1900-S Morgan GTG Update: Grade posted
FadeToBlack
Posts: 7,847 ✭✭✭✭✭
It graded MS64.
Given the price goes something like $500 in 64 to $1500 in 65, I understand the 64 grade on this one, even if I think the surfaces are clean enough and the luster is good enough to go 65. Subpar eye appeal and a spot of weird luster in a primary focal area (cheek area) probably hold it back.
At any rate, at least it's in a problem-free slab, where it belongs, and out of the MS details slab it resided in not too long ago before I cracked and resubbed it.
Looks like 14/43 got it right.
0
Comments
I just got this back from PCGS… after a long break from submitting.
It was graded MS 63+.
I think yours is better.
You did well on the submission though!
Some kind of planchet flaw/damage or a 64.
Looks like a "slider" (AU58).
That's what I thought.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
The ding/mark at her lower lip is a lil distracting . . . My WAG is 65.
HH
1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S.
Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!
I'll post the grade somewhere around 11pm Eastern.
This week or after Easter ?
I'm just not seeing the rub. I do see the usual weak strike over Miss Liberty's ear.
The ding/mark at her lower lip is a lil distracting . . . My WAG is 65.
HH
Same here. It's tough to grade Morgans from pictures, since luster is one of the biggest determining factors and all you have to go on is a static picture. Since the cheek is clean and looks like there is decent luster I said 65 as well.
My YouTube Channel
Nice crack-out. Was it No-Graded for the problem in front of the lips? My grade was MS-64 on this (before I got to the "grade reveal" post), but I agree with others that grading this type of coin from images is often an exercise in futility.
Beats me. I was stunned it bagged the first time.
What was the reason for details? Cleaning, damage? If it was PCGS, there would be a code stating the problem if it didn't have the description on the label.
Awesome!
Sorry bout that.
It graded MS64.
Given the price goes something like $500 in 64 to $1500 in 65, I understand the 64 grade on this one, even if I think the surfaces are clean enough and the luster is good enough to go 65. Subpar eye appeal and a spot of weird luster in a primary focal area (cheek area) probably hold it back.
At any rate, at least it's in a problem-free slab, where it belongs, and out of the MS details slab it resided in not too long ago before I cracked and resubbed it.
Looks like 14/43 got it right.
This one cleaner than many 66s .. grade up value, a hinder ?