Home World & Ancient Coins Forum
Options

Question about 1884 Austria 2 Florin

It's been quite a while since I did anything with darkside coins. My local shop owner retired in December and the new owner brought in some world material, including a piece that after doing a double-take, I gave close scrutiny and then purchased this afternoon.

Austria 2-Florin
1884
KM 2233
Mintage: 87,000 (the entire series is VERY low mintage, all things considered)

This coin is in an NGC holder, graded MS62 PL.

Krause does not list any proofs for the date or series, but if I had seen this coin raw, I would have bet my paycheck it is a proof. Cameo frost on devices, full mirrored fields. The lettering has fully squared off edges and there is absolutely no mushiness in the beaded border. Both sides are completely hammered; no strike variance at all.

It just looks too good for a circulation strike of that era.

If not proofs, were there any presentation stikes made? Any modern restrikes?

I haven't had a chance to image it (and I suck at shooting proofs anyway)...

EDIT: According to the NGC pop report, there have been 2 PLs slabbed across the entire series, both dated 1884. This one in 62 and one in 66. If memory serves, unless PCGS has changed their policies, they don't give the PL designation on world coins.

Comments

  • Options
    ZoharZohar Posts: 6,718 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Not sure about official proofs yet there are a few PLs I have seen. Here is my 1884 2FL.

    image
    Habsburg Talers

    TalerUniverse.com is a curated numismatic project dedicated to the silver talers, crowns, and medals of the Habsburg Empire and the Holy Roman Empire, spanning the 16th–18th centuries. The collection emphasizes historically significant issues, rare mint varieties, and high-grade NGC/PCGS examples, presented with detailed historical context, scholarly references, and high-resolution photography. TalerUniverse aims to serve both as a private collection showcase and a growing reference resource for collectors, researchers, and students of early-modern European coinage.
  • Options
    coinpicturescoinpictures Posts: 5,345 ✭✭✭
    Hi Zohar,

    Is yours a circulated grade or MS? Two major differences I can see right off the bat on mine are that the hair details on the bust and the crown and feathers on the eagle are much more sharply chiseled on my example.

    Thanks.
  • Options
    ZoharZohar Posts: 6,718 ✭✭✭✭✭
    MS64+ PCGS.
    Habsburg Talers

    TalerUniverse.com is a curated numismatic project dedicated to the silver talers, crowns, and medals of the Habsburg Empire and the Holy Roman Empire, spanning the 16th–18th centuries. The collection emphasizes historically significant issues, rare mint varieties, and high-grade NGC/PCGS examples, presented with detailed historical context, scholarly references, and high-resolution photography. TalerUniverse aims to serve both as a private collection showcase and a growing reference resource for collectors, researchers, and students of early-modern European coinage.
  • Options
    coinpicturescoinpictures Posts: 5,345 ✭✭✭
    My copy stand is packed away, but here are some quick and dirty handheld shots to show both the detail and the contrast.

    image

    image

    image

    image

    image



    EDIT: Took a few more...


    image

    image

    image

    image

    image

    image

    image
  • Options
    ZoharZohar Posts: 6,718 ✭✭✭✭✭
    My image is the PCGS's. It is not circulated.
    Habsburg Talers

    TalerUniverse.com is a curated numismatic project dedicated to the silver talers, crowns, and medals of the Habsburg Empire and the Holy Roman Empire, spanning the 16th–18th centuries. The collection emphasizes historically significant issues, rare mint varieties, and high-grade NGC/PCGS examples, presented with detailed historical context, scholarly references, and high-resolution photography. TalerUniverse aims to serve both as a private collection showcase and a growing reference resource for collectors, researchers, and students of early-modern European coinage.
  • Options
    JCMhoustonJCMhouston Posts: 5,306 ✭✭✭
    I think there is still a lot of disagreement on several 19th C. European issues about being proofs or not. And the strike on that one sure fits in the category, very strong coin.
  • Options
    EVillageProwlerEVillageProwler Posts: 5,856 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I think there is still a lot of disagreement on several 19th C. European issues about being proofs or not. And the strike on that one sure fits in the category, very strong coin. >>



    Agreed. It looks like an impaired proof (unsure how it can be 62 of any designation).

    How does one get a hater to stop hating?

    I can be reached at evillageprowler@gmail.com

  • Options
    coinpicturescoinpictures Posts: 5,345 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Agreed. It looks like an impaired proof (unsure how it can be 62 of any designation). >>



    The hits are magnified by the lighting and the resolution; it looks nicer in hand. Also, the designation "impaired proof" is usually reserved for proofs that show signs of wear, i.e., PF55. There are no signs of wear whatsoever. Hits yes, wear no.

    P.S. A lot of what you are seeing in the fields are die polish lines.
  • Options
    ZoharZohar Posts: 6,718 ✭✭✭✭✭
    My newp from today - designated as Proof Cameo.

    Franz Joseph Proof 2 Florins 1870-A PR66 Cameo NGC, KM2232. Vienna, (A), mint. Lightly toned with superb reflectivity. Very rare in Proof quality.

    image
    Habsburg Talers

    TalerUniverse.com is a curated numismatic project dedicated to the silver talers, crowns, and medals of the Habsburg Empire and the Holy Roman Empire, spanning the 16th–18th centuries. The collection emphasizes historically significant issues, rare mint varieties, and high-grade NGC/PCGS examples, presented with detailed historical context, scholarly references, and high-resolution photography. TalerUniverse aims to serve both as a private collection showcase and a growing reference resource for collectors, researchers, and students of early-modern European coinage.
  • Options
    coinpicturescoinpictures Posts: 5,345 ✭✭✭
    Interesting. One they mark a PF and the other PL. Making it up as they go along...
  • Options
    ZoharZohar Posts: 6,718 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Technically PL is Prooflike and PF is Proof. I guess they determined this is a true Proof issue for the type.
    Habsburg Talers

    TalerUniverse.com is a curated numismatic project dedicated to the silver talers, crowns, and medals of the Habsburg Empire and the Holy Roman Empire, spanning the 16th–18th centuries. The collection emphasizes historically significant issues, rare mint varieties, and high-grade NGC/PCGS examples, presented with detailed historical context, scholarly references, and high-resolution photography. TalerUniverse aims to serve both as a private collection showcase and a growing reference resource for collectors, researchers, and students of early-modern European coinage.
  • Options
    coinpicturescoinpictures Posts: 5,345 ✭✭✭
    Right. The PL designation is reserved for business strikes. Also as a general rule, a PL (and even DMPL) will tend not to have the same degree of mirroring or cameo contrast as on a true proof, as the planchet was not deliberately polished prior to striking as in the case of a proof.

    Whereas PL is a descriptor of quality or characteristics that comes after a numeric MS grade, PF is a prefix and is designator of striking mechanics or process.
Sign In or Register to comment.