Home U.S. Coin Forum

March of Dimes mintage

ernie11ernie11 Posts: 1,961 ✭✭✭✭✭
If the March of Dimes set is being limited to 75,000, does that mean the Roosevelt Dimes in the set are the lowest mintage for regular issue dimes since the 1894-S?

Comments

  • illini420illini420 Posts: 11,466 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Not quite... every proof dime from 1895-1951 has a mintage under 75,000 as well.

    The two dimes in the March of Dimes set are proofs as well, one regular proof and one reverse proof, so I would guess that some would say those aren't "regular issue" anyways, but then again, neither was the 1894-S.



  • Type2Type2 Posts: 13,985 ✭✭✭✭✭
    For the mod issue they are low. Even better then the 96-W.


    Hoard the keys.
  • wondercoinwondercoin Posts: 16,982 ✭✭✭✭✭
    How about the 1964 SMS Roosevelt Dime with an estimated mintage of a couple dozen? As "regular issue" as the 1894-S?

    Wondercoin
    Please visit my website at www.wondercoins.com and my ebay auctions under my user name www.wondercoin.com.
  • claychaserclaychaser Posts: 4,406 ✭✭✭✭
    I think that its not an apples to apples comparison to compare coins struck 50 - 100 years ago and released into commerce to modern coins that will be virtually 100% saved. For the 1916-D dime, mintage was 264,000. According to Coin Facts, the estimated survivors is 10,000. I'd like to know if that 10,000 coin estimate includes only gradable coins or excludes problem and damaged coins, but its still an indication. A wholesome AG 1916-D dime will set you back around $500. At 7.5 x the estimated survivors of the 16-D, a logarithmic projection from 75,000 down to 10,000 and a $500 value would yield what value? Any math gnerds out there? image


    ==Looking for pre WW2 Commems in PCGS Rattler holders, 1851-O Three Cent Silvers in all grades



    Successful, problem free and pleasant transactions with: illini420, coinguy1, weather11am,wayneherndon,wondercoin,Topdollarpaid,Julian, bishdigg,seateddime, peicesofme,ajia,CoinRaritiesOnline,savoyspecial,Boom, TorinoCobra71, ModernCoinMart, WTCG, slinc, Patches, Gerard, pocketpiececommems, BigJohnD, RickMilauskas, mirabella, Smittys, LeeG, TomB, DeusExMachina, tydye
  • lasvegasteddylasvegasteddy Posts: 10,408 ✭✭✭
    75,000 with a survival rate of 100%
    isn't all that

    1894-s...hmmm
    better
    how about the...1873-CC 10C No Arrows dime to name one
    everything in life is but merely on loan to us by our appreciation....lose your appreciation and see


  • VanHalenVanHalen Posts: 4,156 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>If the March of Dimes set is being limited to 75,000, does that mean the Roosevelt Dimes in the set are the lowest mintage for regular issue dimes since the 1894-S? >>



    As noted above, probably not. Low mintage dimes? You betcha and the first reverse proof dime ever to boot.

    At $60 a pop they'll make for great birthday/Christmas gifts as well. image
  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 33,662 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I think that its not an apples to apples comparison to compare coins struck 50 - 100 years ago and released into commerce to modern coins that will be virtually 100% saved. For the 1916-D dime, mintage was 264,000. According to Coin Facts, the estimated survivors is 10,000. I'd like to know if that 10,000 coin estimate includes only gradable coins or excludes problem and damaged coins, but its still an indication. A wholesome AG 1916-D dime will set you back around $500. At 7.5 x the estimated survivors of the 16-D, a logarithmic projection from 75,000 down to 10,000 and a $500 value would yield what value? Any math gnerds out there? image >>




    You need a couple of data points**, then ask about 75,000 if you want to talk about a curve.

    When you are talking only 1 point to another, you are reduced to a only being able to solve using a ratio no matter the shape of the graph there.

    500/7.5 is 66 & 2/3


    One more data point that isn't close to 10k and 500 nor 75k, plus the assumption of a exponential decay, would give us enough info to wing a very bad guess. image

    **(The rule is 3 data points minimum are needed for a curve, but I don't want to tax brains for data points)


    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • ernie11ernie11 Posts: 1,961 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Not quite... every proof dime from 1895-1951 has a mintage under 75,000 as well. >>



    Ah, good point, thank you.
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It will be a long time before these attain any significant value.... I just want to pair the W dimes and have the first reverse proof dime...I like anomalies....Cheers, RickO
  • JeffMTampaJeffMTampa Posts: 3,292 ✭✭✭✭✭
    You guys haven't taken something into consideration- the USPS will loose about 80% of the sets in transit- the remaining 2015 W 10 will have an estimated survival of 15,000 coins. image
    I love them Barber Halves.....
  • leothelyonleothelyon Posts: 8,473 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>You guys haven't taken something into consideration- the USPS will loose about 80% of the sets in transit- the remaining 2015 W 10 will have an estimated survival of 15,000 coins. image >>



    If the dealers and flippers would stop stocking up on these US Mint products and just let them get lost through the public. It's just pure greed these low mintage products don't gain any worthy value.

    The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!

    My Jefferson Nickel Collection

  • Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 11,543 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>If the dealers and flippers would stop stocking up on these US Mint products and just let them get lost through the public. It's just pure greed these low mintage products don't gain any worthy value. >>


    I agree with the 'pure greed' part of it - but I also think that if it weren't for the dealers and flippers, they wouldn't already have the value they have.
    Once the dust settles and the <10,000 (my wild guess; there appear to be only a few hundred reg sets) Roosy dime collectors each have them, there will be plenty left over for the speculators and hoarders.



    Successful BST transactions with 171 members. Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 33,662 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I have another account that did not make a purchase on these.


    today it received an email from the mint stating the MoD set is still available but on backorder. image

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • This is a bit late for this discussion but in the Roosevelt Dime series 75,000 is really small especially since there is no quantity for circulation. Not everyone will be sending them in for NGC or PCGS grading which will cut that slabbed quantity available. The slabbed ones not stored properly will spot etc. The day will come but maybe not in our lifetime the Roosevelt Dime series will end making them more desirable. 76 years is a pretty long run that's pretty much full retirement age and then some! A young collector/investor could probably do pretty good setting a few of these aside. That's just my opinion!

  • RampageRampage Posts: 9,487 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Garfield2022 said:
    This is a bit late for this discussion but in the Roosevelt Dime series 75,000 is really small especially since there is no quantity for circulation. Not everyone will be sending them in for NGC or PCGS grading which will cut that slabbed quantity available. The slabbed ones not stored properly will spot etc. The day will come but maybe not in our lifetime the Roosevelt Dime series will end making them more desirable. 76 years is a pretty long run that's pretty much full retirement age and then some! A young collector/investor could probably do pretty good setting a few of these aside. That's just my opinion!

    I don't disagree. I have a couple of full sets of the silver issues 1964 and before (not the modern silver issues). Whenever I see them in the junk box 90 percent, and they are clearly uncs, I will buy them and just put them in flips. I figure I have little downside on them.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file