Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Cool baseball card ad from 1955. Shows a ton of 1952 Topps.

This is a cool picture of a baseball card ad from 1955. Makes you wish we could go back in time and gobble up all those 1952 topps that are lying on the ground. Sorry if someone has posted this here already. I just thought the pic was a slice of pure Americana.
image

Comments

  • And of course I can't get the picture to show up. I'm posting this on an iPad and have no idea what I'm doing. Lol
  • heritageheritage Posts: 2,662 ✭✭✭
    That's cool..
  • Yeah, it really is an awesome picture.
  • maddux69maddux69 Posts: 2,150 ✭✭✭✭✭
    What an ad! I am sure many can identify quite a few in there, though I see a '54 Ted Williams in the bottom right and a 1952 Look 'N See George Washington in front of his left knee.
  • Ok, who will be the first to find the mantle?
  • That looks like a Ralph Kiner on the bottom left corner of the photo as well.


  • << <i>Ok, who will be the first to find the mantle? >>



    It's probably buried in there somewhere along with a Willie Mays. Lol
  • DboneesqDboneesq Posts: 18,219 ✭✭
    Nice to see that the kid took good care of Matt Batts ... he's in the album ... top left.
    STAY HEALTHY!

    Doug

    Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
  • bobbyw8469bobbyw8469 Posts: 7,139 ✭✭✭


    << <i>What an ad! I am sure many can identify quite a few in there, though I see a '54 Ted Williams in the bottom right and a 1952 Look 'N See George Washington in front of his left knee. >>



    The 1954 Williams is not the real deal. That card doesn't have a top white border.


  • << <i>The 1954 Williams is not the real deal. That card doesn't have a top white border. >>


    That's not a white border on the top of the 1954 Topps #1 Ted Williams card. It is his name in white.

    And yes it is the real deal.

    There's also a 1954 Topps #250 Ted Williams card near the kid's left foot.
  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭


    << <i>The 1954 Williams is not the real deal. That card doesn't have a top white border. >>



    Incorrect.

    image

    edited to add: Ah, I see what Bobby is saying but agree with Maurice. The white on top is Ted's name and you can see slight 'bleeding' of the orange between his first and last name.
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • bobbyw8469bobbyw8469 Posts: 7,139 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Incorrect. >>



    Uhhhh..no offense, but the card you just showed has no top white border.......it has an orange top border, if it shows anything at all.
  • bobbyw8469bobbyw8469 Posts: 7,139 ✭✭✭
    Here you go Stown.

    This is a real Ted Williams card. The 1954 Topps has white borders on the sides and the bottom but nothing at the top.


    image

    Here is a Ted Williams card that is not real. Notice the white borders all around the card.

    image

  • Again, Bobby, there's no top white border on the 1954 #1 Williams card pictured on the cover of the Detroit News magazine.

    It is a low resolution image so it may look like a solid white border on some monitors but it is the white printed name.

    Look carefully. If you think that's a white border on the top then where is the white printed name? Enough said.
  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Here you go Stown. >>



    I'm assuming you missed my edit while searching for those images. Look again, our explanations appear to be the case.
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • StingrayStingray Posts: 8,843 ✭✭✭
    Maybe it is just very OC T/B?? You can see the black lettering for the team name and his position.
  • baseballfanbaseballfan Posts: 5,464 ✭✭✭
    Cool picture I always like to see the old adds with cards of that period in them.

    Fred

    collecting RAW Topps baseball cards 1952 Highs to 1972. looking for collector grade (somewhere between psa 4-7 condition). let me know what you have, I'll take it, I want to finish sets, I must have something you can use for trade.

    looking for Topps 71-72 hi's-62-53-54-55-59, I have these sets started

  • bishopbishop Posts: 2,917 ✭✭✭
    image
    Topps Baseball-1948, 1951 to 2017
    Bowman Baseball -1948-1955
    Fleer Baseball-1923, 1959-2007

