I wonder if the Chinese made this thing. Since we didn't have the equipment to give them for making concave - convex coins when we give them press to use back in the day, perhaps this is their contribution to the crooked cause.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
<< <i>• Coin is novelty for souvenir/collection purposes only. >>
>>
Then it should have word "COPY" marked on it.
I hesitate to bring it up, but issue should be addressed. Since the real thing (a flat baseball commemorative coin) was never minted, then perhaps the "automobile mint" could make these things legally.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
<< <i>• Coin is novelty for souvenir/collection purposes only. >>
>>
Then it should have word "COPY" marked on it.
I hesitate to bring it up, but issue should be addressed. Since the real thing (a flat baseball commemorative coin) was never minted, then perhaps the "automobile mint" could make these things legally. >>
No, as it is an obvious attempt to deceive as it still says US, Dollar, etc. bob
Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
<< <i>• Coin is novelty for souvenir/collection purposes only. >>
>>
Then it should have word "COPY" marked on it.
I hesitate to bring it up, but issue should be addressed. Since the real thing (a flat baseball commemorative coin) was never minted, then perhaps the "automobile mint" could make these things legally. >>
No, as it is an obvious attempt to deceive as it still says US, Dollar, etc. bob >>
Don't the 1975 quarter and the 1964-D Peace Dollar that were made by the "automobile mint" say "United States of America" and either "Quarter Dollar" or "One Dollar" on them? I know that both of these items were struck over U.S. mint coins which is the excuse that makes them "legal," but what is to stop the Chinese from doing the same thing?
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
<< <i>• Coin is novelty for souvenir/collection purposes only. >>
>>
Then it should have word "COPY" marked on it.
I hesitate to bring it up, but issue should be addressed. Since the real thing (a flat baseball commemorative coin) was never minted, then perhaps the "automobile mint" could make these things legally. >>
No, as it is an obvious attempt to deceive as it still says US, Dollar, etc. bob >>
Don't the 1975 quarter and the 1964-D Peace Dollar that were made by the "automobile mint" say "United States of America" and either "Quarter Dollar" or "One Dollar" on them? I know that both of these items were struck over U.S. mint coins which is the excuse that makes them "legal," but what is to stop the Chinese from doing the same thing? >>
im not sure if thats required since both were really never minted where the h.o.f. coin was. im not looking for an argument im just saying.
Comments
quite accurate, Bill.
bob
<< <i>• Coin is novelty for souvenir/collection purposes only. >>
<< <i>Under Item Specifics, it states..........
<< <i>• Coin is novelty for souvenir/collection purposes only. >>
>>
Then it should have word "COPY" marked on it.
I hesitate to bring it up, but issue should be addressed. Since the real thing (a flat baseball commemorative coin) was never minted, then perhaps the "automobile mint" could make these things legally.
<< <i>
<< <i>Under Item Specifics, it states..........
<< <i>• Coin is novelty for souvenir/collection purposes only. >>
>>
Then it should have word "COPY" marked on it.
I hesitate to bring it up, but issue should be addressed. Since the real thing (a flat baseball commemorative coin) was never minted, then perhaps the "automobile mint" could make these things legally.
No, as it is an obvious attempt to deceive as it still says US, Dollar, etc.
bob
seven minutes apart. i would have posted here if i wasn't fooling with that ss america inventory sheet which had all my focus.
.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Under Item Specifics, it states..........
<< <i>• Coin is novelty for souvenir/collection purposes only. >>
>>
Then it should have word "COPY" marked on it.
I hesitate to bring it up, but issue should be addressed. Since the real thing (a flat baseball commemorative coin) was never minted, then perhaps the "automobile mint" could make these things legally.
No, as it is an obvious attempt to deceive as it still says US, Dollar, etc.
bob
Don't the 1975 quarter and the 1964-D Peace Dollar that were made by the "automobile mint" say "United States of America" and either "Quarter Dollar" or "One Dollar" on them? I know that both of these items were struck over U.S. mint coins which is the excuse that makes them "legal," but what is to stop the Chinese from doing the same thing?
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Under Item Specifics, it states..........
<< <i>• Coin is novelty for souvenir/collection purposes only. >>
>>
Then it should have word "COPY" marked on it.
I hesitate to bring it up, but issue should be addressed. Since the real thing (a flat baseball commemorative coin) was never minted, then perhaps the "automobile mint" could make these things legally.
No, as it is an obvious attempt to deceive as it still says US, Dollar, etc.
bob
Don't the 1975 quarter and the 1964-D Peace Dollar that were made by the "automobile mint" say "United States of America" and either "Quarter Dollar" or "One Dollar" on them? I know that both of these items were struck over U.S. mint coins which is the excuse that makes them "legal," but what is to stop the Chinese from doing the same thing? >>
im not sure if thats required since both were really never minted where the h.o.f. coin was. im not looking for an argument im just saying.
<< <i>Under Item Specifics, it states..........
<< <i>• Coin is novelty for souvenir/collection purposes only. >>
>>
The REAL HOFs are a novelty for souvenir/collection purposes only.
<< <i>San Antonio Clothing Company >>