Home› U.S. Coin Forum

Grade me please

Comments

  • Bigbuck1975Bigbuck1975 Posts: 1,276 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I grade it nice ????

    Edit: MS66
  • cmerlo1cmerlo1 Posts: 7,946 ✭✭✭✭✭
    65
    You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
  • georgiacop50georgiacop50 Posts: 2,909 ✭✭✭✭
    Looks 67 from the pic
  • LindeDadLindeDad Posts: 18,766 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Too good to try on a monitor.
    My Current project....https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/mysetregistry/album/160794
  • TommyTypeTommyType Posts: 4,586 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I usually say my grading vocabulary ends at about MS-65....and I'll say it's at least that.



    Only real "issues" are the chatter on the reverse-right field, and maybe some obverse strike shortcomings. But the color probably trumps those....So I'll venture outside my comfort zone, and call it a 66.....
    Easily distracted Type Collector
  • jclovescoinsjclovescoins Posts: 1,936 ✭✭✭✭✭
    63-4
  • MonsterCoinzMonsterCoinz Posts: 1,518 ✭✭✭✭✭
    65.
    www.MonsterCoinz.com | My Toned Showcase

    Check out my iPhone app SlabReader!
  • clarkbar04clarkbar04 Posts: 4,976 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks like it has tons of luster and eye appeal. Should be an easy 66.
    MS66 taste on an MS63 budget.
  • jerseycat101jerseycat101 Posts: 1,360 ✭✭✭✭✭
    66
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,683 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It looks to be Mint State with not big marks. There are few hits on the eagle's legs on the reverse, and some small ticks in the fields.

    Start at MS-65, and hope for MS-66 if you send it in. Grading high grade coins from photos is dicey, but I think that the coin is worth sending in for grading.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,596 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'd grade it as "high eye-appeal". So far as numerical grade goes I am reluctant to grade coins with that type of toning without having them in hand.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • CuKevinCuKevin Posts: 1,736 ✭✭✭✭
    65
    Zircon Cases - Protect Your Vintage Slabs www.ZirconCases.com
    Choice Numismatics www.ChoiceCoin.com

    CN eBay

    All of my collection is in a safe deposit box!
  • COINS MAKE CENTSCOINS MAKE CENTS Posts: 1,861 ✭✭✭✭✭
    65
    New inventory added daily at Coins Make Cents
    HAPPY COLLECTING


  • SamByrdSamByrd Posts: 3,131 ✭✭✭✭
    from what can be seen.

    ms64+/ms65
  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,669 ✭✭✭✭✭
    MS 65 shot at 66.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • dlmtortsdlmtorts Posts: 743 ✭✭✭
    Depends. There is discolorization on the obverse from just above the temple down the cheek to the jaw. If that is rub, this coin looks to be around 63. If that is a part of the toning pattern, then the obverse appears superb, and I would guess 66+. The reverse may hold it back a bit because of the hits on the legs. I would grade the reverse as 64-65. The wonderful toning may get a bump up by 1 point. So overall, if the dark area on the cheek/jaw is toning and not rub, I would think 65-66, with 66 being more likely.
  • sparky64sparky64 Posts: 7,041 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'd also start at 65 and hope for the best.

    Great luster may carry it.



    I would be extremely happy to have one that looks like that.

    "If I say something in the woods and my wife isn't there to hear it.....am I still wrong?"

    My Washington Quarter Registry set...in progress

  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,771 ✭✭✭✭✭
    This is a tough date to grade- the chin looks to have a hit that in my view limits the grade to a 65 and possibly a 65 plus because of the eye appeal

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • ModCrewmanModCrewman Posts: 4,041 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Beautiful coin. I'd call it a 66+.
  • CommemKingCommemKing Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭✭✭
    MS66. Nice coin.
  • JCLIGHTBRIGADEJCLIGHTBRIGADE Posts: 378 ✭
    Originally posted by: ModCrewman
    Beautiful coin. I'd call it a 66+.



