Home U.S. Coin Forum

Best holder for proof sets after opening.

I have a few different proof sets that I am dying to cut open. Through the plastic, I can tell they're gems and want to look at them without looking through the plastic. They're some older flat packs. I know there are several different holders for them. Anyone had luck with one over the other or know of which ones to stay completely away from? Or is cutting something like that open taboo?
Better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

jeff

Comments

  • Custom made personal holders are nice.
    I say this only because I make them.

    Regards, Larryimage
  • That sounds neat. Do you have any pics and do you sell them?
    Better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

    jeff
  • Check out my listing on the BST

    Regards, Larryimage
  • Capital brand plastic holders are very good, though some consider them relatively pricey for modern proof sets if bought new. A person can sometimes find these in good used condition for not that much money, and that would be my number one option.

    Whitman brand plastic snap holders are cheaper, but not nearly as nice as the Capital holders.

    There aren't that many other alternatives if a person wants to have the entire set in a single holder.

    There are a wide variety of single coin holders ranging from Air-Tites to snap plastic holders, down to cardboard 2x2s.
  • The capitol holders are nice. I have an empty (unfortunately) capitol holder for a 1943 proof set that has openings for both of the jeffersons that year. Bossmans stuff is really nice too.
    Better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

    jeff
  • sparky64sparky64 Posts: 7,041 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm a big fan of Air-Tites.

    These were nice.

    image

    "If I say something in the woods and my wife isn't there to hear it.....am I still wrong?"

    My Washington Quarter Registry set...in progress

  • I've seen those slabbed sets. They're great. Is it about the same cost per coin in the long run to have a set slabbed?
    Better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

    jeff
  • CoinflipCoinflip Posts: 845 ✭✭✭
    does NGC require you submit in the flatpack? or does it not matter?
    SMILEFORSOMECHANGE LLC
    RAD#306

  • sparky64sparky64 Posts: 7,041 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I've seen those slabbed sets. They're great. Is it about the same cost per coin in the long run to have a set slabbed? >>




    << <i>does NGC require you submit in the flatpack? or does it not matter? >>


    NGC dropped these a year or so ago. I don't think PCGS does these anymore either. Shame.
    I never submitted for one of these so I don't know the cost comparison or submission protocol. Sorry.

    But they are cool. image

    "If I say something in the woods and my wife isn't there to hear it.....am I still wrong?"

    My Washington Quarter Registry set...in progress

  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    much to my dismay NGC stopped using the multi-holder in late 2009/early 2010. I had several groups of coins I wanted in the holders and really liked the option. AirTites are good but the coins are kept apart from each other so from my perspective the best option is the five-coin Capital Plastic Set holder. it will allow you to replace any of the coins if you can upgrade them to make the Set nicer.
  • georgiacop50georgiacop50 Posts: 2,909 ✭✭✭✭
    Capital is certainly the most popular aftermarket proof set holder but has a few negatives:

    1)very bulky
    2) not airtight
    3) hard to evaluate grades without dissassembly
    4) despite their cost, when you go to sell sets housed in CAP-PLAS you usually get lowball offers because
    a] most folks want "original" (as issued)
    b] many sets in CAP-PLAS have seen some mishandling of the coins and exhibit more hairlines than average.
  • lcoopielcoopie Posts: 8,873 ✭✭✭✭✭
    no holders are air tight

    you might use a hard plastic holder see RedTigers post above

    I wouldn't open the holder once its in as they are very prone to hairline
    LCoopie = Les
  • I have some pics of the 64 set I want to open up but have a couple of errands to run. I'll post them later this afternoon and get some input on them.
    Better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

    jeff
  • TomBTomB Posts: 21,983 ✭✭✭✭✭
    You should read and re-read the post by georgiacop50; it is a terrific post filled with great information.
    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Capital Plastic vs. OGP...................

    1)very bulky
    Flat Pack Sets are flimsy and most envelopes(OGP) are in bad shape or aftermarket, keeping them intact and safe is difficult.
    2) not airtight
    there are enough threads about holes in the cello and broken seams in the OGP to negate this.
    3) hard to evaluate grades without disassembly
    with either one you can grade accurately if they are stored well.
    4) despite their cost, when you go to sell sets housed in CAP-PLAS you usually get lowball offers because
    a] most folks want "original" (as issued)
    b] many sets in CAP-PLAS have seen some mishandling of the coins and exhibit more hairlines than average
    the coins will sell themselves if you're selling to a collector, if you're selling to a dealer you'll be lucky to get bid no matter what the coins are stored in or what they look like.

