Gambling never pays
JTB
Posts: 186
I've never played the crack and resubmit game, but I was recently rounding out a submission so I cracked and submitted a Rod Carew NM 7 (MK). I honestly couldn't see a mark anywhere on it, so I thought it might grade without a MK qualifier. Popped yesterday:
N8: MISCUT 1967 Topps 569 A.L. Rookies R.Carew/H.Allen
N8: MISCUT 1967 Topps 569 A.L. Rookies R.Carew/H.Allen
0
Comments
and I mean crushed. not even funny
seems to be happening often on high profile cards
<< <i>Is the Carew for sale? >>
Not for sale. It belongs in one of my 67 sets.
Doug
Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
<< <i>
<< <i>Is the Carew for sale? >>
Not for sale. It belongs in one of my 67 sets. >>
Thanks..Would have been a great card to get signed.
D's: 54S,53P,50P,49S,45D+S,44S,43D,41S,40D+S,39D+S,38D+S,37D+S,36S,35D+S,all 16-34's
Q's: 52S,47S,46S,40S,39S,38S,37D+S,36D+S,35D,34D,32D+S
74T: 37,38,47,151,193,241,435,570,610,654,655 97 Finest silver: 115,135,139,145,310
73T:31,55,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,80,152,165,189,213,235,237,257,341,344,377,379,390,422,433,453,480,497,545,554,563,580,606,613,630
95 Ultra GM Sets: Golden Prospects,HR Kings,On-Base Leaders,Power Plus,RBI Kings,Rising Stars
<< <i>I thought this thread was going to be about the Duke game on Friday night. link >>
Now THAT was crazy. The common thing you hear on that is that Vegas lost because of that call and that supposedly everyone had their money on Duke, but I heard quite a bit more money was on Utah. All the college kids with their $50 bets had Duke, but there were some sharps on Utah
TheClockworkAngelCollection
Do you guys sense they're becoming stricter in their grading vs years ago? sounds like it.
Next up (ST).
<< <i>Espn said the casinos actually lost millions on that...for once.
Do you guys sense they're becoming stricter in their grading vs years ago? sounds like it. >>
Yes I feel they are without a doubt.
TheClockworkAngelCollection
Amazing how people just say, "resubmit until it comes back the way you want it". The card was already graded by PSA, who determined it was not miscut. Now all of a sudden it is, but if you resubmit it, perhaps several times, maybe it wont be miscut any more. Tennis, anyone?
EXCELLENT 5 1967 Topps 569 A.L. Rookies R.Carew/H.Allen
Third time's a charm…I guess
EXCELLENT 5 1967 Topps 569 A.L. Rookies R.Carew/H.Allen
That's a bummer. I've played the crack-n-sub game and sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.
Did you ask for no qualifiers? Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't a 7(mk) = 5 NQ?
Either way, I bet it's a good looking card. How about a scan?
going w/ the new submitter, playing dumb route?
"Molon Labe"
eBay Store
Greg Maddux #1 Master SetGreg Maddux #2 Basic Set
I used a screw down because of the size of the 65 card. It's the only way I could send it in with any protection.
I think you are probably joking. You actually used a CSIV, right?
Third time's a charm…I guess
EXCELLENT 5 1967 Topps 569 A.L. Rookies R.Carew/H.Allen
Glad to see you got it back in a holder. Let's see it when you get it back!
Doug
Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.