Sharing my cards
SamBarnes72
Posts: 41
Clemente and Williams. I do not have rookies of either card.
0
Comments
Collecting Unopened from '72-'83; mostly BBCE certified boxes/cases/racks.
Prefer to buy in bulk.
Can we see less per pic and more pics?
There's a lot of goodies hidden in those stacks.
Thanks for sharing.
Jim
Arthur
i need one of those 63 roses!!! i'll take the most banged up beater if ya feel like trading....and i didn't notice a 65 rose in there either. if ya have an extra, i'd be interested in one of those as well
i need to trade something from the childhood collection to complete a part of the childhood collection, so would like to keep "money" outta the equation. if that's something that appeases ya, shoot me a pm.
and nice display, tastes and cards, btw!!
Nice collection! Let's see some Mantle's
<< <i>Hi, welcome!
Nice collection! Let's see some Mantle's
Baseball, it is said, is only a game. True. And the Grand Canyon is only a hole in Arizona.
-George F. Will
Arthur
What, only one Ryan RC among all that duplication? Slacker.
That is an incredibly impressive series of photos.
Collecting Unopened from '72-'83; mostly BBCE certified boxes/cases/racks.
Prefer to buy in bulk.
Don't waste your time and fees listing on ebay before getting in touch me by PM or at gregmo32@aol.com !
The understatement of the year. LOL. Oh but I have 8 '53 Robinson's, 5 '56 Mantle's, 5 Rookie Koufax's etc. You know, just laying around.
ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
collecting RAW Topps baseball cards 1952 Highs to 1972. looking for collector grade (somewhere between psa 4-7 condition). let me know what you have, I'll take it, I want to finish sets, I must have something you can use for trade.
looking for Topps 71-72 hi's-62-53-54-55-59, I have these sets started
Lets see those football. What a great collection
Collecting Unopened from '72-'83; mostly BBCE certified boxes/cases/racks.
Prefer to buy in bulk.
Doug
Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
<< <i>Speechless!!! >>
So isn't the OP lol
<< <i>
<< <i>Speechless!!! >>
So isn't the OP lol >>
I sent one of my nicer Mantles in to PSA for rating services. I am awaiting the results.
Jk, sweet collection. I'm a big fan of collecting multiples, or hoarding as some would call it lol.
ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
2 1 24585115 NEAR MINT 7 1969 Topps 260 Reggie Jackson Card
3 1 24585116 MINT 9 1969 Topps 500 Mickey Mantle Last Name in Yellow Card
Thanks,
David (LD_Ferg)
1985 Topps Football (starting in psa 8) - #9 - started 05/21/06
<< <i>1 1 24585114 EXCELLENT-MINT+ 6.5 1968 Topps 177 Mets Rookies J.Koosman/N.Ryan Card
2 1 24585115 NEAR MINT 7 1969 Topps 260 Reggie Jackson Card
3 1 24585116 MINT 9 1969 Topps 500 Mickey Mantle Last Name in Yellow Card >>
Wow!
Well done!
GEM-MT 10: Gem Mint
A PSA Gem Mint 10 card is a virtually perfect card. Attributes include four perfectly sharp corners, sharp focus and full original gloss. A PSA Gem Mint 10 card must be free of staining of any kind, but an allowance may be made for a slight printing imperfection, if it doesn't impair the overall appeal of the card. The image must be centered on the card within a tolerance not to exceed approximately 55/45 to 60/40 percent on the front, and 75/25 percent on the reverse.
The card is perfect in every way. Really thought it was a 10!? My disappointment is mounting.
<< <i>According to their website that Mickey Mantle should be a 10.
GEM-MT 10: Gem Mint
A PSA Gem Mint 10 card is a virtually perfect card. Attributes include four perfectly sharp corners, sharp focus and full original gloss. A PSA Gem Mint 10 card must be free of staining of any kind, but an allowance may be made for a slight printing imperfection, if it doesn't impair the overall appeal of the card. The image must be centered on the card within a tolerance not to exceed approximately 55/45 to 60/40 percent on the front, and 75/25 percent on the reverse.
The card is perfect in every way. Really thought it was a 10!? My disappointment is mounting. >>
Great collection...tough to get the grades you think your cards deserve...we've all been there..never know when there might be a small surface or printing thing going on...good luck with your other grades..
<< <i>According to their website that Mickey Mantle should be a 10.
The card is perfect in every way. Really thought it was a 10!? My disappointment is mounting. >>
congrats, sam! and welcome to our world...can I get ya your first beer?
rest in knowing that they simply just don't hand out mantle 10's. some of the most submitted cards from every set and while it's probably more than deserving, there are probably politics involved as well...
vcp has the card right at $4450, but a recorded sale hasn't been for close to a year...no telling w/ todays market.
basic 9's simply don't surface too often and 10's aren't even in the proverbial haystack.
so, not a bad start. be happy!
<< <i>A PSA 9 Mantle is a huge card! >>
Correct, don't feel too bad. You hit a big card there.
ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
<< <i>Curious on why you only subbed 3 cards? >>
I don't understand the question. What is curious about 3 cards?
<< <i>According to their website that Mickey Mantle should be a 10.
GEM-MT 10: Gem Mint
A PSA Gem Mint 10 card is a virtually perfect card. Attributes include four perfectly sharp corners, sharp focus and full original gloss. A PSA Gem Mint 10 card must be free of staining of any kind, but an allowance may be made for a slight printing imperfection, if it doesn't impair the overall appeal of the card. The image must be centered on the card within a tolerance not to exceed approximately 55/45 to 60/40 percent on the front, and 75/25 percent on the reverse.
The card is perfect in every way. Really thought it was a 10!? My disappointment is mounting. >>
Grading is a learning process. When you get the card back, posts big, clear scans and we can tell you what downgraded it. Useful information for future submissions.