    I think it's sort of telling when you consider that the OGP eventually changed to become Capital Plastic-esque at the end of the 1960's after a brief fling with Whitman-it is during the SMS years. the old Box Sets with their pliofilm and the newer flat pack cello medium just isn't a viable long term way to store coins and keep them safe. also, despite the negative aspects you outlined there is a positive attribute that the Capital type holder offers-----a collector can assemble the coins of his choice in the set, not limited to what often amounts to inferior Mint issues included in the original set.
  • Well. I think I'm sold on busting them out. Ultimately, my goal is to display them in a big glass case with lighting along with many other coins and having them in some kind of nice looking holder would look a h**l of a lot better than floppy flat packs. Bossman has some really nice looking holders. I'm looking forward to opening them and seeing what they look like without the cello. image Great info and input! Thanks all
    Better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

    jeff
  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,527 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Even with their negative attributes, IMO Capital holders are ideal for storing raw proof coins. The holders are durable and provide a nice presentation. They allow one to replace individual coins with upgrades as you find them over time. If you are careful in where and how you store the Capital holders, you can minimize the chances of contaminants making contact with and damaging the proof coins and can minimize the chances of the individual coins developing haze or toning. The dryer the climate and the more moderate the climate where the Capital holders are stored the more stable and protected your coins will be. Capital holders come in a variety of styles, colors and designs.

    With respect to selling coins in Capital holders, it is true that dealers view these holders and the coins therein as Widgets and thus will offer far less than bid for them, you simply do not have to sell to dealers. If your coins in these holders are really the cream of the crop (i.e. 5 gem+ DCAM proof coins from 1950), you should have them slabbed before you sell them. The extra added expense of slabbing them will be recovered many times over from the proceeds of a sale of a slabbed coin to a collector.

    I have used Capital holders over the years to house CAM and DCAM proof and SMS coins that I find one by one while hunting in the wild. Be they five coin single year proof set holders, a single coin holder or a series holder (i.e. Peace Dollar, Circulation strike Franklin half dollar or Proof Franklin half dollar holders), or a custom ordered holder (i.e. State Of Nevada CC Morgan Dollar, or 1936-1964 Proof sets holder), these holders are fun to play with and use as you find just the right coin to fill a hole (that you beam over until you find an upgrade coin, in which case the prior coin is replaced without any remorse).

    The aspect of Capital holders that I least like is the screw fasteners. Since the ends of the fasteners lie on top of and above the surface of the two clear outer sandwich layers of plastic, these holders do not stack easily or well. If you stack them they will fall down. The also take up additional storage space because of this.

    I wish that a Capital style holder could be produced with a design that allows the ends of the fasteners to be flat and to lie flat and even with the surface of the two clear outer sandwich layers of plastic. This would require that the design allow for a recess in the clear plastic in which the ends of the screw components can fit. This type of design would allow the holders to be stacked and would allow for more efficient use of storage space.

    Whitman snap lock holders are ugly, flimsy and easily break. Cointains are ok but are a pain to keep track of and store in an organized fashion. Flips are ok but you have to store them in coin boxes and can not display your coins. LOC, Dansco and Whitman slide albums are not good for storing proofs as the plastic slide poses much risk of hairlining and can cause ugly toning. Wayte Raymond pages that are placed in three ring binders have plastic slides that damage coins and the paper can cause ugly toning.

    So for proof coins that are not slabbed, Capital holders are my preferred storage container for the best examples of proof coins in my collection.

  • More great input sanction. Thanks Haven't heard the latest about Manning but hopefully it's good!
    Better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

    jeff
  • Here's one of the proof sets I was dying to crack open. Do you think they should go in a Capitol style holder or go in and get slabbed? Personally, I'm leaning towards the slabbed but I ain't the expert. ha ha. Yes, I am AWARE that it's a 64 proof set in a 42 six coin holder. Just needed something to display for pics. image The only issue on the Kennedy is a spot next to the L in Liberty.

    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    Better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

    jeff
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    you can submit those coins to PCGS and their graded "value" according to a price guide might exceed your investment but I doubt you'll ever break even.
  • If I went with their economy service, I would be about $150 in to the whole thing. Hard to say what the future holds on any coin. Could go up, down or sideways for years. lol
    Better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

    jeff
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    even with the most generous grades from the submission and with a buyer who would pay according to the PCGS price guide you'll lose money, and holding onto common coins like these for ___years with hopes for price appreciation is pretty much a pipe dream. certainly you can do as you want and submit the coins, we all need to follow our own thoughts and learn in accordance with the results. perhaps you should consider the original idea you had, purchase an aftermarket holder for these coins and use the balance of the $150 grading fees you'll save for something else.
  • I could spend the extra money on more coins. image Just a really nice set and thought maybe slabbing would be best but you're right, from a cost effective point of view, the numbers aren't there.
    Better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

    jeff

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file