Major error eye candy #13: John Wilkes Booth, that's who
![jonathanb](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/authoricons/hk1004.jpg)
Sometimes a bit of slag will be rolled into the coinage strip. If that slag later breaks apart and falls out, the results can be dramatic. A 'blowhole' error forms when a bit of slag falls out of the middle of a planchet, leaving an intact rim with a hole in the middle. This example has an incomplete rim, so it isn't quite a blowhole. Call it a defective planchet, or a very very very ragged clip. Whatever the case, it'd be hard to top the positioning of the hole!
![image](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/oldattachments/1964-1c-near-blowhole-obv.jpg)
![image](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/oldattachments/1964-1c-near-blowhole-rev.jpg)
Earlier:
Major error eye candy #1: Edge strike, double struck
Major error eye candy #2: 125% struck through cloth
Major error eye candy #3: Struck through feeder finger
Major error eye candy #4: 1955 Double Date Lincoln Cent
Major error eye candy #5: Nonface strikes
Major error eye candy #6: Reeding struck through coin
Major error eye candy #7: Broadstrike with partial counterbrockage
Major error eye candy #8: Incomplete clip mystery dime?
Major error eye candy #9: Clad layer split before strike
Major error eye candy #11: Lincoln 1c indent by 10c
Major error eye candy #12: Struck on scrap with odd edge marks
![image](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/oldattachments/1964-1c-near-blowhole-obv.jpg)
![image](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/oldattachments/1964-1c-near-blowhole-rev.jpg)
Earlier:
Major error eye candy #1: Edge strike, double struck
Major error eye candy #2: 125% struck through cloth
Major error eye candy #3: Struck through feeder finger
Major error eye candy #4: 1955 Double Date Lincoln Cent
Major error eye candy #5: Nonface strikes
Major error eye candy #6: Reeding struck through coin
Major error eye candy #7: Broadstrike with partial counterbrockage
Major error eye candy #8: Incomplete clip mystery dime?
Major error eye candy #9: Clad layer split before strike
Major error eye candy #11: Lincoln 1c indent by 10c
Major error eye candy #12: Struck on scrap with odd edge marks
0
Comments
It would have been cooler if it was a blowhole.
also, it's a nice coin!
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
An awesome companion piece would be a similar half dollar (2009 would be ideal!)
neat neat coin, very curious at the approximate value of this kind of error.
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
<< <i>That has cool factor all over it. >>
no kidding. thats awesome.
<< <i>Neither of the "blowholes" featured in this thread are the result of slag falling out of the planchet/coin. The beveled edges of the holes indicate that these gaps opened up in the coin metal strip during rolling as the result of tensile stresses. >>
FWIW, I disagree with that in respect to mine. The hole over Lincoln's head is fairly round, and the interior edges are jagged. The jaggedness also is present above and to the left of IN GOD. The only beveling I see is on the "tongue" of medal where WE would have been, which is much thinner than the rest of the coin and received a very weak impression as a result.
Holes due to missing slag do occur, but they are very rare, and the internal margin shows no beveling. Instead they show a sharp, "flinty", irregular topography.
<< <i>Your photos show beveling around most of the internal margin of the deficit. This is typical of "blowholes" produced by tensile forces. You see similar beveling in the facing edges of many "jagged fissures" that extend into the interior the coin from the edge. In these errors, there is no place for slag to have resided.
Holes due to missing slag do occur, but they are very rare, and the internal margin shows no beveling. Instead they show a sharp, "flinty", irregular topography. >>
Call mine whatever you like ... I just like it.
Mine was purchased as a "blow hole" error and I am sure the name was just a reference to the "hole" being internal and not openly connected to the edge (which I generally see referred to as a defective planchet?. One explanation I had heard was as the coin was struck there was an internal "bubble" that burst.
Mike ... what do you think occurs to cause these types of defects?
Edited for grammar ...
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
<< <i>
<< <i>Your photos show beveling around most of the internal margin of the deficit. This is typical of "blowholes" produced by tensile forces. You see similar beveling in the facing edges of many "jagged fissures" that extend into the interior the coin from the edge. In these errors, there is no place for slag to have resided.
Holes due to missing slag do occur, but they are very rare, and the internal margin shows no beveling. Instead they show a sharp, "flinty", irregular topography. >>
Call mine whatever you like ... I just like it.
Mine was purchased as a "blow hole" error and I am sure the name was just a reference to the "hole" being internal and not openly connected to the edge (which I generally see referred to as a defective planchet?. One explanation I had heard was as the coin was struck there was an internal "bubble" that burst.
Mike ... what do you think occurs to cause these types of defects?
Edited for grammar ... >>
Yours is a typical example. The beveled edges are consistent with tensile forces tearing open a hole in the coin metal strip during rolling.