China eliminates weight and fineness markings from gold Pandas
CaptHenway
Posts: 32,150 ✭✭✭✭✭
Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
0
Comments
Wouldn't touch these with a 10 foot chopstick.
<< <i>Wouldn't touch these with a 10 foot chopstick. >>
Now that's funny.
I suspect BABA to being being flooded with Brand New Freshly Minted "authentic" Gold Pandas now.
Too many positive BST transactions with too many members to list.
BTW, the plans for grams/KG instead of Troy ounce and not being indicated on the coin were announced back in June.
<< <i>So now what ??? >>
Buy something else.
<< <i> Buy something else. >>
+1.
I would never buy an unmarked piece even if it was slabbed by a major company. If a bullion piece doesn't say "hi I'm gold" on it anywhere it just doesn't appeal to me, gold-wise. Might as well just get a gold plated silver Panda and save the money.
Note: Even jewelry is marked for its finess to facilitate valuation by weight.
Besides, I have what I want from that series and the risk is no longer worth the view.
<< <i>What's the difference between these coins and the pre-33, pesos, marengos or all the other old "bullion" coins everyone buys despite the fact they don't have fineness, content and metal information on them? >>
The difference is the pre-33, pesos, etc. were issued as circulating coinage at the time with the stated value matching the worth then. The Pandas, while they may have a value on them, it is nowhere near the value of the coin and is intended as a bullion piece. Similar to the 5oz silver bullion US National park coins marked at 25 cents face value, never intended to circulate. Being a bullion piece it should have the fineness and weight on the coin as all other bullion pieces do.
These will be unpopular.
<< <i>Being a bullion piece it should have the fineness and weight on the coin as all other bullion pieces do. >>
Agreed.
<< <i>These will be unpopular. >>
At first, yes. But if/when they return to marking the fineness/weight on them, these could become somewhat popular as a one year type coin.
<< <i>Time for American Chop Marks Assay it yourselves. >>
I like that!
Or, we could test them and stick green or gold beans directly on the coins!
Knowledge is the enemy of fear
<< <i>The difference is the pre-33, pesos, etc. were issued as circulating coinage at the time with the stated value matching the worth then. The Pandas, while they may have a value on them, it is nowhere near the value of the coin and is intended as a bullion piece. Similar to the 5oz silver bullion US National park coins marked at 25 cents face value, never intended to circulate. Being a bullion piece it should have the fineness and weight on the coin as all other bullion pieces do.
>>
This says it all..... without the proper information, I would not acquire the object. Cheers, RickO
In God We Trust.... all others pay in Gold and Silver!
This Panda announcement may reduce "orders" and you know what that does to things….
For a modern bullion coin, it's an absolute must.
Amat Colligendo Focum
Top 10 • FOR SALE
GrandAm
I'm usually very careful checking but just trusted the dealer and "bought this year's Panda" never really looking at it. Noticed the lack of marking mentioned on a thread at another bullion board.
do it for you before you purchase or give a return so you can do the testing.
bob
<< <i>I can't believe that I responded to this post, yet in Jan. or Feb. bought a 1oz silver Panda for my partial set from a respected local B&M. Wasn't paying any attention to the fact that there was no weight or purity marking on it. If I was awake that day I would have passed. I'm done with the Panda series. This can only hurt their popularity.
I'm usually very careful checking but just trusted the dealer and "bought this year's Panda" never really looking at it. Noticed the lack of marking mentioned on a thread at another bullion board. >>
IIRC, this should be a step toward switching to metric system and start minting coins in grams.
I read where they are going to distribute them in China through banks now and not just certain outlets, making them widely available which should greatly increase demand in China. That may push the price of the back dates up significantly with the limited amount minted and the sheer number of people in China. I'm not going to bet on it, but have a nice enough supply of back dates to come out nicely if it works out that way.
<< <i>... in Jan. or Feb. bought a 1oz silver Panda for my partial set from a respected local B&M. Wasn't paying any attention to the fact that there was no weight or purity marking on it... >>
Would be interesting to see what reaction you would receive were you to try to sell it. (To someone else, not back to the same B&M.)