Tough to tell from the lighting in those pics...but I'm guessing no. Unless it's one of those dirty grey original high AU's that saw some time in an album.
I like the highlighted gray on the devices against the colorful target toning around the perimeter. I am thinking that SeattleSlammer got it right about how the coin received it's toning.
Am I wrong? On a Morgan, everyone knows it isn't right. On a CBH - toning like this gets described as 'original' all the time. Pet peeve of mine.
Liking a coin with this toning is fine - they can be pretty. It is seller's habits of describing coins like this in a deceiving manner that I find awful.
This is only tangentially related to the OPs original question, so I will end the derail.
Edited: To fix punctuation, capitalization, and because i forgot to make a winky face.
Comments
Don't know if its original or not, not sure anyone here really does
Ike Specialist
Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986
Nice close up pictures on this one
Dipped and retoned -/
Cyanided in the 1940-1950 era and album retoned. Still a nice numismatic piece . .
Just my opinion . . .
Drunner
Dipped and retoned -/
Agreed.
It has the exact look that has become totally acceptable, and basically the norm, for Capped Bust Halves.
it was not done by an expert... if it had been, everyone would be calling it a monster. Cheers, RickO
Dipped and retoned -/
Agreed.
It has the exact look that has become totally acceptable, and basically the norm, for Capped Bust Halves.
My YouTube Channel
Haha!
Am I wrong? On a Morgan, everyone knows it isn't right. On a CBH - toning like this gets described as 'original' all the time. Pet peeve of mine.
Liking a coin with this toning is fine - they can be pretty. It is seller's habits of describing coins like this in a deceiving manner that I find awful.
This is only tangentially related to the OPs original question, so I will end the derail.
Edited: To fix punctuation, capitalization, and because i forgot to make a winky face.