Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Which set would you rather have?

Just a question for the board members here. I am currently working on two vintage set a 1953 topps in Psa 6+ and a 1956 in Psa 7+ shape. I'm going to need to throttle back on my spending for awhile ( tend to get out of hand ) but want to finish one of these up first. I am halfway finished with the 56 set but have all the HOF's and every minor star just need team cards and commons. The 53 is the same way but I only need 42 cards ( 28 high numbers and the mays). If you had to pick one to finish before you cut back spending for awhile which would you choose and why?

Comments

  • cwazzycwazzy Posts: 3,257
    For me it would be the '53 set. My favorite set of the decade. The '56 set is good but I LOVE the artwork in the '53 Topps set (excluding Whitey Ford who looks like he's got the worst case of constipation in history).
    Chris
    My small collection
    Want List:
    '61 Topps Roy Campanella in PSA 5-7
    Cardinal T206 cards
    Adam Wainwright GU Jersey
  • TabeTabe Posts: 6,236 ✭✭✭✭✭
    No-brainer for me - the 1953 all the way. That's a beautiful, iconic set. 1956 is great with the dual imagery on front but... it ain't 1953.
  • BaltimoreYankeeBaltimoreYankee Posts: 3,110 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Another vote for 1953 here. The color borders make it tough. The '56 is a little too similar to '55.
    Daniel
  • spazzyspazzy Posts: 592 ✭✭
    1953 all the way!
  • ThoseBackPagesThoseBackPages Posts: 4,871 ✭✭
    1953
    Big Fan of: HOF Post War RC, Graded RCs
    WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
  • esquiresportsesquiresports Posts: 1,360 ✭✭✭
    I like the look of the 1956s more and would go with that set first.
    Always buying 1971 OPC Baseball packs.
  • vettfanaticvettfanatic Posts: 643 ✭✭✭
    definitely 1953
  • miwlvrnmiwlvrn Posts: 4,273 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Both sets are nice, but I'm a bit more partial to the 1954's.
  • cwazzycwazzy Posts: 3,257
    I must say that I'm rather surprised with the results so far. I figured the '56 set would get a lot more love than it has.
    Chris
    My small collection
    Want List:
    '61 Topps Roy Campanella in PSA 5-7
    Cardinal T206 cards
    Adam Wainwright GU Jersey
  • lbcoach20lbcoach20 Posts: 883 ✭✭✭
    1953 for me.
  • vintagefunvintagefun Posts: 1,974 ✭✭✭
    Both great sets. I prefer the 56, but would complete the 53 based on where you're at.

    Good luck whichever you decide.

    Jim
    52-90 All Sports, Mostly Topps, Mostly HOF, and some assorted wax.
  • Love hearing other collectors point of view. 1956's where my childhood favorite the 53 set always seemed out of reach but I got older and it became possible. I'm probably gonna finish up the 53 set it feels so close and that would no doubt be the centerpiece of my collection. I saw the 54 set mentioned. That's a beautiful set also I actually have the big 3 in that year in SGC 84. If I ever lean into that year I'd probably collect it in SGC. The drawback there is finding commons already graded.
  • mattinglymint23mattinglymint23 Posts: 1,261 ✭✭
    I'm building a 56 set slowly with the 53 next on list. I can't say I one more than other but if you look to move 56s let me know.


  • << <i>I'm building a 56 set slowly with the 53 next on list. I can't say I one more than other but if you look to move 56s let me know. >>



    I had a 56 raw set that was ex/ex+ with a good bit of ex/exmt thrown in. I'm not sure what your looking for as far as 56's go. I still have 2/3 of the set raw minus the stars.
  • 72skywalker72skywalker Posts: 1,554 ✭✭✭
    I say 1953
    Collecting Yankees and vintage Star Wars
  • bbcemporiumbbcemporium Posts: 684 ✭✭✭
    1953 Topps hands down
    Registry Sets

    "Common sense is the best distributed commodity in the world, for every man is convinced that he is well supplied with it"
  • heritageheritage Posts: 2,662 ✭✭✭
    Each set has there strong points and I would love to own either but If I could only have one in hand i would pick the 53 set ! The art work is amazing on them. Good luck with your choice.
  • 60sfan60sfan Posts: 311 ✭✭✭


    << <i>The '56 is a little too similar to '55. >>



    +1
  • RonBurgundyRonBurgundy Posts: 5,491 ✭✭✭
    53........& then slowly upgrade it to 7's
    Ron Burgundy

    Buying Vintage, all sports.
    Buying Woody Hayes, Les Horvath, Vic Janowicz, and Jesse Owens autographed items
  • BLUEJAYWAYBLUEJAYWAY Posts: 10,140 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1953. Always partial to the artwork/colors. For me the 53 Mantle was a stunner. More appealing, to me, than the 52.
    Successful transactions:Tookybandit. "Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others".
  • ChiefsFan1stChiefsFan1st Posts: 845 ✭✭✭
    Im not familiar with either set but what I would consider would be price/ease to complete. Since
    you like both sets, pick the 1 that should be easiest and cheapest to complete. That way, you have
    1 knocked out. Then later when the funds catch back up to you, you can complete the other. Of
    course, im a tightazz at heart, so take this advice with a grain of saltimage
    I dont wanna grow up, Im a Toys-R-Us kid!
Sign In or Register to comment.