Something I never do. Cracked a PCGS AU53 1874-CC Trade $1, here is the results. Need a Trade $1 exp


Got an upgrade to AU55

Thanks for another great image Phil.....that's a tough one to capture.
Coin description from seller: Beautiful coin-Golden olive and semi PL-Superb eye appeal
Tough date with very little distractions
Question for the forum.
Is it possible that I have the Micro cc MM?
Whether or not, an upgrade to 55 of a CC Trade $1 is quite exciting.
There are 6 different mintmarks for the 1874-CC
From CoinFacts: Circulation strikes: Varieties of mintmark sizes have been chronicled as follows:
1. Micro cc: Breen-5786. Mintmark. 74 mm high; .75 mm spacing between C's. Rare.
2. Minute CC: Mintmark .84 mm high; .4 mm spacing between C's.
3. Minute CC: Mintmark .9 mm high; .75 mm spacing between C's.
4. Medium CC: Mintmark 1.1 mm high; .55 mm spacing between C's. Dot on 8 of date on obverse.
5. Medium CC: Mintmark 1.1 mm high; .6 mm spacing between C's. Slight doubled die on reverse.
6. Tall CC: Mintmark 1.17 mm high; .6 mm spacing between C's.
CoinFact Link
0
Comments
Edit: Almost forgot, congrats on the upgrade!
mbogoman
https://pcgs.com/setregistry/collectors-showcase/classic-issues-colonials-through-1964/zambezi-collection-trade-dollars/7345Asesabi Lutho
<< <i>This thread does not have an alert to our resident expert TDN??????? >>
I'm not a variety expert - but I do know it's not the widely spaced micro cc
The one you want to talk to is Keoj. The MM here looks the same size as other "minute CC" varieties I've seen. I'm not sure there actually is a "micro CC" that exists. Breen was not always accurate, especially in his estimates of rarity. I've seen a lot of these with the close C's out there.
Here's an example of the wide cc's for comparison of MM size.
My YouTube Channel
Dan, I hope that Keoj sees this thread and reports on the existence of the micro CC.
ebaybuyer, I disagree with your comment. Most folks are just trying to help and learn.
keoj
<< <i>The number of dies used in the production of 1874-CC's is daunting. Tall and small CC's and I've counted 18 dies used to date. Many of them are very similar to one another so it is difficult to ascertain the rarity of each. The no-period one that you show is pretty scarce but not extremely rare. A notable rarity, as Dan described, is the very wide CC variety (1.2 mm separation of the CC's). This die was used in the production of 1873, 1874 and 1876 coinage with 1874 being the most rare (they are all rare). Hope this helps......nice coin!!!!!
keoj >>
It certainly does help keoj.
Your knowledgeable input is much appreciated, and I hope others realize that we are blessed to have such experts on this forum to answer our coin questions.
Thanks Timbuk3.
Mike
"Seu cabra da peste,
"Sou Mangueira......."