Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Gambling never pays

I've never played the crack and resubmit game, but I was recently rounding out a submission so I cracked and submitted a Rod Carew NM 7 (MK). I honestly couldn't see a mark anywhere on it, so I thought it might grade without a MK qualifier. Popped yesterday:

N8: MISCUT 1967 Topps 569 A.L. Rookies R.Carew/H.Allen

Comments

  • mrmint23mrmint23 Posts: 2,249 ✭✭✭
    Is the Carew for sale?
  • OAKESY25OAKESY25 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭
    just send it back in.. I just got hammered on a crack out sub

    and I mean crushed. not even funny
    seems to be happening often on high profile cards
  • Resub. At least you weren't charged!
  • MrVintageMrVintage Posts: 1,027 ✭✭✭
    I have had my fair share of wins and losses in the crack and submit game. My favorite was an older label psa 9 Rickey Henderson 1980 topps rookie that I cracked and subbed. It came back a psa 7 so I then cracked and subbed to BGS and it came back a 9.....LOL. Good luck if you try and resub the Carew!!!!
  • 1966CUDA1966CUDA Posts: 2,007 ✭✭✭✭
    I had a Ryan rookie come back miscut 3 times before it graded on the 4th submission.


  • << <i>Is the Carew for sale? >>



    Not for sale. It belongs in one of my 67 sets.
  • DboneesqDboneesq Posts: 18,219 ✭✭
    I would also give it another sub and see what happens. With a card like that, even if it takes a couple more submissions you unfortunately have to try. GOOD LUCK!!!
    STAY HEALTHY!

    Doug

    Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
  • mrmint23mrmint23 Posts: 2,249 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Is the Carew for sale? >>



    Not for sale. It belongs in one of my 67 sets. >>



    Thanks..Would have been a great card to get signed.
  • psychumppsychump Posts: 1,378 ✭✭✭
    What a racket!
    Tallulah Bankhead — 'There have been only two geniuses in the world. Willie Mays and Willie Shakespeare.'
  • EstilEstil Posts: 7,083 ✭✭✭✭
    WISHLIST
    D's: 54S,53P,50P,49S,45D+S,44S,43D,41S,40D+S,39D+S,38D+S,37D+S,36S,35D+S,all 16-34's
    Q's: 52S,47S,46S,40S,39S,38S,37D+S,36D+S,35D,34D,32D+S
    74T: 37,38,47,151,193,241,435,570,610,654,655 97 Finest silver: 115,135,139,145,310
    73T:31,55,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,80,152,165,189,213,235,237,257,341,344,377,379,390,422,433,453,480,497,545,554,563,580,606,613,630
    95 Ultra GM Sets: Golden Prospects,HR Kings,On-Base Leaders,Power Plus,RBI Kings,Rising Stars
  • mlbfan2mlbfan2 Posts: 3,115 ✭✭✭
    I thought this thread was going to be about the Duke game on Friday night. link
  • ClockworkAngelClockworkAngel Posts: 1,994 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I thought this thread was going to be about the Duke game on Friday night. link >>



    Now THAT was crazy. The common thing you hear on that is that Vegas lost because of that call and that supposedly everyone had their money on Duke, but I heard quite a bit more money was on Utah. All the college kids with their $50 bets had Duke, but there were some sharps on Utah
    The Clockwork Angel Collection...brought to you by Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Chase
    TheClockworkAngelCollection
  • seebelowseebelow Posts: 1,643 ✭✭✭
    Espn said the casinos actually lost millions on that...for once.

    Do you guys sense they're becoming stricter in their grading vs years ago? sounds like it.
    Interested in higher grade vintage cards. Aren't we all. image
  • You should have 4SC submit it for you. It will come back an 11.....image
  • Stone193Stone193 Posts: 24,437 ✭✭✭✭✭
    From (MK) to (MC)...

    Next up (ST).
    Mike
  • ClockworkAngelClockworkAngel Posts: 1,994 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Espn said the casinos actually lost millions on that...for once.

    Do you guys sense they're becoming stricter in their grading vs years ago? sounds like it. >>



    Yes I feel they are without a doubt.
    The Clockwork Angel Collection...brought to you by Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Chase
    TheClockworkAngelCollection
  • BaltimoreYankeeBaltimoreYankee Posts: 3,025 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm with psychump on this one.

    Amazing how people just say, "resubmit until it comes back the way you want it". The card was already graded by PSA, who determined it was not miscut. Now all of a sudden it is, but if you resubmit it, perhaps several times, maybe it wont be miscut any more. Tennis, anyone?
    Daniel
  • Third time's a charm…I guess



    EXCELLENT 5 1967 Topps 569 A.L. Rookies R.Carew/H.Allen
  • JoeBanzaiJoeBanzai Posts: 11,944 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The miscut qualifier REALLY bothers me, I had several cards over the course of three submissions get rejected as miscut and they ALL got grades the next time.



    2013,14 and 15 Certificate Award Winner Harmon Killebrew Master Set and Master Topps Set
  • LittletweedLittletweed Posts: 623 ✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: JTB
    Third time's a charm…I guess

    EXCELLENT 5 1967 Topps 569 A.L. Rookies R.Carew/H.Allen


    That's a bummer. I've played the crack-n-sub game and sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.

    Did you ask for no qualifiers? Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't a 7(mk) = 5 NQ?

    Either way, I bet it's a good looking card. How about a scan?
    Matt

  • addicted2ebayaddicted2ebay Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭✭
    I cracked out a 65 Namath PSA 4 that I thought looked Mint (some wax stains I think kept the grade low) . A very minute piece of plastic from the slab dented the card when I put it in a screw down holder to send in for grading??. I was so upset that I screwd up the card, anyhow I sent it in to be graded and it came back a 6??. I can only imagine if that small speck did not dent the card. 7, 8??
  • begsu1013begsu1013 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭
    ok, gotta explain the screw down holder....



    going w/ the new submitter, playing dumb route?
  • addicted2ebayaddicted2ebay Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭✭
    I used a screw down because of the size of the 65 card. It's the only way I could send it in with any protection.
  • begsu1013begsu1013 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭
    gotcha! attention to details, bob. attention to details.
  • addicted2ebayaddicted2ebay Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭✭
    I agree cracking out is risky. I destroyed a 54 aaron last week. Sh@t happens ??
  • SidePocketSidePocket Posts: 2,901 ✭✭✭
    I had 4 previously graded cards come back MIN SIZE. Go figure.

    "Molon Labe"

  • maddux69maddux69 Posts: 2,150 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I wonder who would have the cojones to crack out a low grade, high dollar card rather than crossing it over. On one hand you have the opportunity to go $4000 up in value, on the other you can drop $1000 or come back trimmed/altered.
  • miwlvrnmiwlvrn Posts: 4,266 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: addicted2ebay

    I used a screw down because of the size of the 65 card. It's the only way I could send it in with any protection.




    I think you are probably joking. You actually used a CSIV, right?



  • DboneesqDboneesq Posts: 18,219 ✭✭
    Originally posted by: JTB
    Third time's a charm…I guess
    EXCELLENT 5 1967 Topps 569 A.L. Rookies R.Carew/H.Allen





    Glad to see you got it back in a holder. Let's see it when you get it back!


    STAY HEALTHY!

    Doug

    Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
  • grote15grote15 Posts: 29,726 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Straight 5 is pretty much same technical grade as 7 (MK), as most qualified cards will straight grade two grades lower.


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
Sign In or Register to comment.