Home› Precious Metals

GIVEAWAY!

derrybderryb Posts: 36,823 ✭✭✭✭✭
in Precious Metals
Free, delivered raw 1963 Franklin half dollar to the forum member who posts a photo in this thread of the lowest serial number on a promo ebay/RCM 10 oz. silver bar. Photo must include handwritten name of member's forum ID to ensure authenticity.





Contest ends midnight EST Feb. 8. Other prize donors are encouraged to join in.

"Interest rates, the price of money, are the most important market. And, perversely, they’re the market that’s most manipulated by the Fed." - Doug Casey

Comments

  • GRANDAMGRANDAM Posts: 8,517 ✭✭✭✭✭
    imageimageimageimageimage
    GrandAm :)
  • 3keepSECRETif2rDEAD3keepSECRETif2rDEAD Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Count me in...Thanks!
  • JohnnyCacheJohnnyCache Posts: 1,761 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The special ebay PM's appear to have sold out, as there are none currently available for sale.



    The listing for RCM silver bars indicate: 0 available / 6,010 sold

    The bar I received today has a serial # in the 7000 - 8000 range.

    Charles III Album

    Charles III Portrait Set

    Charles IV Album

    Charles IV Portrait Set

    Spanish Colonial Pillar Set

  • tincuptincup Posts: 5,141 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Well... that gives me 1 out of 6010 chances to win!!
    ----- kj
  • GRANDAMGRANDAM Posts: 8,517 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Well it appears to me that they are shipping these bars starting from the highest serial number and working their way down.



    I picked up my bars today and they are all in the low 9,0000 numbers.



    GrandAm :)
  • RyansRustRyansRust Posts: 179 ✭✭✭
    I rec'd my bars on Sat. in the 6k and 7k range and bought bar 30 something and 900 range.
  • davewesendavewesen Posts: 6,142 ✭✭✭✭✭
    ordered when 2980 sold



    [URL=http://s918.photobucket.com/user/e1cnr/media/e1cnr002/DSCF20272_zps0ptlb3cq.jpg.html]image[/URL]
  • Coin FinderCoin Finder Posts: 7,166 ✭✭✭✭✭
    How many did they make?
  • 3keepSECRETif2rDEAD3keepSECRETif2rDEAD Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I got 3 today...have 5 more coming tomorrow. The 3 I got today have slightly lower numbers that the one pictured here so far. I agree with the assessment that they are starting high and moving lower for later orders. Can't blame them as it's just bullion but for this giveaway, it may be the last order received before Feb 8th that wins the contest image
  • RyansRustRyansRust Posts: 179 ✭✭✭
    They did not say. But with what's sold and with what's left, that's 7010. A 8000 bar has shown up so at least that many. Maybe 9k? Bar 000001 was held back BPM told me. Maybe ebay/BPM kept the first so many to pass out to employees and they have another batch to add to inventory.

    BPM President stated that other metals and sizes were a possibility in the future.


    Originally posted by: thebigeng
    How many did they make?


  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,137 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Just got my eBay bars. Serial numbers are in the 9000 range so I guess I'm out of the running. Oh, well. At least I got my silver bars unlike a lot of people who recently bought from Bullion Direct.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,293 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Rec'd 4 numbered closer to 10,000 than 00000
  • PRECIOUSMENTALPRECIOUSMENTAL Posts: 961 ✭✭✭✭
    Picture did not come out well, then was ready with lighting and batts. died...GRRRRRR.

    SN is 6584, will try again tomorrow.
  • 3keepSECRETif2rDEAD3keepSECRETif2rDEAD Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭✭✭
    image




    My lowest was in the 71xx range so I'll just post a pic of my new 8-pack instead. Thanks to OP in the US coins forum for starting the thread that showed these were for sale! Thanks also to OP here for running a cool giveaway contest image
  • RyansRustRyansRust Posts: 179 ✭✭✭
    image







    I just noticed rules state note must be handwritten. If I get close to winning I'll change the pic. Hard to think that this is the lowest bar so far. I was hoping to get a under 100 bar. Bought around the 34th. Ordered again at 900 and rec'd 7733 I think it is. Think I'll order again.
  • derrybderryb Posts: 36,823 ✭✭✭✭✭
    totally acceptable pic Ryan

    "Interest rates, the price of money, are the most important market. And, perversely, they’re the market that’s most manipulated by the Fed." - Doug Casey

  • RyansRustRyansRust Posts: 179 ✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: derryb
    totally acceptable pic Ryan


    Ok thanks. Looking at other boards, surprised I have not heard of any low numbers yet.