    +1,

    64's-65's are all day long coins from my experience ,

    and this one looks 66 and them some so I'd say 66+/67
  • jcpingjcping Posts: 2,649 ✭✭✭
    65 to me
    an SLQ and Ike dollars lover
  • MICHAELDIXONMICHAELDIXON Posts: 6,568 ✭✭✭✭✭
    66
    Spring National Battlefield Coin Show is April 3-5, 2025 at the Eisenhower Hotel Ballroom, Gettysburg, PA. WWW.AmericasCoinShows.com
  • DollarAfterDollarDollarAfterDollar Posts: 3,215 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Hits on the legs limit it to MS 64 for me.

    If the color is less dark, it's got great color!!!

    If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
  • joebb21joebb21 Posts: 4,764 ✭✭✭✭✭
    66
    may the fonz be with you...always...
  • fivecentsfivecents Posts: 11,207 ✭✭✭✭✭
    MS66
  • dogwooddogwood Posts: 1,935 ✭✭✭✭
    I can't see those hits on the eagle legs holding it back. I just completed a
    Washington .25 box of 20, mostly PC66 and they excuse worse than this 32 has on a 6.
    But from an image on an iPhone screen all I can do is speculate.
    Pretty coin.
    We're all born MS70. I'm about a Fine 15 right now.
  • Bob1951Bob1951 Posts: 268 ✭✭
    Toned coins are trickier to grade I guess 64.
  • DoubleEagle59DoubleEagle59 Posts: 8,375 ✭✭✭✭✭
    At the very least, an ms66.
    "Gold is money, and nothing else" (JP Morgan, 1912)

    "“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)

    "I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
  • fastfreddiefastfreddie Posts: 2,893 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: LindeDad

    Too good to try on a monitor.




    65+

    It is not that life is short, but that you are dead for so very long.
  • LeeBoneLeeBone Posts: 4,557 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Washies have made me scratch my head after seeing how they graded compared to what I would have guessed. Taking this into consideration I think this is a nice 64 coin because of the hits on the legs as pointed out by DollarAfterDoll..
    I do really like it though image
  • dpooledpoole Posts: 5,940 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Beautiful look and luster. Hits on the chin and legs, as have been pointed out. 65, in my book.

    Here's a warning parable for coin collectors...



  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,636 ✭✭✭✭✭
    65

    My YouTube Channel

  • crazyhounddogcrazyhounddog Posts: 14,042 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm in the 66 crowd . Just as pretty as can be. Great score my friend!!image
    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
  • goldengolden Posts: 9,972 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: ModCrewman
    Beautiful coin. I'd call it a 66+.


    image
  • braddickbraddick Posts: 24,634 ✭✭✭✭✭
    MS67

    peacockcoins

  • SamByrdSamByrd Posts: 3,131 ✭✭✭✭
    the reason I think the coin is a 64+/65 is on the chin is a good hit and under the tone there are some marks as well on the cheek.

    I love the coin and would want that one in my collection any day of the week over a bright white 67. It is a wonderful example of a hard year to find so attractive.

    It would be good to see a different image and I am curious what grade it is in PCGS view.
  • gripgrip Posts: 9,962 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thanks all for the opinions. Maybe I should have looked closer before sending
    to the bay. Live and learn regardless ones age.
  • JCLIGHTBRIGADEJCLIGHTBRIGADE Posts: 378 ✭
    What is that near the I in "In" and the first T in trust? I see a curved line, almost looks like an eye lash?
  • SamByrdSamByrd Posts: 3,131 ✭✭✭✭
    .
  • davewesendavewesen Posts: 6,613 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I grade it GEM

    It is difficult for me to put a number score on GEM without holding in hand.

    There's one just like it on eBay
    http://www.ebay.com/itm/1932-W...933:g:zt0AAOSwv9hW5hk8
  • SamByrdSamByrd Posts: 3,131 ✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: davewesen
    I grade it GEM

    It is difficult for me to put a number score on GEM without holding in hand.

    There's one just like it on eBay
    http://www.ebay.com/itm/1932-W...933:g:zt0AAOSwv9hW5hk8


    yes there sure is , and the bidders are serious too.image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...