Home U.S. Coin Forum

Major error eye candy #13: John Wilkes Booth, that's who

jonathanbjonathanb Posts: 3,658 ✭✭✭✭✭
Sometimes a bit of slag will be rolled into the coinage strip. If that slag later breaks apart and falls out, the results can be dramatic. A 'blowhole' error forms when a bit of slag falls out of the middle of a planchet, leaving an intact rim with a hole in the middle. This example has an incomplete rim, so it isn't quite a blowhole. Call it a defective planchet, or a very very very ragged clip. Whatever the case, it'd be hard to top the positioning of the hole!

imageimage

Earlier:
Major error eye candy #1: Edge strike, double struck
Major error eye candy #2: 125% struck through cloth
Major error eye candy #3: Struck through feeder finger
Major error eye candy #4: 1955 Double Date Lincoln Cent
Major error eye candy #5: Nonface strikes
Major error eye candy #6: Reeding struck through coin
Major error eye candy #7: Broadstrike with partial counterbrockage
Major error eye candy #8: Incomplete clip mystery dime?
Major error eye candy #9: Clad layer split before strike
Major error eye candy #11: Lincoln 1c indent by 10c
Major error eye candy #12: Struck on scrap with odd edge marks

Comments

  • ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That's a nice one, quite large.

    It would have been cooler if it was a blowhole.
  • goodmoney4badmoneygoodmoney4badmoney Posts: 1,263 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It's close enough to a blowhole. Semantics...
    also, it's a nice coin!
  • astroratastrorat Posts: 9,221 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Here's one ...

    imageimage
    Numismatist Ordinaire
    See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
  • errormavenerrormaven Posts: 1,168 ✭✭✭
    Neither of the "blowholes" featured in this thread are the result of slag falling out of the planchet/coin. The beveled edges of the holes indicate that these gaps opened up in the coin metal strip during rolling as the result of tensile stresses.
    Mike Diamond is an error coin writer and researcher. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those held by any organization I am a member of.
  • BaleyBaley Posts: 22,663 ✭✭✭✭✭
    wow, and on the first year of the Kennedy half, too.

    An awesome companion piece would be a similar half dollar (2009 would be ideal!)

    neat neat coin, very curious at the approximate value of this kind of error.

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Interesting.... have not encountered a coin with that anomaly as yet.... Cheers, RickO
  • SaorAlbaSaorAlba Posts: 7,574 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That has cool factor all over it.
    Tir nam beann, nan gleann, s'nan gaisgeach ~ Saorstat Albanaich a nis!
  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 28,596 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>That has cool factor all over it. >>

    no kidding. thats awesome.
  • stevebensteveben Posts: 4,620 ✭✭✭✭✭
    cool coin!
  • jonathanbjonathanb Posts: 3,658 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Neither of the "blowholes" featured in this thread are the result of slag falling out of the planchet/coin. The beveled edges of the holes indicate that these gaps opened up in the coin metal strip during rolling as the result of tensile stresses. >>

    FWIW, I disagree with that in respect to mine. The hole over Lincoln's head is fairly round, and the interior edges are jagged. The jaggedness also is present above and to the left of IN GOD. The only beveling I see is on the "tongue" of medal where WE would have been, which is much thinner than the rest of the coin and received a very weak impression as a result.
  • errormavenerrormaven Posts: 1,168 ✭✭✭
    Your photos show beveling around most of the internal margin of the deficit. This is typical of "blowholes" produced by tensile forces. You see similar beveling in the facing edges of many "jagged fissures" that extend into the interior the coin from the edge. In these errors, there is no place for slag to have resided.

    Holes due to missing slag do occur, but they are very rare, and the internal margin shows no beveling. Instead they show a sharp, "flinty", irregular topography.
    Mike Diamond is an error coin writer and researcher. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those held by any organization I am a member of.
  • astroratastrorat Posts: 9,221 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Your photos show beveling around most of the internal margin of the deficit. This is typical of "blowholes" produced by tensile forces. You see similar beveling in the facing edges of many "jagged fissures" that extend into the interior the coin from the edge. In these errors, there is no place for slag to have resided.

    Holes due to missing slag do occur, but they are very rare, and the internal margin shows no beveling. Instead they show a sharp, "flinty", irregular topography. >>

    image

    Call mine whatever you like ... I just like it. image

    Mine was purchased as a "blow hole" error and I am sure the name was just a reference to the "hole" being internal and not openly connected to the edge (which I generally see referred to as a defective planchet?. One explanation I had heard was as the coin was struck there was an internal "bubble" that burst.

    Mike ... what do you think occurs to cause these types of defects?

    Edited for grammar ...
    Numismatist Ordinaire
    See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
  • errormavenerrormaven Posts: 1,168 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Your photos show beveling around most of the internal margin of the deficit. This is typical of "blowholes" produced by tensile forces. You see similar beveling in the facing edges of many "jagged fissures" that extend into the interior the coin from the edge. In these errors, there is no place for slag to have resided.

    Holes due to missing slag do occur, but they are very rare, and the internal margin shows no beveling. Instead they show a sharp, "flinty", irregular topography. >>

    image

    Call mine whatever you like ... I just like it. image

    Mine was purchased as a "blow hole" error and I am sure the name was just a reference to the "hole" being internal and not openly connected to the edge (which I generally see referred to as a defective planchet?. One explanation I had heard was as the coin was struck there was an internal "bubble" that burst.

    Mike ... what do you think occurs to cause these types of defects?

    Edited for grammar ... >>



    Yours is a typical example. The beveled edges are consistent with tensile forces tearing open a hole in the coin metal strip during rolling.
    Mike Diamond is an error coin writer and researcher. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those held by any organization I am a member of.
  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 33,581 ✭✭✭✭✭
    bevels are shear

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • errormavenerrormaven Posts: 1,168 ✭✭✭
    Not in this case.
    Mike Diamond is an error coin writer and researcher. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those held by any organization I am a member of.
  • BLUEJAYWAYBLUEJAYWAY Posts: 9,582 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The 64 looks like a "bullet" hole. Appropo considering how our President was assasinated.image
    Successful transactions:Tookybandit. "Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others".

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file