  • derrybderryb Posts: 36,823 ✭✭✭✭✭
    low numbers still sitting in boxes at RCM. As they struck them they stacked them. Last struck on the top of the pile.

    "Interest rates, the price of money, are the most important market. And, perversely, they’re the market that’s most manipulated by the Fed." - Doug Casey

  • CuKevinCuKevin Posts: 1,723 ✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: derryb
    low numbers still sitting in boxes at RCM. As they struck them they stacked them. Last struck on the top of the pile.


    Unless they made 1 stack approximately 10,000 bars tall, that doesn't make any sense. If they stacked them in more reasonable piles as they went, we should see more randomness than just bars over 6,000. This requires some intentional choices of which bars to send out first. We also see enough diversity in the numbers to predict that they are allocating them into shipping groups which they can then choose randomly from.
    Zircon Cases - Protect Your Vintage Slabs www.ZirconCases.com
    Choice Numismatics www.ChoiceCoin.com

    CN eBay

    All of my collection is in a safe deposit box!
  • davewesendavewesen Posts: 6,142 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: CuKevin
    Originally posted by: derryb
    low numbers still sitting in boxes at RCM. As they struck them they stacked them. Last struck on the top of the pile.


    Unless they made 1 stack approximately 10,000 bars tall, that doesn't make any sense. If they stacked them in more reasonable piles as they went, we should see more randomness than just bars over 6,000. This requires some intentional choices of which bars to send out first. We also see enough diversity in the numbers to predict that they are allocating them into shipping groups which they can then choose randomly from.


    maybe they put 50 into a box, and then stacked the boxes while putting 80 boxes on a pallet, and then stacked the pallets....
  • CuKevinCuKevin Posts: 1,723 ✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: davewesen
    Originally posted by: CuKevin
    Originally posted by: derryb
    low numbers still sitting in boxes at RCM. As they struck them they stacked them. Last struck on the top of the pile.


    Unless they made 1 stack approximately 10,000 bars tall, that doesn't make any sense. If they stacked them in more reasonable piles as they went, we should see more randomness than just bars over 6,000. This requires some intentional choices of which bars to send out first. We also see enough diversity in the numbers to predict that they are allocating them into shipping groups which they can then choose randomly from.


    maybe they put 50 into a box, and then stacked the boxes while putting 80 boxes on a pallet, and then stacked the pallets....


    This is much more likely. It would also explain why we are seeing such a distribution of numbers but all greater than approx. 6,000.
    Zircon Cases - Protect Your Vintage Slabs www.ZirconCases.com
    Choice Numismatics www.ChoiceCoin.com

    CN eBay

    All of my collection is in a safe deposit box!
  • BochimanBochiman Posts: 25,381 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: CuKevin

    Originally posted by: davewesen

    Originally posted by: CuKevin

    Originally posted by: derryb

    low numbers still sitting in boxes at RCM. As they struck them they stacked them. Last struck on the top of the pile.




    Unless they made 1 stack approximately 10,000 bars tall, that doesn't make any sense. If they stacked them in more reasonable piles as they went, we should see more randomness than just bars over 6,000. This requires some intentional choices of which bars to send out first. We also see enough diversity in the numbers to predict that they are allocating them into shipping groups which they can then choose randomly from.




    maybe they put 50 into a box, and then stacked the boxes while putting 80 boxes on a pallet, and then stacked the pallets....





    This is much more likely. It would also explain why we are seeing such a distribution of numbers but all greater than approx. 6,000.






    Likely the first grouping either put away (gifts, specials, whatnot....since they already removed 000001).



    I was also thinking the "stacking" as above......they come off the line, go into boxes, boxes go into storage/onto pallets, get put in back. Next one comes and goes just in front of the earlier one. Rinse and repeat. Maybe the very last ones were put into an additional stack (say, double or triple stacked) and haven't been gotten to yet?



    Anyway, it's reasonable that no really low numbers have been sent out yet if they do it LIFO style.

