You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
Why doesn't somebody post a picture of one of the finished tokens?
Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
Went out and found this ex-Oechsner piece for you Tom. Not only is the above the first die trail of this type I've seen, the below is the first TrueView variety of its kind I've seen:
Thanks for the information (in the now deleted post). It's good to know that the die trial may not be genuine after an in-hand inspection and that more investigation would be useful.
Now, what was in the deleted post? Could somebody send me a direct?
Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
Here's my overlay. It's clearly the same device. Whether it's the same die is a more difficult question. The trial could not have been struck after the token; as grounding down the dentils and date (either selectively or not) would either yield wildly uneven fields or loss of much of the design.
So before then? Check the device punch, then add date and dentils, perhaps lathing the die down to size first? Personally I cannot rule it out. But the trial looks to be struck from a die that is rusted (though since I suspect the Conder design was lathed down on the punch side, I don't want to say anything definitive). So I wouldn't be confident in saying that the piece is a device punch trial from the same die as the token. So perhaps from a second die? Who knows; I'd have to say I'm not sure what to make of it.
I'm gonna ttt this. Plus, thinking about it a bit more, I notice the punch trial shows nothing indicative of a possible edge to the die.
At least one Feuchtwanger die has a much wider mid-section than at the token face. Is it possible that the die, when made, had a much wider face that was able to strike this die trial, before being cut down to a smaller token face?
Just ran across the Stack's auction for this which has photos that are much clearer on the under type. This is the same Ex-Rossa & Tanenbaum, Byron White, and Samuel Berngard specimen.
Comments
Now thats uberrkewel!
You took the words right outta my mouth.!!!
.
CoinsAreFun Toned Silver Eagle Proof Album
.
Gallery Mint Museum, Ron Landis& Joe Rust, The beginnings of the Golden Dollar
.
More CoinsAreFun Pictorials NGC
Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
"Coin collecting for outcasts..."
Now, what was in the deleted post? Could somebody send me a direct?
Now, what was in the deleted post?
A quick summary is that a forum member made an in-hand inspection with a loupe in 2008 and questions remained about whether the die trial was genuine.
There was a request to do an image overlay with a struck specimen for comparison which seems reasonable and worthwhile.
So before then? Check the device punch, then add date and dentils, perhaps lathing the die down to size first? Personally I cannot rule it out. But the trial looks to be struck from a die that is rusted (though since I suspect the Conder design was lathed down on the punch side, I don't want to say anything definitive). So I wouldn't be confident in saying that the piece is a device punch trial from the same die as the token. So perhaps from a second die? Who knows; I'd have to say I'm not sure what to make of it.
Ed. S.
(EJS)
Ed. S.
(EJS)
I'm gonna ttt this. Plus, thinking about it a bit more, I notice the punch trial shows nothing indicative of a possible edge to the die.
At least one Feuchtwanger die has a much wider mid-section than at the token face. Is it possible that the die, when made, had a much wider face that was able to strike this die trial, before being cut down to a smaller token face?
Old Thread Update
Just ran across the Stack's auction for this which has photos that are much clearer on the under type. This is the same Ex-Rossa & Tanenbaum, Byron White, and Samuel Berngard specimen.
This is a R8 with a pop 0/1/0 ATS:
2008 Stack's Photos
Whatever this is, it is AWESOME.
Does anyone here own this beauty?
Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
"Coin collecting for outcasts..."