What are the top 3 toughest P mint Buffalo Nickels?

In XF or AU condition...Full Horn...Bold date
1913 I?
1913 II?
1914?
1915?
1916?
1917?
1918?
1919?
1920?
1921?
1923?
Disregard varieties like 1914,4 over 3 or 1916,DblDie Obv. in your consideration. I have my list of toughest top 3 from the dates listed above.What is yours?
1913 I?
1913 II?
1914?
1915?
1916?
1917?
1918?
1919?
1920?
1921?
1923?
Disregard varieties like 1914,4 over 3 or 1916,DblDie Obv. in your consideration. I have my list of toughest top 3 from the dates listed above.What is yours?
Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.
0
Comments
1. 1923
2. 1920
3. 1918 then 1917.
JMO - not an expert or even an amateur on these.
Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.
Hoard the keys.
Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.
Buffalo Nickel Digital Album
Toned Buffalo Date SetDigital Album
<< <i>Not my area, so I will guess. In my quest-some 30 years ago- I found a 1925 to be very tough.
1. 1923
2. 1920
3. 1918 then 1917.
>>
Perceptive, and pretty darned accurate. I go along with other posts that cite 1925 and 1921, too.
Incidentally, I've never quite understood references to proliferations in "XF and AU grades." David Lange does that a lot in his buffalo nickel book. It seems to me that whatever is available in MS, would pretty much have the same availability in circulated grades.
The challenge really is in finding,say,a full horn bold date,no problem original 1918 example for one's collection.It's a "tough" date in Buffalo Nickels if even the Philly is hard to find nice.
Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.
2. 1921
3. 1924
Jim
Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.
"Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.
Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.
I suppose I should not respond mainly because it would not help- But I am mainly because there is a counter theory to this which is sort of about hoards and personal experience. I suppose that based upon the results, my experience is contrary and i would vote first for 1915 followed by 1921 then by 1917
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
<< <i>What a great question-
I suppose I should not respond mainly because it would not help- But I am mainly because there is a counter theory to this which is sort of about hoards and personal experience. I suppose that based upon the results, my experience is contrary and i would vote first for 1915 followed by 1921 then by 1917 >>
The 1915 hasn't been to difficult for me, but the 1917 is indeed very underappreciated. I considered it in place of the 1925.
<< <i>I always thought 1918 was a tough date. Still don't have one that I like. >>
Would you find this one acceptable?
KILLER!!!
Buff like gyocomgd's '18 is hard to find at any price.
The '18 I bought last show is a well-struck XF/AU and I am very happy with it.I'm going to try to make a decent image of it to post here later.
Anyone have image of a nice '21 to post?
Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.