Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Standing Liberty Quarter Types - I, II and III or I, IIa and IIb

oih82w8oih82w8 Posts: 12,057 ✭✭✭✭✭
I have been a firm believer that the Standing Liberty Quarter series should have the recessed dates of 1925 thru 1930 listed as Type III. I was doing some looking on Collectors.com and they have three Type categories for the SLQ; Type 1, Type 2a and Type 2b.



Just curious what the other forum members thought.



Type I, II and III



Type 1, 2a and 2b



Don't Care / Doesn't Matter
oih82w8 = Oh I Hate To Wait _defectus patientia_aka...Dr. Defecto - Curator of RMO's

BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore...

Comments

  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,657 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I thought that this has been accepted for a long time. The three types are on the NGC type coin registry.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    oih82w8oih82w8 Posts: 12,057 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Which one?



    (Roman Numerals vs. Arabic is not the deciding factor) Type 2a & 2b or Type 2 & 3



    This is what I found in the NGC Standing Liberty Quarter Registry



    Coins in Category









    1916 STANDING 25C MS



    1917 TYPE 1 25C MS



    1917 D TYPE 1 25C MS



    1917 S TYPE 1 25C MS



    1917 TYPE 2 25C MS



    1917 D TYPE 2 25C MS



    1917 S TYPE 2 25C MS



    1918 25C MS



    1918 D 25C MS



    1918 S 25C MS



    1918/7 S 25C MS



    1919 25C MS



    1919 D 25C MS



    1919 S 25C MS



    1920 25C MS



    1920 D 25C MS



    1920 S 25C MS



    1921 25C MS



    1923 25C MS



    1923 S 25C MS



    1924 25C MS



    1924 D 25C MS



    1924 S 25C MS



    1925 25C MS



    1926 25C MS



    1926 D 25C MS



    1926 S 25C MS



    1927 25C MS



    1927 D 25C MS



    1927 S 25C MS



    1928 25C MS



    1928 D 25C MS



    1928 S 25C MS



    1929 25C MS



    1929 D 25C MS



    1929 S 25C MS



    1930 25C MS



    1930 S 25C MS



    https://www.ngccoin.com/coi......-quarters-pscid-37
    oih82w8 = Oh I Hate To Wait _defectus patientia_aka...Dr. Defecto - Curator of RMO's

    BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore...
  • Options
    TommyTypeTommyType Posts: 4,586 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Think Bill is saying the TYPE COIN registry requirements are for 3 separate SLQ's.



    (Quoting the list):



    25C STANDING LIBERTY, TYPE 1 (1916-1917)

    25C STANDING LIBERTY, TYPE 2, (1917-1924)

    25C STANDING LIBERTY, TYPE 3 (1925-1930)



    So, in answer to your question, they've gone with Type 1, 2, and 3 versus 2a/2b.

    Easily distracted Type Collector
  • Options
    oih82w8oih82w8 Posts: 12,057 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Do you think our host will recognize the third type?



    Another layer in NGC's registry...thanks TommyType & Bill



    http://coins.www.collectors-so...x?CategoryID=4&sets=us
    oih82w8 = Oh I Hate To Wait _defectus patientia_aka...Dr. Defecto - Curator of RMO's

    BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore...
  • Options
    jcpingjcping Posts: 2,649 ✭✭✭
    Actually, type 2a and type 2b have been used on 1921 SLQ already. If you are a true SLQ expert, you should know 1921 is the transition year that there are two different edge designs. Since it is minor and J. Cline tried to promote it but it did not go too far since 1921 SLQ quantity is limited.
    an SLQ and Ike dollars lover
  • Options
    messydeskmessydesk Posts: 19,797 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Since it's almost W-2 season, I think it should be Type B, Type C, and Type 2.
  • Options
    oih82w8oih82w8 Posts: 12,057 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: jcping

    Actually, type 2a and type 2b have been used on 1921 SLQ already. If you are a true SLQ expert, you should know 1921 is the transition year that there are two different edge designs. Since it is minor and J. Cline tried to promote it but it did not go too far since 1921 SLQ quantity is limited.




    I am far from being an expert in any series...it's just my observation.



    (RIP J.H. Cline - 08 Jan 2015 image)
    oih82w8 = Oh I Hate To Wait _defectus patientia_aka...Dr. Defecto - Curator of RMO's

    BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore...
  • Options
    MFHMFH Posts: 11,720 ✭✭✭✭

    I have always felt that the initial year, 1916 should be considered as Type 1.
    ....the differences between 1916 and 1917 are enough to classify them separately.

    1917 - No Stars Under Eagle - Type 2

    1917 - 1924 - Type 3

    1925 - 1930 - Type 4
    Mike Hayes
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Coin collecting is not a hobby, it's an obsession !

    New Barber Purchases
  • Options
    mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: MFH



    I have always felt that the initial year, 1916 should be considered as Type 1.

    ....the differences between 1916 and 1917 are enough to classify them separately.



    1917 - No Stars Under Eagle - Type 2



    1917 - 1924 - Type 3



    1925 - 1930 - Type 4




    I agree with this.
  • Options
    oih82w8oih82w8 Posts: 12,057 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I can agree with this as well, but there would be far few collectors who could obtain one of the 52,000 mintage of the 1916...even fewer, if you consider those that have disappeared through wear, loss or even worse damaged.
    oih82w8 = Oh I Hate To Wait _defectus patientia_aka...Dr. Defecto - Curator of RMO's

    BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore...
  • Options
    BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I also agree with MFH's four types.



    This 1916 is an entirely different design struck in very low relief compared to the bare breasted 1917's.



    If you think about it although the low mintage is mentioned for having been issued at the end of the year.



    It's more so a pattern issued to see how the general public would feel about the design.



    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • Options
    SonorandesertratSonorandesertrat Posts: 5,695 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: Broadstruck
    I also agree with MFH's four types.

    This 1916 is an entirely different design struck in very low relief compared to the bare breasted 1917's.

    If you think about it although the low mintage is mentioned for having been issued at the end of the year.

    It's more so a pattern issued to see how the general public would feel about the design.



    image
    Member: EAC, NBS, C4, CWTS, ANA

    RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'

    CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file