Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

How NOT to label your coins.

cmerlo1cmerlo1 Posts: 7,958 ✭✭✭✭✭
A friend of mine bought 5 of these halves from the local B&M a while back. A few of them would probably grade, except that long, long ago someone decided to write numbers on them with a fountain pen. I know it was a fountain pen because the nib scratched the coins in the shape of the numbers- you can see it in places where the ink has come off. Speaking of ink coming off, acetone has no effect on it...

image

image
You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.

Comments

  • lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 43,793 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I had an otherwise lovely Darkside coin that had an old India ink museum number in the field, once, but it wasn't that egregious, and not scratched in! Yow.



    Do you suppose that was done in commerce, like in a bank, rather than by a collector? It's certainly old school and the ink notations may be almost as old as the coins themselves.

    Explore collections of lordmarcovan on CollecOnline, management, safe-keeping, sharing and valuation solution for art piece and collectibles.
  • cmerlo1cmerlo1 Posts: 7,958 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: lordmarcovan
    I had an otherwise lovely Darkside coin that had an old India ink museum number in the field, once, but it wasn't that egregious, and not scratched in! Yow.

    Do you suppose that was done in commerce, like in a bank, rather than by a collector? It's certainly old school and the ink notations may be almost as old as the coins themselves.


    I almost wonder if it isn't pricing, maybe from an old-time dealer. The 1860 looks to have 1.00 on it and the 1858 could be .95.

    You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
  • lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,893 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: cmerlo1

    Originally posted by: lordmarcovan

    I had an otherwise lovely Darkside coin that had an old India ink museum number in the field, once, but it wasn't that egregious, and not scratched in! Yow.



    Do you suppose that was done in commerce, like in a bank, rather than by a collector? It's certainly old school and the ink notations may be almost as old as the coins themselves.




    I almost wonder if it isn't pricing, maybe from an old-time dealer. The 1860 looks to have 1.00 on it and the 1858 could be .95.




    That was my thought too. But I'd never heard of anyone doing such a crazy thing. Write on the envelope or flip, for crying' out loud. Wait...maybe it leaked through the envelope? Nah, you said the nib scratched the coin.

    Lance.
  • TomBTomB Posts: 22,058 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Fountain pen nibs typically aren't that thick and most fountain pen inks don't write well on metal. Also, fountain pen inks are usually water-based, which would make removal relatively easy. However, India ink is a more permanent form of fountain pen ink and that may have been used. Truly, to me these don't look like they were put on the coins by fountain pen, but if you have the nib tracings on them, too, then that is an argument for fountain pen usage.
    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • david3142david3142 Posts: 3,590 ✭✭✭✭✭
    No problem. Those'll buff right out!
  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,313 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Stacks-Bowers had a small group of MS62-65 1859-s halves last year with similar markings on the obv or reverse. They were still very nice looking and fresh coins.
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It certainly does look like .95 and 1.00....perhaps they were sold at a flea market.... junk sellers usually know very little about coins.... Cheers, RickO
  • jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 10,564 ✭✭✭✭✭
    At this photo magnification I cannot see a scratch following the writing and I would bet this was a dealer who marked it with a magic marker. JMO

    Jim

    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • kazkaz Posts: 9,259 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Could have been done with a professional drawing pen, like a Rapidograph (remember those?)
  • crazyhounddogcrazyhounddog Posts: 14,055 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: TomB
    Fountain pen nibs typically aren't that thick and most fountain pen inks don't write well on metal. Also, fountain pen inks are usually water-based, which would make removal relatively easy. However, India ink is a more permanent form of fountain pen ink and that may have been used. Truly, to me these don't look like they were put on the coins by fountain pen, but if you have the nib tracings on them, too, then that is an argument for fountain pen usage.


    I agree with it being India ink. It don't wanna come off. It also looks like one of them says 1.00, like its a price. If that's the case it's laughable.
    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file