Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

What do you think NGC graded this GSA? (Grade posted...)

FadeToBlackFadeToBlack Posts: 7,847 ✭✭✭✭✭
in U.S. Coin Forum
And what would you grade it? Common date and all, but still...

image
image

image

Comments

  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,929 ✭✭✭✭✭
    MS63 max.
    Edited, was rushed for time. I'll say that these dollars from this date/mint come hammered. This is not
    one of those. Well used obverse and reverse dies. I'll deduct one point just because it falls under the
    norm.
    bobimage
    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • PlacidPlacid Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭
    64
  • DennisHDennisH Posts: 14,010 ✭✭✭✭✭
    MS62
    When in doubt, don't.
  • KoveKove Posts: 2,038 ✭✭✭✭
    62 cheek + 65 fields = MS 63
  • TallGuyTallGuy Posts: 122 ✭✭
    62 for long mark on the cheek
    "Can't never Could!"
  • nencoinnencoin Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭✭
    63+
    Northeastcoin.com
  • ModCrewmanModCrewman Posts: 4,041 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Don't know about NGC but I'd call it a 64.
  • Type2Type2 Posts: 13,985 ✭✭✭✭✭
    63/4 Max if any higher it was a gift. Gifts are good. image


    Hoard the keys.
  • BustHalfBrianBustHalfBrian Posts: 4,191 ✭✭✭✭
    No higher than 63 at NGC. Probably 62 at PCGS.
    Lurking and learning since 2010. Full-time professional numismatist based in SoCal.
  • indeetlibindeetlib Posts: 607 ✭✭
    I would say 64.

    Judging by your preface, NGC 63 image
    indeetlib.com
  • djdilliodondjdilliodon Posts: 1,938 ✭✭
    63
  • 123cents123cents Posts: 7,178 ✭✭✭
    MS-64.
    image
  • claychaserclaychaser Posts: 4,406 ✭✭✭✭
    I'll go out there and say 65


    ==Looking for pre WW2 Commems in PCGS Rattler holders, 1851-O Three Cent Silvers in all grades



    Successful, problem free and pleasant transactions with: illini420, coinguy1, weather11am,wayneherndon,wondercoin,Topdollarpaid,Julian, bishdigg,seateddime, peicesofme,ajia,CoinRaritiesOnline,savoyspecial,Boom, TorinoCobra71, ModernCoinMart, WTCG, slinc, Patches, Gerard, pocketpiececommems, BigJohnD, RickMilauskas, mirabella, Smittys, LeeG, TomB, DeusExMachina, tydye
  • Wabbit2313Wabbit2313 Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If it got more than a 62, they owe me a BIG explanation on my 3 64's that just came back!
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • LeeBoneLeeBone Posts: 4,582 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Grading by the pics it could go a few ways...
    63, 63+, 64

    In hand for best accuracy.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • BloodManBloodMan Posts: 1,836 ✭✭✭✭✭
    NGC MS64, my grade MS63
  • LeeBoneLeeBone Posts: 4,582 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Grading by the pics it could go a few ways...
    63, 63+, 64

    In hand for best accuracy. >>



    I'll let ya look at it tomorrow. image >>



    Keep the grade covered, then we`ll see how good I am image
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭
    It should be 63, but NGC probably graded it 65.


    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • vibr0nicvibr0nic Posts: 614 ✭✭✭
    I'll guess 64.
    I like large size currency and silver dollars.
  • BodinBodin Posts: 1,022 ✭✭✭

