Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Guess the grade (51 Mays RC)

addicted2ebayaddicted2ebay Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
No wrinkles, creases or pin holes. The top two corners are slightly touched.

image

image

Comments

  • LarkinCollectorLarkinCollector Posts: 8,975 ✭✭✭✭✭
    6-7 Is that one of the sets that there's no deduction for the wax stain? If not, likely an ST qualifier for the back.
    Who is the Golf Card Guy?
  • TheMick6TheMick6 Posts: 582
    5
  • TheMick6TheMick6 Posts: 582
    Think those corners are touched enough that it's a 5 5.5 at best but then again I'm
    Judging from a picture
  • HaveLearnedHaveLearned Posts: 121
    Larkin, are there actually sets where there is no deduction in grade for wax stains ? Had not heard of that. Is there some leniency for certain conditions ?
  • DniceDnice Posts: 848
    PSA 5
  • doctorperfectodoctorperfecto Posts: 123 ✭
    9
  • addicted2ebayaddicted2ebay Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: doctorperfecto
    9


    No but I did declare PSA 10 value just in case.
  • LarkinCollectorLarkinCollector Posts: 8,975 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: HaveLearned
    Larkin, are there actually sets where there is no deduction in grade for wax stains ? Had not heard of that. Is there some leniency for certain conditions ?

    I know there was one mentioned recently that there were no deductions for some sort of stain since all had it. I can't remember if it was 1915 Cracker Jacks or one that was only issued in 1 cent/1 card wax packs. I'll have to do some digging.
    Who is the Golf Card Guy?
  • jay0791jay0791 Posts: 3,544 ✭✭✭✭
    6st
    Collecting PSA... FB,BK,HK,and BB HOF RC sets
    1948-76 Topps FB Sets
    FB & BB HOF Player sets
    1948-1993 NY Yankee Team Sets
  • mexpo75mexpo75 Posts: 1,938 ✭✭✭✭
    7 st
    PackManInNC
  • doctorperfectodoctorperfecto Posts: 123 ✭
    Originally posted by: addicted2ebay





    Not a bad idea
  • LarkinCollectorLarkinCollector Posts: 8,975 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: LarkinCollector
    Originally posted by: HaveLearned
    Larkin, are there actually sets where there is no deduction in grade for wax stains ? Had not heard of that. Is there some leniency for certain conditions ?

    I know there was one mentioned recently that there were no deductions for some sort of stain since all had it. I can't remember if it was 1915 Cracker Jacks or one that was only issued in 1 cent/1 card wax packs. I'll have to do some digging.

    Thinking it was the 1914 Cracker Jacks since those were only issued loose in the box, 1915 had an option to purchase the full set.
    Who is the Golf Card Guy?
  • mlbfan2mlbfan2 Posts: 3,115 ✭✭✭
    That's a PRO 10 all day.
  • travis ttravis t Posts: 1,185 ✭✭✭
    EX-MT 6 w/a Grouch qualifier.
  • 1980scollector1980scollector Posts: 2,036 ✭✭✭
    7ST
    ** Working on the following sets-2013 Spectra Football Hall of Fame 50th Anniversary Autograph set, 2015 Spectra Football Illustrious Legends Autograph set, 2014-15 Hall of Fame Heroes autograph set. **
  • RyanAdmirerRyanAdmirer Posts: 632 ✭✭
    6
    I'm a big Nolan Ryan fan OK???!!!
  • doctorperfectodoctorperfecto Posts: 123 ✭
    Ok 8
  • kingbeeswaxkingbeeswax Posts: 1,423 ✭✭✭
    PSA 5.5 or 6
    rarevintageshirts on ebay auctions link
  • addicted2ebayaddicted2ebay Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭✭
    Here's a hint.... There's no qualifiers. I should have the card back in a day or two. I will post a pic then.
  • kingbeeswaxkingbeeswax Posts: 1,423 ✭✭✭
    Winner gets the card, good deal!!
    rarevintageshirts on ebay auctions link
  • PaulMaulPaulMaul Posts: 4,890 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: doctorperfecto
    9


    Drperfecto for president!!!
    My 1972 Baseball and Wacky Pack Registry Sets
  • ThoseBackPagesThoseBackPages Posts: 4,871 ✭✭
    4
    Big Fan of: HOF Post War RC, Graded RCs
    WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
  • CakesCakes Posts: 3,655 ✭✭✭✭✭
    6.5

    Very nice card btw.
    Successful coin BST transactions with Gerard and segoja.

    Successful card BST transactions with cbcnow, brogurt, gstarling, Bravesfan 007, and rajah 424.
  • 19541954 Posts: 2,905 ✭✭✭
    If I sent it in it would come back a 2 but I think it is a 5 without a qualifier for you
    Looking for high grade rookie cards and unopened boxes/cases
  • secretstashsecretstash Posts: 1,396 ✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: addicted2ebay

    Originally posted by: doctorperfecto

    9




    No but I did declare PSA 10 value just in case.




    lol. this had me laughing out loud brah



    since you notated no qualifiers I say PSA 3. 10 to 1 a qualifier would have been psa 5 or 6 from my experience getting 3 downgrades :S
  • addicted2ebayaddicted2ebay Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭✭
    A 4? Almost pack fresh looking HOF RC card close to 70 years old and it gets a 4.....


    image
  • doctorperfectodoctorperfecto Posts: 123 ✭
    It's very likely a 6ST, rounded down to a 4. Three corners look touched plus the back stain.



    What's the point of covering the cert? VCP offers unlimited numbers to steal if someone is looking.



    Sincerely,

    Dr. Doug P., MD
  • Dpeck100Dpeck100 Posts: 10,912 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: doctorperfecto
    It's very likely a 6ST, rounded down to a 4. Three corners look touched plus the back stain.

    What's the point of covering the cert? VCP offers unlimited numbers to steal if someone is looking.

    Sincerely,
    Dr. Doug P., MD



    Man you learned the card grading scale fast!
  • doctorperfectodoctorperfecto Posts: 123 ✭
    The boards have been very welcoming and helpful. Great group of guys
  • CakesCakes Posts: 3,655 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: Cakes
    6.5

    Very nice card btw.


    The latest pic shows the corner wear that I couldn't see very well in the first.

    I would crack and resubmit a couple of times. I think a 5 could be attainable.

    Successful coin BST transactions with Gerard and segoja.

    Successful card BST transactions with cbcnow, brogurt, gstarling, Bravesfan 007, and rajah 424.
  • BaltimoreYankeeBaltimoreYankee Posts: 3,026 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I was gonna guess 5 but the original pix were kind of small. You can definitively see the softness of the corners in the new (graded) pic. I have a Gil Hodges card that's very similar (even with the wax on back) that got a 5. That's a very nice Mays.
    Daniel
  • originalisbestoriginalisbest Posts: 5,952 ✭✭✭✭
    Slight roughness of the upper left hand corner explains it most to me. Staining on these is pretty common at all mid-grade levels, and I don't believe that's a factor so much as corner wear/soft corners. They can sometimes also appear to be crisp, until you rotate them in a direct light.
Sign In or Register to comment.