumbed thru it several times
  • joeykoinsjoeykoins Posts: 17,571 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: johnny9434
    no, but have thumbed thru it several times


    I think this reply speaks for the majority? Including myself.
    Read every page? wow! That's dedication!image

    "Jesus died for you and for me, Thank you,Jesus"!!!

    --- If it should happen I die and leave this world and you want to remember me. Please only remember my opening Sig Line.
  • goldengolden Posts: 9,996 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes, back in 1962 when I got my first Red Book.
  • crazyhounddogcrazyhounddog Posts: 14,071 ✭✭✭✭✭
    A very long time ago when I was a lad. I'm old as dirt now.
    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
  • gsa1fangsa1fan Posts: 5,566 ✭✭✭
    I bought my first in 2002. It looks like momas cook book now I use it for reference so much. The newer ones untouched/unread pretty much!
    Avid collector of GSA's.
  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,752 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Cumulatively, over all these years........YES.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • CameonutCameonut Posts: 7,384 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: thebeav

    Originally posted by: WingedLiberty1957

    when i was a kid I did ... 1967 or so





    This....



    My fascination was Cal gold....




    Me too - but a little earlier than 1967.



    “In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson

    My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!

  • seanqseanq Posts: 8,735 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: thebeav

    Originally posted by: WingedLiberty1957

    when i was a kid I did ... 1967 or so





    This....



    My fascination was Cal gold....




    This again. My favorites were the overdates in the large cents and early halves.



    Sean Reynolds
    Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.

    "Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
  • mvs7mvs7 Posts: 1,662 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Not in one sitting... my first one was handed down from my dad - 9th edition, and I went through it in a matter of a week or so. I still have it and really wish I could get coins at those prices!
  • DollarAfterDollarDollarAfterDollar Posts: 3,215 ✭✭✭✭✭
    God no. It's a reference, not a novel.
    If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
  • BaleyBaley Posts: 22,663 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes, as a 10 year old, I read and studied my 1977 edition until it literally fell apart.

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • TommyTypeTommyType Posts: 4,586 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm sure I devoured it when I first bought a copy....



    But more fun than that was when I page-for-page compared a 1963 copy to a current copy (early 90's). The information had hardly changed at all, but the language had been updated extensively. I'm sure the 1963 text was probably mostly a holdover from the early days....late 40's, early 50's.



    We tend to think that language is static. But the old fashioned prose of the early days was dramatically different than "current" English.
    Easily distracted Type Collector
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes...years ago....not in one sitting though.... did it in units, by coin type. I use the Mega Red for reference... no time to go through that page by page. Cheers, RickO
  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Not me, NEVER. The Redbook contains some great info and is possibly the first "coin book" most of us started with. However, I can think of no reason to read it cover to cover - even now.
  • joeykoinsjoeykoins Posts: 17,571 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: Insider2
    Not me, NEVER. The Redbook contains some great info and is possibly the first "coin book" most of us started with. However, I can think of no reason to read it cover to cover - even now.


    image To me, going through an entire redbook, would be like reading the entire dictionary.

    "Jesus died for you and for me, Thank you,Jesus"!!!

    --- If it should happen I die and leave this world and you want to remember me. Please only remember my opening Sig Line.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file