    MS63+(NGC)
    How I pay the bills:
    https://imdb.com/name/nm1835107/
  • keyman64keyman64 Posts: 15,527 ✭✭✭✭✭
    63
    "If it's not fun, it's not worth it." - KeyMan64
    Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners. :smile:
  • poorguypoorguy Posts: 4,317 ✭
    Ugh, I have seen so many overgraded gsa Morgans from NGC in my grading opinion. Makes me wonder if they were planning a QVC special or something but it fell through and dumped a ton of them out there. I wouldnt be surprised if it is sitting in a 65 holder but even 64 is over the top and likely. I grade it a 63 max.
    Brandon Kelley - ANA - 972.746.9193 - http://www.bestofyesterdaycollectibles.com
  • jmj3esqjmj3esq Posts: 5,421 ✭
    Sixty deuce
  • Kaline6Kaline6 Posts: 345 ✭
    63
  • georgiacop50georgiacop50 Posts: 2,909 ✭✭✭✭
    64
  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,313 ✭✭✭✭✭
    63+
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,893 ✭✭✭✭✭
    You said we would be surprised. I was bracing for a really bad grade. Looks about right to me.
    Lance.
    Coin Photography Services / Everyman Registry set / BHNC #213
  • Alltheabove76Alltheabove76 Posts: 1,520 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>You said we would be surprised. I was bracing for a really bad grade. Looks about right to me.
    Lance. >>

    image
    My Liberty Caps
    My Early Large Cents
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • poorguypoorguy Posts: 4,317 ✭
    Mother of God! An accurately graded NGC GSA!!!......!!


    !

    I wish you could capitalize exclaimation points!

    Edited to add an ! at the end of the last sentence! Not this one, the one above it!

    image
    Brandon Kelley - ANA - 972.746.9193 - http://www.bestofyesterdaycollectibles.com
  • JustlookingJustlooking Posts: 2,895 ✭
    I guessed 62. If the reverse had been a tad more mark-free, 63.
    Let's try not to get upset.
  • 7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,736 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Seen a lot nicer in 62 so think that was 62-
    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 11,672 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yep, another grossly overgraded coin in the wrong holder......more koolaid, anyone?

    Successful BST transactions with 171 members. Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Yep, another grossly overgraded coin in the wrong holder......more koolaid, anyone? >>



    Grossly overgraded???


    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • 7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,736 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would not be one of the KoolAid crowd as I have no more issues with "N" than "P" overall, foreigns included. But I agree the witch hunt spectre of some of the answers a bit off-putting.
    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,758 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>It should be 63, but NGC probably graded it 65. >>



    Oh please. NGC is not that bad. It is to our (the collectors') advantage to have at least two viable grading services, and comments like this do not help that cause.

    For the record I would have said MS-63. I think that MS-62 is on conservative side unless the mark on the cheek looks worse in person.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • nagsnags Posts: 821 ✭✭✭✭
    From the photo I would have guessed 63. I don't know how you can say that 62 is over grade.
  • Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 11,672 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i> I don't know how you can say that 62 is over grade. >>


    Because it's in an NGC holder image
    Actually I would have pegged it as a 63 myself.....I thought the 'koolaid' comment would help people realize
    where I was coming from.


    Successful BST transactions with 171 members. Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • nencoinnencoin Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭✭
    Coin is undergraded as a MS62. But considering the date, it doesn't matter too much.
    Northeastcoin.com
  • BustHalfBrianBustHalfBrian Posts: 4,191 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Grade posted in OP. I disagree strongly, and think it's a solid 3 in hand. >>



    Considering you can buy 3s for just about 2 money, if you aren't happy with the grade, just flip the thing and buy a 3.

    Personally, I think NGC's grade is accurate to current standards (for once).
    Lurking and learning since 2010. Full-time professional numismatist based in SoCal.
  • TireKickerTireKicker Posts: 870 ✭✭
    I was going to say 63 with a max of 64, I was grade high.image
    All the best,

    Rob

    image

    Successful Trades with: Coincast, MICHAELDIXON

    Successful Purchases from: Manorcourtman, Meltdown
  • ColonelKlinckColonelKlinck Posts: 383 ✭✭✭
    I'd say NGC and our host are not far off in their grading of Morgans. Here is my PCGS MS62PL


    image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...