Options
GRADE REVEALED - Guess the Grade - 1800 Draped Bust Half Dime

Just picked this up in a trade from my regular B&M dealer. This just about completes my type set of Draped Bust coins. I know Draped Bust quarter grading much better than the half dimes so I am inquiring from you what you think it grades at and see if the grading service agrees.
Take a guess. Give your rationale. Educate me! Hint: It is a no problem coin.


Take a guess. Give your rationale. Educate me! Hint: It is a no problem coin.


Official recipient of the "You Suck" Award (Oct. 2011)
0
Comments
EAC 6024
<< <i>Looks like a VF20 to me. >>
By the way I also have an 1800 half dime for my type set (considerably higher grade and did it hurt my finances... good thing it's basically a fancy way to save for retirement). I couldn't possibly tell the variety however--it being for a type set I really did not care, and the dealer do an attribution (as he normally would on his stickers) since he bought it knowing it would go directly to me. 1800 half dime
Howland Wood winner 2005-2007
Candidate for the ANA Board of Governors 2013-2015
Great looking piece regardless of TPG opinion!
Hoard the keys.
<< <i>I would agree with the VF20 guesses.
By the way I also have an 1800 half dime for my type set (considerably higher grade and did it hurt my finances... good thing it's basically a fancy way to save for retirement). I couldn't possibly tell the variety however--it being for a type set I really did not care, and the dealer do an attribution (as he normally would on his stickers) since he bought it knowing it would go directly to me. 1800 half dime >>
Steve,
even though your link is broken, I figured out how to get to the image you intended. Yours is an 1800 LM-1 or V-1, an R-3. Supposed to be the most common die marriage for 1800 half dimes.
When found, the vast majority of these have something wrong with them, often more than one defect, with bends and damage being very common.
The 1800 is the most often found date; isn't it neat that the 8 in the date was made with two little o punches looped together?
I'd grade this piece VF-something, my own opinion from the pictures is VF22, the detail is probably 25 or better IMO but the surfaces are just a little mussed with ("long ago!") and one has to account for the smattering of little pecks about the face and neck, and elsewhere.
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
If in doubt, it always goes to the lower grade.
Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
Edit: The rationale - I think the obverse is weaker than that, but the reverse seems very strong. Blaming the difference in detail to strike differential nets me to a 30.
The flat spot on the reverse is a typical strike for the type (opposite the bust on the obverse) and does not affect the grade.
I won't post a picture of the upgrade piece because that would detract from this thread.
Rich Uhrich found me this one, which I have been happy with for a couple of years
I obviously like your coins significantly more, Roger
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
BillJones' coin and the plate coin in the Redbook have the same weak strike characteristics on the reverse.
Too many positive BST transactions with too many members to list.
This 1796 half dime was in a Fine-15, but it was net graded for obvious reasons.
Tom
type2,CCHunter.
Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners.
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
<< <i>
<< <i>I would agree with the VF20 guesses.
By the way I also have an 1800 half dime for my type set (considerably higher grade and did it hurt my finances... good thing it's basically a fancy way to save for retirement). I couldn't possibly tell the variety however--it being for a type set I really did not care, and the dealer do an attribution (as he normally would on his stickers) since he bought it knowing it would go directly to me. 1800 half dime >>
Steve,
even though your link is broken, I figured out how to get to the image you intended. Yours is an 1800 LM-1 or V-1, an R-3. Supposed to be the most common die marriage for 1800 half dimes. >>
THanks for the info and for pointing out the broken link. The correct link is 1800 half dime
(For some reason when I copied the link it came over with https: (which doesn't make sense). The forum software insists on putting http:// in front of it which just totally buggers it up. I couldn't even edit out the http://; when I saved the edit it would put it right back in again. Taking out the https:// worked though.)
Howland Wood winner 2005-2007
Candidate for the ANA Board of Governors 2013-2015
I never expected to own one, but some years back, a cull appeared on ebay and I was high bidder.
With my LM book, I was able to identify it as an 1801 LM-2.
Only a little bit of the 01 is barely visible. The bust and hair ribbon are somewhat outlined, and a couple of stars are visible.
A bit more is visible on the reverse - STATES, some clouds, a few stars, eagle's head and UM in motto.
It would be a difficult coin to photograph, as the features are only visible under certain angles of light....
First Impressions
Steve
<< <i>I said 15. It looks like I need to tighten my grading standards. >>
I'm guessing the coin got net graded. It's better than F12 based strictly on wear.
<< <i>I had some spare time tonight so I figured I would post the grade. No one got it exactly right. PCGS F-12. But that is okay, because I paid F-12 money for it and would do it again gladly.
>>
VERY easy to understand why you would willingly pay F12 money for that coin! I too like having "great for the assigned grade" coins in my collection