Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

So I was doing some coin doctoring today....

Used some MS70 on a gold coin that had some haze on it. the lighting techniques are different but you can see the difference.

I hope I didn't offend anyone by doctoring some bullion. I like it better.

image

Comments

  • Options
    pruebaspruebas Posts: 5,247 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Removing haze on a proof coin is a good thing. I use Coinsolv for this, and it works great.

    Beautiful coin!
  • Options
    braddickbraddick Posts: 25,147 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I don't know how many would confess removing haze from a proof coin is considered Coin Doctoring. I suppose a few- but I'd think mostly not.
  • Options
    I think it looks much better. Anyone who considers what you did coin doctoring needs to have their head examined.
    Veni, Vidi, Vici
  • Options
    crazyhounddogcrazyhounddog Posts: 14,230 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I had a feeling about you, Doctor!!image
    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
  • Options
    MGLICKERMGLICKER Posts: 7,995 ✭✭✭
    More like nursing it, I suppose.
  • Options
    lcoopielcoopie Posts: 8,875 ✭✭✭✭✭
    nice work
    LCoopie = Les
  • Options
    Wabbit2313Wabbit2313 Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It looks nice!
  • Options
    LindeDadLindeDad Posts: 18,766 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Growing up through the years in the hobby have usually heard this referred to more often than not as conservation.
    And normally actable on proof coins. image
  • Options
    coindudeonebaycoindudeonebay Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I had a feeling about you, Doctor!!image >>

    Curses to all of you for not putting the phd at the end of my name! lol
  • Options
    TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 45,090 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That's not a doctor. That's an "In Turn"
  • Options
    ColonelJessupColonelJessup Posts: 6,442 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm a strong supporter of mindful conservation. In this instance, not being clear about the purity or possible alloy, all I can say is it worked, and it looks fine for what it is

    I think Coinsolv would be a better first step as it is essentially inert. And more effective than acetone in many instances.

    Not only do they all have their uses, there's a hierarchy of non-invasiveness of solvents relating to deposits and the way they cling to surfaces. I've got to get me some Xylene and play, and I'll miss tri-chloro-tri-fluoro-ethane (Dissolve) to the end of my days.

    I only work on pre-1933 gold, and have conserved millions of bucks of it over the years. Use of MS70 on proof coins of that era usually ruins them as far as many traditionalists would be concerned. Ask RYK for a definition of "crusty". True for any US Gold 1933-earlier.

    Pruebas et al. "Removing haze on a gold coin is a good thing" ?????

    Try "Some gold coins with haze look better when it's removed, and this sure was one of them !"

    Different conservation "rules" for different years and dates and types and metals. Solvents, emulsifiers, acids, bases, dilution, duration, vibration.... Damn!

    edited to add: But for a lot of coins they're fairly simple, and the techniques/processes/chemicals are transferable from one sort of coin to another, even across metals.

    "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." - Geo. Orwell
  • Options
    SoCalBigMarkSoCalBigMark Posts: 2,848 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • Options
    FullStrikeFullStrike Posts: 4,353 ✭✭✭
    Alright !

    Now just get some accounts. Hang out a shingle.

    Next week start looking at BMW's.

    image
  • Options
    coindudeonebaycoindudeonebay Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭
    I've never used Koinsolv before, can anyone give some information on how it works? I would prefer not to use acetone due to the fumes. How is this on fumes?
  • Options
    ms70ms70 Posts: 13,958 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Well done doctor!

    image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file