I thought it must be an illusion because another "normal" slab is laying straight across it - in looking at the last few photographs this error slab is extra thick. I have not seen this before. Very unusual.
<< <i>I'm always amazed how bonded scrap is graded as how do you decide to go with MS64 instead of MS63 or MS65 >>
I've always had the same question. If I had my own grading company, I'd probably just call it "uncirculated details" or perhaps even "genuine". Nonetheless I'm sure the grade is irrelevant to the potential purchaser and doesn't factor in to the pricing equation either on a piece like this.
<< <i>Looks like it was compressed a bit like a slinky when slabbed.
I'm always amazed how bonded scrap is graded as how do you decide to go with MS64 instead of MS63 or MS65 >>
Yeah ... it seems to be somewhat arbitrary when compared with grading other errors or non-error pieces. Then again, the assigned grade is rarely a factor in pricing.
Numismatist Ordinaire See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
My wife rolls her eyes when I buy a 200 year old quarter or half dollar for a couple hundred dollars. If I brought this home for $3500, I'd be in the doghouse for, like, ever.
Comments
I have not seen this before. Very unusual.
Eric
I'm always amazed how bonded scrap is graded as how do you decide to go with MS64 instead of MS63 or MS65
Life member #369 of the Royal Canadian Numismatic Association
Member of Canadian Association of Token Collectors
Collector of:
Canadian coins and pre-confederation tokens
Darkside proof/mint sets dated 1960
My Ebay
<< <i>Looks like it was compressed a bit like a slinky when slabbed.
I'm always amazed how bonded scrap is graded as how do you decide to go with MS64 instead of MS63 or MS65
I would have graded it MS64+
Also not sure about giving it the RD designation, way too much zinc showing!!!
Michael Kittle Rare Coins --- 1908-S Indian Head Cent Grading Set --- No. 1 1909 Mint Set --- Kittlecoins on Facebook --- Long Beach Table 448
<< <i>Also not sure about giving it the RD designation, way too much zinc showing!!!
<< <i>It's not exposed. You can see scratches in the plastic on one of the photos that is over the coin. >>
Yep, now I see it.
RAD#306
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
<< <i>I'm always amazed how bonded scrap is graded as how do you decide to go with MS64 instead of MS63 or MS65
I've always had the same question. If I had my own grading company, I'd probably just call it "uncirculated details" or perhaps even "genuine". Nonetheless I'm sure the grade is irrelevant to the potential purchaser and doesn't factor in to the pricing equation either on a piece like this.
Partner @Gold Hill Coin

<< <i>Looks like it was compressed a bit like a slinky when slabbed.
I'm always amazed how bonded scrap is graded as how do you decide to go with MS64 instead of MS63 or MS65
Yeah ... it seems to be somewhat arbitrary when compared with grading other errors or non-error pieces. Then again, the assigned grade is rarely a factor in pricing.
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
<< <i>Why would you even want it, much less for $3500? >>
Because it is really cool.
I am not a buyer at that price tho .....