that is the diffused light "lampshade" effect popularized by MadMarty a number of years ago. it is very deceptive when coupled with juiced white balance but you would need to be severely "juiced" to be fooled by it.
<< <i>but you would need to be severely "juiced" to be fooled by it. >>
or as bush put it... "There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again."
everything in life is but merely on loan to us by our appreciation....lose your appreciation and see
All the seller's images are juiced to the max. Being that I could not really tell what the coins look like based on the images, I would consider all of them sight unseen and pay prices that are in line with that.
<< <i>that is the diffused light "lampshade" effect popularized by MadMarty a number of years ago. it is very deceptive when coupled with juiced white balance but you would need to be severely "juiced" to be fooled by it. >>
Oh Keets!!! At least I'm not forgotten!! The "Lampshade" came from the "white salad bowl" even a "photo tent". All it does is keeps the direct light from the coin. Now juicing it afterwards... ick!!
It is not exactly cheating, I prefer to consider it creative problem solving!!!
<< <i>that is the diffused light "lampshade" effect popularized by MadMarty a number of years ago. it is very deceptive when coupled with juiced white balance but you would need to be severely "juiced" to be fooled by it. >>
Oh Keets!!! At least I'm not forgotten!! The "Lampshade" came from the "white salad bowl" even a "photo tent". All it does is keeps the direct light from the coin. Now juicing it afterwards... ick!! >>
MADMARTY...WHOA N YAYY
did the chicken put you up to replying?
everything in life is but merely on loan to us by our appreciation....lose your appreciation and see
The photo quality of the coin which is the subject of this thread notwithstanding, otherwise common date Morgans in common grades can go for surprising premiums if they have really strong contrast and eye appeal, even if only one sided. I am a fan of such coins and have paid what others would probably call silly prices for these killer cameo coins when available.
That 1880-S I pictured above in both NGC 66* and the Capital holder is one of the heaviest cameoed and deepest mirrored obverses I've ever seen on a business strike Morgan outside of numerous common date CC dollars.
Comments
looks like a frosty morgan there though
hopefully no one takes offense as i'm just being candid about it
<< <i>but you would need to be severely "juiced" to be fooled by it. >>
or as bush put it...
"There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again."
<< <i>I suppose this opinion isn't popular here.. But I love that coin! >>
As do I, but more in the $250 range.
<< <i>Appears to be a scan and Morgans are tough to image well in the white NGC holder. >>
No idea what that coin would look like in hand but doubt t looks like that.
I have never had a problem imaging a morgan in a white NGC holder.
<< <i>
<< <i>Appears to be a scan and Morgans are tough to image well in the white NGC holder. >>
No idea what that coin would look like in hand but doubt t looks like that.
I have never had a problem imaging a morgan in a white NGC holder. >>
Perhaps not with a camera but it is tricky with a scanner. PCGS slabs work much better, in my experience anyway.
I can tell that that is a premium coin, but in the $250 range not for five or 6 hundred bucks.
“In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson
My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!
very poor either intentionally or not
peacockcoins
<< <i>Isn't that Rick Tamaska? I thought he was always well known and respected for his expertise and excellence in all things numismatics. >>
Why he sure is!
<< <i>i'm not a fan of that image or technique used
looks like a frosty morgan there though
hopefully no one takes offense as i'm just being candid about it >>
Agreed. Something is VERY suspicious about that image.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
<< <i>that is the diffused light "lampshade" effect popularized by MadMarty a number of years ago. it is very deceptive when coupled with juiced white balance but you would need to be severely "juiced" to be fooled by it. >>
Oh Keets!!! At least I'm not forgotten!! The "Lampshade" came from the "white salad bowl" even a "photo tent". All it does is keeps the direct light from the coin. Now juicing it afterwards... ick!!
<< <i>
<< <i>that is the diffused light "lampshade" effect popularized by MadMarty a number of years ago. it is very deceptive when coupled with juiced white balance but you would need to be severely "juiced" to be fooled by it. >>
Oh Keets!!! At least I'm not forgotten!! The "Lampshade" came from the "white salad bowl" even a "photo tent". All it does is keeps the direct light from the coin. Now juicing it afterwards... ick!! >>
MADMARTY...WHOA N YAYY
did the chicken put you up to replying?
That 1880-S I pictured above in both NGC 66* and the Capital holder is one of the heaviest cameoed and deepest mirrored obverses I've ever seen on a business strike Morgan outside of numerous common date CC dollars.