Would the spot on this coin......
BAJJERFAN
Posts: 31,097 ✭✭✭✭✭
be a turnoff for you or no biggie because it's circulated and they're usually not perfect? I don't care for the spot.
theknowitalltroll;
0
Comments
Wayne
www.waynedriskillminiatures.com
Atleast its not black just dark grey that blends.
Mike
I wouldn't buy it, but I'm very picky so it probably bothers me more than most.
RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'
CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]
Sure better than a bleached out white circulated coin.
<< <i>A turn-off. Eye appeal is everything and you can find a better example in that grade. >>
<< <i>That's the ONLY thing I see on that coin. >>
When spots are large (such as this one) or in prominent places (again, such as this one), I pass.
And as you know, but probably many don't, that is a very tough coin to find anywhere in that grade range.
Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
sweet coin and for grade
this obverse spot isn't a biggie to me
<< <i>i'll give my opinion when i get to see the reverse too
sweet coin and for grade
this obverse spot isn't a biggie to me >>
reverse pic added, really nice coin but for the spot. At least that's the look I like on my circ Walkers.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
Edited to add spot does bother me on OP.
<< <i>I don't care for the spot. >>
Ditto. I'd pass.
Lance.
<< <i>The 1917-S rev. coin is a real show stopper IMO. Highly under-rated. Priced less than the some of the other 1917 coins but a BEAST to find nice. Had I not purchased the one that I picked up A YEAR AGO---I'd STILL be looking. Looked for YEARS before that. TOUGH COIN!! The S obverse in NO DIFFERENT, as it's tough to find nice, and it's even scarcer and MORE expensive. >>
Maybe so. But I would not include the OP coin in my collection, even as a filler.
Better to do without than to make do.
<< <i>A turn-off. Eye appeal is everything and you can find a better example in that grade. >>
this
<< <i>Whats the deal with the "Obverse" and "Reverse" notations on the slab labels?
Edited to add spot does bother me on OP. >>
In 1917 the Denver and San Francisco mints struck Walker coins where the mint mark was on both the obverse or reverse. In 1916 the mm was on the obverse; in 1918 and after it was on the reverse only.
Examples.
if you're on the fence about buying...maybe they'd net the price some
CAC prefers to see "spots" on its gem gold coins to prove originality. Seems like all silver coins should be discarded if they have "spots." Fwiw, I don't think I've ever owned a toned seated coin in any grade that didn't have spots. Good thing no one here is trying to build a choice VF-AU circ seated quarter set. Most or many of the dates hardly even exist without spots or other "problems." If that were a VF-35 1860-s quarter (or say a more common 1851), the spot would not bother me at all.
"Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.
If it makes you feel better I glanced more at the reverse hologram which is surprisingly fully intact then your spot
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
<< <i>Sold for $376 + shipping. >>
Pretty good deal.....for reference, I sold a raw 17S Obv at FUN to a national dealer for >$100 more. That coin had slightly more meat,
but a less than orginal look with some minor surface issues. Glad that dealer didn't hold out for a pristine example of this common coin
<< <i>I would avoid any coins that have elements of negative eye-appeal. It's time to be very picky about what is acceptable. >>
What he said.