Home U.S. Coin Forum

Whitman Blue Album, Standing Liberty Quarters

So, I've been working on this on and off for 15 years. Some I bought before I knew what I was doing. Those (well at least one) should be apparent and I'm working on replacing them.

Also, it was difficult to get a really good shot of the whole thing. For example, the 1917-P Type 2 is an easy MS63, but the luster is not apparent and it almost looks like it could be cleaned. It's not.

I've shifted from trying to find whiter coins to trying to find darker toned XF coins, which are really, really hard find.

The most expensive coins I've cracked out are in the $600-700 range (1923-S, 1921). I cannot envision a scenario where I'm going to crack out an 8 over 7 or a 1916, so those will either have to be filled with a low grade filler, or simply never filled.

image

image

image

image

image

image

Comments

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,590 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That's the way coins should be collected; no "plastic" or "stickers". It's too bad that the time for that type of collecting seems to have passed.

    The toned coins in your set look very nice. The early Standing Liberty Quarters were always a challenge in the high circulated grades.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 11,624 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Very nice!

    I bought a nearly complete set of these in the same album some years back from my wholesale guy, who got it from an old estate.
    I have no idea how long ago the set was assembled, but some of the coins had toned up beautifully in it.



    Successful BST transactions with 171 members. Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • SilverBlindSilverBlind Posts: 119 ✭✭✭
    Nice set, I like them all. That 17 Var. 1 is a beauty.
    BST References] oilstates2003, GoldCoin98, COINS MAKE CENTS, SurfinxHI, mbogoman, detroitfan2,
  • ChangeInHistoryChangeInHistory Posts: 3,083 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I did a set (almost) 10 years ago in F-12 and better. I lost interest, had other things to collect by the time I was ready for the 1916, 1918/7.

    You're right, finding more original looking ones in VF+, XF is tough. You have a nicely developing XF+ set.
  • seanqseanq Posts: 8,722 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Nice set, I like them all. That 17 Var. 1 is a beauty. >>




    Agreed, I could stare at a set of any early 20th century coins (Barbers, Mercs, SLQs, andc Walkers) in that condition all day.


    Sean Reynolds
    Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.

    "Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
  • bcdeluxebcdeluxe Posts: 209 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Nice set, I like them all. That 17 Var. 1 is a beauty. >>


    Thanks, that was the very first Standing Liberty I ever purchased.

    Many of these have been in the album for 12-15 years and are acquiring some peripheral tone (specifically, the 17-S Ty 1, the 18-S and the 23). The 17-D Ty 1 was totally grey when it got its spot in the album, and is now acquiring a reddish patina. The 1920 is a newer addition, as it is a better match to my intended look. The other 1920 I pulled out and posted in another thread.

    The rest I'm just kind of waiting to see what happens.

    I didn't image page 2, and I don't recall why. I will try to do that next time I have the album.
  • SonorandesertratSonorandesertrat Posts: 5,695 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I put together a full set of ChAU SLQs in a Whitman album during 1973-1995, minus the overdate. I later transferred the coins to a Dansco album and sold them in 2007. It was an enjoyable project. Replacing the Standing Liberty design with the Washington series was a shame.

    Did you buy your coins raw, or have you been removing them from slabs?
    Member: EAC, NBS, C4, CWTS, ANA

    RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'

    CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]
  • BaleyBaley Posts: 22,663 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm absolutely crazy about this style of collecting. Very nice set. I really really like your 1921, would like to see the reverse. Also the 1919 catches my eye, along with several others.

    A few, I can see moving to your "B" set, when they get upgraded. How's that last page coming along?

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • FlatwoodsFlatwoods Posts: 4,246 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I love seeing that. Nice collection.
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Great set and a fantastic way to collect and display coins...Cheers, RickO
  • bcdeluxebcdeluxe Posts: 209 ✭✭✭


    << <i>. . . I really really like your 1921, would like to see the reverse. Also the 1919 . . . >>



    Those are a couple of my favorites as well. And the 1924.

    My photo skills need some work. My images rarely turn out consistent. I am sure a lot of it is my lighting.

    Some of these are undoubtedly headed to a "B" folder.

    image

    image

  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,662 ✭✭✭✭✭
    What a beautiful, well-matched set. Those are really something!! I like them all but the 1919-S is especially pretty. image

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • bcdeluxebcdeluxe Posts: 209 ✭✭✭


    << <i>How's that last page coming along? >>



    It's complete, but is need of replacement coins in several holes. There are a lot of tough coins to find on that second page. The keys in this series - 1916, 1919-S and 1919-D, 1923-S, 1927-S - are far easier to find than a good looking looking 1926-D and S with any type of decent head detail. 1926-D is so notoriously poorly struck, I have never seen anything close to what I'm looking for in a reasonable price range.
  • bcdeluxebcdeluxe Posts: 209 ✭✭✭
    The least attractive coin on this page, IMHO, is the 1918-P. I bought it on ebay from a well known AT doctor (well, I subsequently discovered this on this board). It wasn't incredibly costly (maybe $100), but used to be a nice looking gold color. I had suspected it was AT when I bought it, but was also pretty new to this series, and collecting in general.