    Al
  • mlbfan2mlbfan2 Posts: 3,115 ✭✭✭
    Yep, the white "line" on top is his name. It's clearly more jagged than the bottom border, plus it has a gap.
    image
  • bishopbishop Posts: 2,917 ✭✭✭
    Surely they were not counterfeiting cards in 1955 that you could buy for a nickel image
    Topps Baseball-1948, 1951 to 2017
    Bowman Baseball -1948-1955
    Fleer Baseball-1923, 1959-2007

    Al
  • frankhardyfrankhardy Posts: 8,137 ✭✭✭✭✭
    My first thought was that it was a 1954 Sports Illustrated insert cutout. I have the Cardinals team set and all of those have a top border. Now that I see the blow up, I see the gap in his name.

    Shane

  • mlbfan2mlbfan2 Posts: 3,115 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Folks, the Ted Williams is from the 1954 Sports Illustrated magazine that had the inserts. Those have a top border. I have the Cardinals team set, and just confirmed this. >>



    As Maurice said, if you think that's a white border on the top then where is the white printed name? Plus, how do you explain the gap in the "border"?

  • 19541954 Posts: 2,905 ✭✭✭
    Top five things that pisses me off about this kid.
    5. He has rubber bands on two stacks of cards
    4. He hasa bat next to the cards
    3. He glued the cards in the album
    2. He has his pant legs pulled up to his knees

    and the #1 thing that pisses me off is he is wearing his cleats in the house.
    Looking for high grade rookie cards and unopened boxes/cases
  • frankhardyfrankhardy Posts: 8,137 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Folks, the Ted Williams is from the 1954 Sports Illustrated magazine that had the inserts. Those have a top border. I have the Cardinals team set, and just confirmed this. >>



    As Maurice said, if you think that's a white border on the top then where is the white printed name? Plus, how do you explain the gap in the "border"? >>



    I corrected my post. That was my first thought until I saw the blow up picture.

    Shane

  • bobbyw8469bobbyw8469 Posts: 7,139 ✭✭✭


    << <i>My first thought was that it was a 1954 Sports Illustrated insert cutout. >>



    That was mine as well Frank. Now that I see the enlarged version, I can see that is is not a white border at the top of the card.
  • Carew29Carew29 Posts: 4,025 ✭✭

    even in 1969 at age 8 i had never rubberbanded my cards !! Spoke tires yes..rubberbands no. Kills me seeing that every time!
  • yankeesmanyankeesman Posts: 990 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I believe he "rubber banded" a Preacher Roe in the one stack. Also, identifying from before, I believe he's holding an Art Houtteman.
    Don Mattingly, Yogi Berra, Thurman Munson, Brian McCann and Topps Rookie Cup autograph collector
    www.questfortherookiecup.com
  • CWCW Posts: 1,221 ✭✭✭
    OK, why am I the only one confused here??? Here's Bobby's quote...

    >>>The 1954 Williams is not the real deal. That card doesn't have a top white border.

    I just assumed you were being sarcastic, Bobby, as 54 Topps should not have a top white border.

    But then the thread continues on with everyone assuming Bobby said it DOES have a top white border?

    I don't know why but the confusion from this thread is really annoying! imageimage I need a break!



  • CWCW Posts: 1,221 ✭✭✭
    bobby said:
    << The 1954 Williams is not the real deal. That card doesn't have a top white border. >>

    maurice said:
    >> That's not a white border on the top of the 1954 Topps #1 Ted Williams card. It is his name in white.

    Wait a minute... bobby said the card does NOT have a top white border -- WTF?

    ???
  • CW, Bobby was saying that the card pictured is fake because a real 1954 Topps Williams card does not have a top white border (implying he thought the card pictured does have a top white border).
  • CWCW Posts: 1,221 ✭✭✭
    ok, I think I get it now.... when he said "that card" he meant the 54 Williams IN GENERAL, not the one in the photo.

    Thanks for clearing it up!
  • bobbyw8469bobbyw8469 Posts: 7,139 ✭✭✭
    Wow...I didn't realize this was so confusing. I thought the card in the picture was fake, as, by the appearance of the card, it looks as though it has a white top border and everyone (at least I hope everyone) knows that 1954 Topps cards do not have top borders.

