Home U.S. Coin Forum

What will become of the post 2012 S mint clad Washington quarters?

ManorcourtmanManorcourtman Posts: 8,054 ✭✭✭✭✭
In 2012 the US Mint began making America the Beautiful San Fransisco clad quarters in case you weren't aware! The mintages were less than 2 million each in 2012. I have not seen figures for 2013 or 2014 yet but these have not done well on the secondary market. Does anyone have any opinions on these quarters future among collectors? Some will argue the mintages are super low for a modern issue but these low mintages have not translated to price increases. Thoughts?

Comments

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,269 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>In 2012 the US Mint began making America the Beautiful San Fransisco clad quarters in case you weren't aware! The mintages were less than 2 million each in 2012. I have not seen figures for 2013 or 2014 yet but these have not done well on the secondary market. Does anyone have any opinions on these quarters future among collectors? Some will argue the mintages are super low for a modern issue but these low mintages have not translated to price increases. Thoughts? >>



    Mintages for 2013 and 2014 are in the 2015 Redbook.

    I remember when ther 2012's csme out that people were unhappy with the coins in general and the Mint in particular because it ruined everybody's albums and forced them to buy NCLT's to complete their sets. All part of the Mint's new policy of screwing collectors whenever possible.
    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • illini420illini420 Posts: 11,466 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It seems that one reason they haven't caught on because they have never been included in the regular Mint Sets. Still not sure why they haven't been included...

    Only way to get them is to pay a significant premium to the Mint or your local coin dealer. Many collectors don't go for that.

    Also, not sure if the coin albums have spots for these, but that seems to make a difference in collector demand to some degree.

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Seems to be very little interest in these, for the reasons above. In conversation with other collectors, they are either not interested or do not care... Cheers, RickO
  • pf70collectorpf70collector Posts: 6,672 ✭✭✭
    I bought all the 2012 S rolls, but stopped afterward.

    Here's the final 2012-s quarter mintages

    El Yunque - Rolls 16,961 - Bags 10,017 - Total Mintage 1,680,140
    Chaco - Rolls 16,528 - Bags 7,279 - Total Mintage 1,389,020
    Acadia - Rolls 17,093 - Bags 7,254 - Total Mintage 1,409,120
    Volcanoes - Rolls 17,478 - Bags 7,100 - Total Mintage 1,409,120
    Denali - Rolls 17,668 - Bags 7,025 - Total Mintage 1,409,220
    Above from cointalk


    Could these be compared to the 1983 P Quarter at 673,535,000 mintage. Unlike the 1983 P there will be plenty of high grade mint state examples of the 2012 S.

    Also the 2012s are only 3.5 times the mintage of the lowest minted 1932 D at 408,000

    The 1983 P Quarter is at 673,535,000 mintage and can only be found in bags rolls and souvenir mint sets sold only at the Denver and Philly Mints.

    From 1983 P Quarter

    This month's coin is the 1983-P Washington Quarter, already a treasure to those who understand its current scarcity. The 1983-P Quarter is particularly scarce because no Mint Sets were released in 1983. To find high-grade coins, collectors must sort through rolls, bags or Souvenir Sets. Souvenir Sets are available for purchase only to visitors of the Denver and Philadelphia Mints. Because of the way they are distributed, many fewer sets are available to collectors than traditional Mint Sets. Other sources of 1983-P Quarters, such as original rolls and mint bags, seem to not have been saved by collectors at the time. As a result, most of the original mintage was likely released into general circulation.

    I don't think the 2012s will gain much in value in my lifetime, but I think there is the possibility of lower mintages of 1.5 million of the S quarters as collectors may ignore them in future years. The ATB series is due to end in 2021.
  • ManorcourtmanManorcourtman Posts: 8,054 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Seems to be very little interest in these, for the reasons above. In conversation with other collectors, they are either not interested or do not care... Cheers, RickO >>




    This is one reason the S mint Washies my be a serious sleeper to be awakened years from now. Maybe, maybe not! Just thinking out loud.
  • OverdateOverdate Posts: 7,034 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Only way to get them is to pay a significant premium to the Mint or your local coin dealer. Many collectors don't go for that. >>


    The premium (at least for 100-coin bags) is not that high. At $34.95 per bag, the price is only about 35 cents per coin. Not bad for a low-mintage modern, even if it's not popular or well-known at the moment.

    I believe some of the 2013s had even lower mintages than the 2012s, somewhere around 1.3 million.

    And much of that mintage is going to roll and mini-bag collectors, leaving fewer single coins for sets.

    My Adolph A. Weinman signature :)

  • jmcu12jmcu12 Posts: 2,452 ✭✭✭
    I think they are sleepers, or at least I hope so. I have purchased a bag of each ever since they were offered.

    I am hoping to be able to retire image

    But seriously I think they could have a decent amount of potential.
    Awarded latest "YOU SUCK!": June 11, 2014
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,689 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I have to believe that when the kids who collected states quarters come back
    to collecting these will be among the first coins they'll want. Demand might never
    be huge but it should be solid.
    Tempus fugit.
  • OverdateOverdate Posts: 7,034 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Buying "S" quarters in bags for 35 cents each is like buying 1950-D nickels for 7 cents each. Maximum downside is to face value, with plenty of upside, especially since mintages of "S" quarters are much lower than the 1950-D nickel mintage.

    My Adolph A. Weinman signature :)

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,388 ✭✭✭✭✭
    They are just another example of unnecessary ultra-moderns that should never have been minted. Ultra-modern mint products have become much like the "sand dune" stamp issues of the 1960s and 1970s. They were issued to drain collectors wallets, not fulfill any actual need.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • illini420illini420 Posts: 11,466 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Only way to get them is to pay a significant premium to the Mint or your local coin dealer. Many collectors don't go for that. >>


    The premium (at least for 100-coin bags) is not that high. At $34.95 per bag, the price is only about 35 cents per coin. Not bad for a low-mintage modern, even if it's not popular or well-known at the moment.

    I believe some of the 2013s had even lower mintages than the 2012s, somewhere around 1.3 million.

    And much of that mintage is going to roll and mini-bag collectors, leaving fewer single coins for sets. >>




    I understand there is limited downside if you're buying a bag of 100 coins. But the average collector isn't hoarding away 100 of each quarter. Most just want one example, or maybe a couple at most. The only option to get one or a few is to pay a significant premium. I've seen individual coins at shows/coin shops usually for $2 each... sometimes as low as $1... but never for $.35.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file