Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

One step closer to my goal

Comments

  • sparky64sparky64 Posts: 7,041 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Lusterlicious.

    Sorry if I missed it but what's your goal?
    Other than the obvious, like picking up super nice walkers.

    "If I say something in the woods and my wife isn't there to hear it.....am I still wrong?"

    My Washington Quarter Registry set...in progress

  • DIMEMANDIMEMAN Posts: 22,403 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wow, very nice key date Walker. What is the grade on this beautiful coin....and what is your goal?
  • MoldnutMoldnut Posts: 3,113 ✭✭✭✭
    image MS63?
    Derek

    EAC 6024
  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,718 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>image MS63? >>



    That would be one super-charged 63!! LOL

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • AnkurJAnkurJ Posts: 11,370 ✭✭✭✭
    Wow! Looks like a solid 65 and a luster bomb at that! Nice pick up! image
    All coins kept in bank vaults.
    PCGS Registries
    Box of 20
    SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
  • MoldnutMoldnut Posts: 3,113 ✭✭✭✭
    Maybe those are not hits on the sun? I don't like seeing hits like that in the prime focal areas.
    Derek

    EAC 6024
  • keyman64keyman64 Posts: 15,527 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks pretty nice, congrats! I would guess 64.
    "If it's not fun, it's not worth it." - KeyMan64
    Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners. :smile:
  • KeleragKelerag Posts: 241 ✭
    Nice coin...picture looks kinda mushy on my laptop. In hand I bet the luster really stands out. Too many hits on the sun and right fields probably keep it from gem, but still a keeper!








  • Wabbit2313Wabbit2313 Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I see a 65, very nice!!
  • breakdownbreakdown Posts: 2,251 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Luster looks tremendous. Based on the images, I think it has a shot at 65 at PCGS although those marks on the sun preclude gem for many (I believe Jim Halperin for one). Another nice coin for your set.

    "Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.

  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,718 ✭✭✭✭✭
    You guys are all pretty close. It is a 64 plus. A few marks on the sun and in the right facing field likely keep it from gem but I have seen worse gems. I think it is a nice near gem example IMHO.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,718 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>....and what is your goal? >>



    To build a complete set of MS Early Walkers--1916-1933.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,718 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Luster looks tremendous. Based on the images, I think it has a shot at 65 at PCGS although those marks on the sun preclude gem for many (I believe Jim Halperin for one). Another nice coin for your set. >>



    Thanks Brother

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • DIMEMANDIMEMAN Posts: 22,403 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I can't believe you have these beautiful Walkers in the NGC Registry...where they have the nads to give zero points to PCGS coins. Most of your coins are PCGS.....why not cross the others (or send in raw) to PCGS and do the BETTER Registry over here??? Just asking.
  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,718 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I can't believe you have these beautiful Walkers in the NGC Registry...where they have the nads to give zero points to PCGS coins. Most of your coins are PCGS.....why not cross the others (or send in raw) to PCGS and do the BETTER Registry over here??? Just asking. >>



    They give equal points for both---NGC AND PCGS---but there are a few NGC coins that I want to upgrade and, if NGC won't regrade them right, I will send them over to PCGS for proper grading. image

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • 3keepSECRETif2rDEAD3keepSECRETif2rDEAD Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>I can't believe you have these beautiful Walkers in the NGC Registry...where they have the nads to give zero points to PCGS coins. Most of your coins are PCGS.....why not cross the others (or send in raw) to PCGS and do the BETTER Registry over here??? Just asking. >>



    They give equal points for both---NGC AND PCGS---but there are a few NGC coins that I want to upgrade and, if NGC won't regrade them right, I will send them over to PCGS for proper grading. image >>



    I think it is cool that they except and give equal points to both NGC and PCGS coins in their registry...I also somewhat understand why PCGS does not return the favor image

    Erik
  • MowgliMowgli Posts: 1,219 ✭


    << <i>

    << <i>....and what is your goal? >>



    To build a complete set of MS Early Walkers--1916-1933. >>



    A very lofty goal. I'm too short for my pockets to be deep enough for that.
    In the land of the blind the one-eyed man is king.
  • DIMEMANDIMEMAN Posts: 22,403 ✭✭✭✭✭
    >>>I think it is cool that they except and give equal points to both NGC and PCGS coins in their registry...I also somewhat understand why PCGS does not return the favor <<<

    My guess would be that PCGS are generally better for the grade than ngc.image
  • lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,893 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>....and what is your goal? >>



    To build a complete set of MS Early Walkers--1916-1933. >>



    A very lofty goal. I'm too short for my pockets to be deep enough for that. >>

    Indeed. I wouldn't be happy with anything less than a 63. And a few of them, like the 19-D and 21-S, are going to be quite a challenge.
    Lance.
    Coin Photography Services / Everyman Registry set / BHNC #213
  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,718 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>....and what is your goal? >>



    To build a complete set of MS Early Walkers--1916-1933. >>



    A very lofty goal. I'm too short for my pockets to be deep enough for that. >>

    Indeed. I wouldn't be happy with anything less than a 63. And a few of them, like the 19-D and 21-S, are going to be quite a challenge.
    Lance. >>



    I buy mostly 64s. I will not go below 63.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Very nice Walker.. I agree with the grade and but for a mark or two it sure would have been a 66... Cheers, RickO

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...