    I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment

  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,293 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Could we assume the " first ever " batch will be numbered eb000000 to eb999999 ? Just one shy of a million 10 ounce bars image
  • BochimanBochiman Posts: 25,381 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Here's why people haven't been receiving low serial numbers.....they have been holding them back and want more $$$ for them...



    54AAOSwKtlWotcs">ebay link

    I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment

  • OPAOPA Posts: 17,121 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: Bochiman
    Here's why people haven't been receiving low serial numbers.....they have been holding them back and want more $$$ for them...

    54AAOSwKtlWotcs">ebay link


    Anyone can list an item for what they feel it's worth, but getting the price, is another story. So far, no fool has purchased one at his asking price. In addition, I don't consider those low numbered bars.

    "Bongo drive 1984 Lincoln that looks like old coin dug from ground."
  • ConstantineConstantine Posts: 2,368 ✭✭✭
    My number is 3762 and I was towards the end of ordering (1/21) although they did list more after I bought.
  • davewesendavewesen Posts: 6,142 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: Bochiman
    Here's why people haven't been receiving low serial numbers.....they have been holding them back and want more $$$ for them...

    54AAOSwKtlWotcs">ebay link


    They have feedback as a buyer from baypreciousmetals. I suspect they bought many and just got them.
  • RyansRustRyansRust Posts: 179 ✭✭✭
    I can assure you that is not the case. This was BPM's idea to get ebay/RCM together and they are the only ones selling these direct. They are a huge company that does major volume and are not messing around with stunts like that. The previous poster hit the nail on the head that anyone else selling them rec'd them from BPM. Minus the first bar (confirmed by BPM) that was held back and possibly more (in my opinion).

    Originally posted by: Bochiman
    Here's why people haven't been receiving low serial numbers.....they have been holding them back and want more $$$ for them...

    54AAOSwKtlWotcs">ebay link


  • BBNBBN Posts: 3,761 ✭✭✭
    I just got 2942 today. Pic to follow soon.

    Positive BST Transactions (buyers and sellers): wondercoin, blu62vette, BAJJERFAN, privatecoin, blu62vette, AlanLastufka, privatecoin

    #1 1951 Bowman Los Angeles Rams Team Set
    #2 1980 Topps Los Angeles Rams Team Set
    #8 (and climbing) 1972 Topps Los Angeles Rams Team Set
  • BBNBBN Posts: 3,761 ✭✭✭
    image

    Positive BST Transactions (buyers and sellers): wondercoin, blu62vette, BAJJERFAN, privatecoin, blu62vette, AlanLastufka, privatecoin

    #1 1951 Bowman Los Angeles Rams Team Set
    #2 1980 Topps Los Angeles Rams Team Set
    #8 (and climbing) 1972 Topps Los Angeles Rams Team Set
  • DrBusterDrBuster Posts: 5,379 ✭✭✭✭✭
    getting lower
  • OPAOPA Posts: 17,121 ✭✭✭✭✭
    # 1465....


    photo DSCN1116_zpshpy4xch4.jpg
    "Bongo drive 1984 Lincoln that looks like old coin dug from ground."
  • BBNBBN Posts: 3,761 ✭✭✭
    wow. Nice score!

    Positive BST Transactions (buyers and sellers): wondercoin, blu62vette, BAJJERFAN, privatecoin, blu62vette, AlanLastufka, privatecoin

    #1 1951 Bowman Los Angeles Rams Team Set
    #2 1980 Topps Los Angeles Rams Team Set
    #8 (and climbing) 1972 Topps Los Angeles Rams Team Set
  • davewesendavewesen Posts: 6,142 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I figured some more would be delivered today and a new leader emerge...
  • derrybderryb Posts: 36,823 ✭✭✭✭✭
    OPA takes the prize. PM me a mailing address.

    "Interest rates, the price of money, are the most important market. And, perversely, they’re the market that’s most manipulated by the Fed." - Doug Casey

  • OPAOPA Posts: 17,121 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: derryb
    OPA takes the prize. PM me a mailing address.


    It's not often that I win in anything...Thanks again.image
    "Bongo drive 1984 Lincoln that looks like old coin dug from ground."
  • jmski52jmski52 Posts: 22,850 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Congrats, OPA! Class Act, derryb!
    Q: Are You Printing Money? Bernanke: Not Literally

    I knew it would happen.
Sign In or Register to comment.