Knowing that pics can be deceptive for things like this, even when not done deceptively on purpose, I would lean towards NT. I don't see anything AT like, and the breaks in toning are more like what I would expect from some NT with similar to "milkspot toning" (like on SAEs). Haven't seen that on AT really.
Now, that all said, I have no idea about the grade so not sure if SEGS gave it a higher grade than it deserves due to the toning...and to bump the price...or what, but for the toning, I lean NT.
A lot of 'crackle toning' (with the golds/greens) on early commemorative got through with SEGS years ago. They were considered AT at the time as few, if any crossed.
I would pass on that one. I don't care for the holes in the toning which says to me there is something artificial about it.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
Although the Connecticut commemorative is one of my favorite designs in all of numismatics, I've never owned an example. However, I always stop to admire examples when I come across them. With that in mind, not once have I ever seen one with this much toning. The vast majority of the examples I've seen were bright white with the remainder only slightly toned. But I'll admit I see no problem with the colors and believe the toning to be NT.
<< <i>Although the Connecticut commemorative is one of my favorite designs in all of numismatics, I've never owned an example. However, I always stop to admire examples when I come across them. With that in mind, not once have I ever seen one with this much toning. The vast majority of the examples I've seen were bright white with the remainder only slightly toned. But I'll admit I see no problem with the colors and believe the toning to be NT. >>
I have seen a couple of toned Connecticut half dollars that were toned from the holder (a plush case) in which a some or few of them were sold back in the day. It was not overly dark, and it is even. It did not have "blank spots" like this piece.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
A lot of Connecticuts have this mottled toning with silver patches. The last one I owned was an old fatty NGC 66 with similar patchiness. That coin also had Christmas colors of red and emerald green. It traded for 2X MS66 money. That same mottled toning with silver or gray patches is seen quite often on choice/gem original 19th century silver type coins.
No doubt NT, I've seen many Mercs like this and other coins as well. The blotchy non-toned areas were in contact with something the coin was in, so they didn't tone, that's why there are blotchy areas on both sides. Cool coin, I know exactly the look as I've owned some coins that apparently where in the same "whatever" yours grew up in
Thank you all for the comments. I know PCGS doesn't cross SEGS holders but if I tell them to remove it from the holder first will they grade it? I like the coin it is nicer in hand than the photos show but they are pretty close.
Kosher -Crack it out and send it in. You've no use for the SEGS holder. It offers no value to you. However, they are tougher to crack open than any other.
PCGS only cracks coins out when they've already been approved for crossover.
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." - Geo. Orwell
I have seen this look on coins that are thickly NT and given an acetone bath and handled poorly. The acetone will not remove NT but in many cases will soften it if left tool long in the soak and it gets sticky. I like this coin, nice pick up.
Comments
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
I don't see anything AT like, and the breaks in toning are more like what I would expect from some NT with similar to "milkspot toning" (like on SAEs). Haven't seen that on AT really.
Now, that all said, I have no idea about the grade so not sure if SEGS gave it a higher grade than it deserves due to the toning...and to bump the price...or what, but for the toning, I lean NT.
I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment
Edit for spelling:
Hoard the keys.
Commems and Early Type
They were considered AT at the time as few, if any crossed.
peacockcoins
<< <i>Although the Connecticut commemorative is one of my favorite designs in all of numismatics, I've never owned an example. However, I always stop to admire examples when I come across them. With that in mind, not once have I ever seen one with this much toning. The vast majority of the examples I've seen were bright white with the remainder only slightly toned. But I'll admit I see no problem with the colors and believe the toning to be NT. >>
I have seen a couple of toned Connecticut half dollars that were toned from the holder (a plush case) in which a some or few of them were sold back in the day. It was not overly dark, and it is even. It did not have "blank spots" like this piece.
Both sides are so uniform with those "spaces"
Something not right
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
<< <i>NT and I actually like it. >>
A lot of Connecticuts have this mottled toning with silver patches. The last one I owned was an old fatty NGC 66 with similar patchiness. That coin also had Christmas colors of red and emerald green. It traded for 2X MS66 money. That same mottled toning with silver or gray patches is seen quite often on choice/gem original 19th century silver type coins.
I'll bet it looks nicer than these images. Natural toning.
We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
PCGS does cross SEGS holders. It's up to you how much pain you are willing to take by choosing "cross at any grade".
I had an MS65 DMPL cross at MS64 DMPL once.
PCGS only cracks coins out when they've already been approved for crossover.