Bit Harsh?

Boopotts · May 9, 2014 1:48AM

Looks like we're really starting to buckle down on centering:

Text

LarkinCollector · May 9, 2014 1:55AM

That one's definitely worth a review or resub, centering looks fine for a 7.

itzagoner · May 9, 2014 2:11AM

could be a misteak.

LarkinCollector · May 9, 2014 2:13AM

<< could be a misteak. >>

That sounds delicious

markj111 · May 9, 2014 2:16AM

I have a 1964 PSA 8o/c John Blanchard. The card is dead centered front and back. It was cheaper to buy a replacement than to pay for shipping and regrading to have it reviewed.

swartz1 · May 9, 2014 2:22AM

wont get 7 o/c money, that is for sure...

fiveniner · May 9, 2014 4:05AM

That is outrages.

hammered · May 9, 2014 4:31AM

Wonder if it has PD or ST and the grader applied the wrong qualifier

mtcards · May 9, 2014 6:33AM

My spellcheck is overheating on this thread

RyanAdmirer · May 9, 2014 9:26AM

<< 

<< could be a misteak. >>

That sounds delicious

>>

That was awesome! I'll probably have that going through my head a time or two this weekend and still get a chuckle.

mlbfan2 · May 9, 2014 9:31AM

<< 

<< 

<< could be a misteak. >>

That sounds delicious

>>

That was awesome! >>

It would have been funny if you has said "That was well done."

Bit Harsh?

Comments