    It has turned to whatever you want to call this monstrosity of a Stander now. I'll probably pull it out and throw it in acetone to see what happens, but I am afraid the chemist used both heat and chemicals to do this.
  • rec78rec78 Posts: 5,829 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Congrats on a nice set. That is where my set is, no 1916 or 18/7. Your 1920-D seems well struck. This is a difficult coin as well. The 1920-D was the last one I acquired as it was very hard to find a 1920-D with a well struck date that I liked. The 1923-S also.


    Bob
    image
  • ScootersdadScootersdad Posts: 180 ✭✭✭
    very nice set!

    ready to pull trigger on starting a set
  • Timbuk3Timbuk3 Posts: 11,658 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sweet, I love SLQ !!! image
    Timbuk3
  • DeepCoinDeepCoin Posts: 2,781 ✭✭✭
    I love the 1917 type I, like everyone else. This SLQ thread makes me sad when I think of the passing of J.H. Cline. Did you buy and SLQs from him and I wonder if someone will take over the niche or if the heirs will just liquidate his inventory.
    Retired United States Mint guy, now working on an Everyman Type Set.
  • lasvegasteddylasvegasteddy Posts: 10,408 ✭✭✭
    sweet series and examples here
    congrats
    everything in life is but merely on loan to us by our appreciation....lose your appreciation and see


  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,507 ✭✭✭✭✭
    wtc & wtg


    Way to collect … and way to go.
  • TreashuntTreashunt Posts: 6,747 ✭✭✭✭✭
    nice set.

    I have one like it
    Frank

    BHNC #203

  • SkyManSkyMan Posts: 9,493 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sweet looking set. Raw albums are the way to go.
  • mightyhuntermightyhunter Posts: 478 ✭✭✭
    A very nice set. I prefer this type of collecting over my Registry Set in PCGS boxes. Good luck trying to find a solid XF 1926-D with any kind of a strike. I have one in XF 40 in PCGS plastic but it isn't all that great. Here is a 1918 D that I am fond of. I don't care about the PCGS grade.
    [URL=http://s681.photobucket.com/user/mightyhunter55/media/005-3.jpg.html]image[/URL]
  • bcdeluxebcdeluxe Posts: 209 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I love the 1917 type I, like everyone else. This SLQ thread makes me sad when I think of the passing of J.H. Cline. Did you buy and SLQs from him and I wonder if someone will take over the niche or if the heirs will just liquidate his inventory. >>



    I agree. I never met him but talked to him on the phone a couple times. I have a signed copy of the third edition. That book is a must for anyone collecting this series.

    I notice his website has gone "under construction". He always carried so much in inventory, at least in $ value, I would hope the heirs would continue. He had an eye for SLQs though, so I also wonder if they'll keep it going.

    I was a coin show last week, and of course each dealer asks "What cha looking for?" and my answer is always "Standing Libertys". (or is it Liberties?) Several then said "Did you see that Cline passed away?" Sad indeed.
  • bcdeluxebcdeluxe Posts: 209 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I put together a full set of ChAU SLQs in a Whitman album during 1973-1995, minus the overdate. I later transferred the coins to a Dansco album and sold them in 2007. It was an enjoyable project. Replacing the Standing Liberty design with the Washington series was a shame.

    Did you buy your coins raw, or have you been removing them from slabs? >>



    I bought the 23-S and 21 in an ANACS and ICG holder respectively, and cracked those. The others were purchased raw either at B&Ms in NC, NY, and MI, where my job has taken me, and several on ebay (that's where I've made my biggest mistakes, like that 1918-P). I have a great dealer where I live now and have no problems buying raw, but the issue of actually obtaining them (him getting them in inventory) is the problem. Last month when I was in there, he had a raw 8/7 and a raw 1916. Neither of which was I ready to pull the trigger on. But the overdate was really tempting. It had a nice grey patina and was in VG to VF, so affordable (if you consider buying something like a 5k used car in cash "affordable").
  • luckybucksluckybucks Posts: 1,318 ✭✭✭
    Some of the most beautiful American coins came from that era.

    Nice set !!
  • When I turn pages in my albums, I think about history.

    When I flip thru my slabs, I think about money. image
  • Wabbit2313Wabbit2313 Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Lovely. Your images of the full page are really nice and clear. That is hard to do!
  • bcdeluxebcdeluxe Posts: 209 ✭✭✭
    Added page 2 in the original post. Pics aren't as good. It's my lighting.
  • BaleyBaley Posts: 22,663 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I thinks the second set of pictures are much, much better than the first set.

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • TopographicOceansTopographicOceans Posts: 6,535 ✭✭✭✭
    If it wasn't for the blue Whitman's there would be no coin collectors
    image
  • joecopperjoecopper Posts: 1,195 ✭✭✭
    Just nice coins - I like the darker toned ones as well - they have character.
    17, 17-D, 19 and 21 are beauties.
  • BigDowgieBigDowgie Posts: 1,778 ✭✭✭✭
    Super nice!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file