86 Fleer Basketball Box versus 86 Fleer Jordan PSA 10
Doublestriker
Posts: 547 ✭✭
After reading the latest post about the 86 Fleer Basketball Box it got me thinking. About two years ago I had the opportunity to buy a 86 Fleer Basketball Wax Box for about 12K but did not pull the trigger. At last years National I bought a PSA 10 Jordan Rookie for 9,500.00. After comparing the investment of both I thought the psa 10 was best way to go. I know all you unopened collectors will disagree but let's look at the comparisons. If you by a box the chances of getting a psa 10 Jordan are very very slim. Even if you get several psa 9's in some of the key rookie cards and a few psa 10's you still would not get anywhere near the 12K-14K it will cost you for the box(if you can find one). As much as I love unopened just like a lot of you it just does not make sense from a financial/investment standpoint. Thoughts?
0
Comments
Having said that, this is a win win situation and you picked up the premiere card of the decade and a top card of the hobby. If the values were the same and always would be the same, which would you rather own?
You make a good point about the scarcity of the box but isn't the cards in the box ultimately what gives it value? This is one thing that I have never understood about unopened pricing. Would love to hear opinions from all of the unopened collector's.
<< <i>You make a good point about the scarcity of the box but isn't the cards in the box ultimately what gives it value? This is one thing that I have never understood about unopened pricing. Would love to hear opinions from all of the unopened collector's. >>
Sometimes cards matter and sometimes it's just the scarcity of the unopened product. But in most cases both play a part and I think this is one of those cases.
If a pack is rare enough to the point where the unopened guys want it more than the people ripping, then the cards start to have less and less importance. I think it's clearer in non-sport. I have packs that I'm not sure what the cards look like and don't care to find out. The packs I have from the TV series the untouchables and kung-fu are packs I really like, but I can't imagine the cards would interest me and I don't know what the sets look like. But if people want the cards inside they still need to compete with my bids for the packs that are out there. That changes the value and at some point no one interested in just the cards will even look at the packs.
But I think people have taken this concept a little too far of late. We can look at '73 baseball to see one of many clear cut cases that show when the cards do matter. A 5th series pack is more valuable than the others and it's because of the chance that there is a Schmidt RC in there. In part it becomes more rare because people will just rip it looking for the Schmidt if the price is too low, but it's also fun to know the pack might have the big card. When I look through my packs I consider the key rookies and what might be inside. It's not everything, but it's something.
Back to this box... It's a Jordan RC, of course it matters! But we have a situation where most packs being sold on their own don't have a chance at a Jordan and packs from whole boxes do. Imagine that you have 2 stacks of '86 fleer bk packs to sell and one is in a box marked "Guranteed Unopened pack with no Jordan inside" and the other says "on average, 1 in 11 of these unopened packs will have a Jordan RC". What do you think the difference in price would be? With the box described in the OP, you have 36 packs from the good stack and all these packs from the bad stack are still selling for $300+. So the scarcity of the random packs is major, but the potential for the Jordan is the driving factor.
Edit to add that it would be great to see a scan of this Jordan 10 we are talking about.
You make a lot of good points. I just think unopened has went crazy lately but I guess it has a lot to do with overall scarcity of product.
<< <i>if you are buying a 10, that's the type of example to get. Not a spec of white, and dead nuts centered. Well done. >>
+1
Great card!
Most unopened boxes are worth significantly more than the cards within. Compare 1982-1986 Topps Baseball. The value of a full set, which you wont get is far less (many times so), than the actual value of a box.
Secondly, the number of PSA 10 Jordan's will either stay steady or increase as the years go by. The number of unopened 86-87 Fleer will always continue to decrease (legit ones anyway)
Either, I think will go up in value, however, the packs will be the only one of the two to grow in scarcity. I would be happy to own either
I personally don't collect for investment purposes, and don't think either piece will ever allow one to retire or buy a yacht, but given (A) that there are many more single card collectors than unopened collectors, and (B) the certainty of a PSA 10 versus the two levels of uncertainty of unopened (1: is it really sealed and 2: what lies within), I would go with the PSA 10 all day every day. Easier to find a buyer/appeals to a broader market, and it is a known quantity. The amount of high-profile packs that were later deemed bad would give me pause on any high-end unopened. Whereas in stark contrast, I don't see many fake cards making it into PSA slabs.
Instagram: mattyc_collection
Join the Rookie stars on top PSA registry today:
1980-1989 Cello Packs - Rookies
That said, from an investment/value standpoint I would choose the box every time. It is simply supply and demand. I can find a PSA 10 Jordan rookie on eBay every day of the year, but a legit box comes up for purchase about once every 2-3 years. There are simply not enough boxes to come anywhere close to demand. This is why in the past 3 years the price of the box has doubled to $20,000 while the PSA 10 has remained at $10,000. Everytime a pack is opened, there are more singles and less unopened. The supply of wax will never go up which is why unopened will always be king on high demand packs. Lets face it, aside from 1952 Topps baseball there is not a more in demand pack.
Net, if given $12,000 at the time...I would have bought the box and negotiated a high end 8 to go with it. Then you would have the insanely rare box and a centered copy to stare at. Regardless, you have a perfect Jordan rookie that all will envy!
<< <i>You make a good point about the scarcity of the box but isn't the cards in the box ultimately what gives it value? >>
You are trying to apply common sense to a hobby where some wouldn't spend $0.25 for a 1980's common, but will spend hundreds for a $0.25 1980's low pop common in a PSA 10 slab.
Or taking a Walter Payton autographed item selling at $100, cutting it up, putting it on a card numbered to 100, and it magically becomes a $500 item (even though it looks worse!).
But one needn't look within this hobby to understand how much some collectors value the scarcity of unopened items irregardless of the value contained within. Look at Star Wars figures or vintage toys/games for example.
The value is just as much (and often more) in the nostalgia, novelty, or scarcity than actual contents.
Snorto~
I would go with the unopened box everytime, it's high stakes gambling for many who buy expensive unopened just to wrip them later on.
Successful card BST transactions with cbcnow, brogurt, gstarling, Bravesfan 007, and rajah 424.