    Did anyone notice the football card in the picture?


  • << <i>

    Did anyone notice the football card in the picture? >>



    I see two from 1952 Bowman......Joe Perry and John Badaczewski.


  • << <i>Did anyone notice the football card in the picture? >>



    I see 3 football cards in the picture: a 1952 Bowman Large (middle left edge), a 1953 Bowman (close to the left edge, a few cards above the 1952 Bowman Large), and a 1951 Bowman (below the top of the bat).

    There's also a few non-sports cards: a 1952 Topps Wings card (between the 1953 Bowman and 1952 Bowman Large football cards), and as was pointed out earlier by maddux69 there is a 1952 Topps Look 'N See card (near the kid's left knee).
  • The one below the bat is 1952 Bowman, Joe Perry.


  • << <i>The one below the bat is 1952 Bowman, Joe Perry. >>



    Correct. My mistake. That is a 1952 Bowman Large, not a 1951 Bowman.
  • SDSportsFanSDSportsFan Posts: 5,148 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Top five things that pisses me off about this kid.
    5. He has rubber bands on two stacks of cards
    4. He hasa bat next to the cards
    3. He glued the cards in the album
    2. He has his pant legs pulled up to his knees

    and the #1 thing that pisses me off is he is wearing his cleats in the house. >>






    << <i>Ok, who will be the first to find the mantle? >>





    #6:

    He has his left foot (cleat) on top of several cards! (one of which is probably a Mantle!) imageimage

    Steve
  • grote15grote15 Posts: 29,743 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think I distinguish waht is most certainly a 1968 Milton Bradley Ryan RC in the far right corner...


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • bobbyw8469bobbyw8469 Posts: 7,139 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I think I distinguish waht is most certainly a 1968 Milton Bradley Ryan RC in the far right corner... >>



    You wanna play dumb?? I can play dumb and together, we can ruin ANOTHER good thread!! I don't have a Milton Bradley, but I DO have a 1968 Topps Nolan Ryan rookie card BVG 3 currently on Ebay. I listed it for 99 cents! You can get it on Ebay, and YOU TOO can have a card that no one knows how to catalog!!!! ROTLFMAO!!!!


  • << <i>I think I distinguish waht is most certainly a 1968 Milton Bradley Ryan RC in the far right corner... >>



    This gets my vote for Post of the Year.
  • bobbyw8469bobbyw8469 Posts: 7,139 ✭✭✭


    << <i>This gets my vote for Post of the Year. >>



    We can all play stupid and make it better!

    Anyway, like I said...I don't own a Milton Bradley, but I do have the Topps version. Here is the scan...


    image
  • itzagoneritzagoner Posts: 8,753 ✭✭
    Tim you slay me. it's like pouring more flammables on flammables. image
  • bobbyw8469bobbyw8469 Posts: 7,139 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Tim you slay me. it's like pouring more flammables on flammables >>



    He aint getting me...Im getting him! A picture is worth 1,000 words!
  • itzagoneritzagoner Posts: 8,753 ✭✭
    he already got you Bobby. he got you so good you don't even know how well he got you. but you're got. got good.
  • bobbyw8469bobbyw8469 Posts: 7,139 ✭✭✭
    I have another picture if you want to see....that would be 2,000 words...to nothing.....you got nothing.
  • Stone193Stone193 Posts: 24,438 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The card in the lower right area does appear to be the 54T Williams.

    I see a white border on top.

    I think it was Shane who says it may be a '54 SI insert cutout?

    I just looked at my 54SI and there's no Williams - and just in case there were variations to the mags, I checked the catalog and there's no Williams on the list. In fact, there's no 54T in the SI with a portrait in "that" particular angle.

    So, if that's a Williams fake? This must be a really neat photoshop job?
    Mike
  • I'd go back in time to gobble up all the 52's and kick the ass of every kid and adult who glued these babies into books!!!
    I often fantasize about building my time machine big enough for 5 cases of card saver 1's...
Sign In or Register to comment.