Crossover vs Crackout
Let's just say, hypothetically speaking, that I have a semi-valuable coin graded MS65 in NGC plastic.
I think this coin has a shot at MS66.
If I were to send it to PCGS and ask for a crossover, is there ANY WAY that I would get an upgrade?
I know that it is theoretically possible, but does it actually ever happen?
Anybody have a good experience?
Or should I just crack it out? Something I hate doing . . . . .
I think this coin has a shot at MS66.
If I were to send it to PCGS and ask for a crossover, is there ANY WAY that I would get an upgrade?
I know that it is theoretically possible, but does it actually ever happen?
Anybody have a good experience?
Or should I just crack it out? Something I hate doing . . . . .
0
Comments
And cracking a 65 is always a gamble.
l
It's not having what you want, it's wanting what you've got.
<< <i>If I were to send it to PCGS and ask for a crossover, is there ANY WAY that I would get an upgrade? I know that it is theoretically possible, but does it actually ever happen? >>
Yes, it does happen, but it is not the way to bet.
Coin Rarities Online
<< <i>My experience has been you have a better chance of a cross with a nice ANACS coin (not a mutually exclusive phrase), than with an NGC coin.
And cracking a 65 is always a gamble. >>
I have had the same experience the past few years with ANACS vs. NGC. As for cracking, if I am comfortable
with what I am seeing, out come the pliers. No pain, no gain.
Tom
<< <i>It happens all the time. About 27% of the time according to our host. I have had some great scores, even a an upgrade, with NGC to PCGS crossovers. I have had some that did not go that left me scratching my head. >>
27% is a generality and encompasses very common coins like generic MS62-MS65 Morgan dollars, Walkers, Buffs, Mercs, etc. which probably have a higher cross rate than the average.
My own experiences in gem 19th century type shows a cross rate in the 0-10% range...which includes stickered coins as well. Actually, I don't see any differences for stickered vs.
non-stickered gem type. My recommendations that if an NGC coin is a solid cross candidate, the only way to get decent odds is to crack it out. And in that case you better be sure the
coin has no potential problems that might result in a no grade. Just because one TPG holdered it doesn't mean the coin couldn't come back no grade. I've had it happen both ways. The
variabilities in getting a coin to cross are so plentiful that coming up with a simple rule to cover all bases is essentially impossible. Some variables have nothing to do with the coin.
Michael Kittle Rare Coins --- 1908-S Indian Head Cent Grading Set --- No. 1 1909 Mint Set --- Kittlecoins on Facebook --- Long Beach Table 448
RAD#306
https://pcgs.com/setregistry/showcase/2819
Lance.
Bought off Heritage MS-67 NGC [URL=http://s1091.photobucket.com/user/Panthersgd/media/37ngc3.jpg.html]
(cracked and sent it in raw. Came back MS-65 Secure Plus Cert # 26395215 Picture is still there
[URL=http://s1091.photobucket.com/user/Panthersgd/media/ms-65.png.html]
Sent it in again , Came back MS-66 Cert # 26506312
Then I sold it on Ebay for $150.00. new owner cracked it and got it to grade where it belongs MS-67 Cert# 27746445. Now for sale on a dealers website for $1295.00
It quarter must have changed in the holder LOL
RAD#306
At the end I have decided that the coin does not deserve a "66". NGC got it right @ 65, would be silly for me to crack it out.
But a good discussion, and thank you guys for a couple of PMs as well.
Certainly I enjoyed the hobby in the late sixties, pulling silver Washingtons from circulation and visiting the local coin shop to pick up the odd rare date. I recall (vividly) my father stopped by said coin shop (unbeknownst to me) and picked up the last coin I needed to complete my set. Maybe it was a 36-D. He did that as an "atta-boy" to me for showing the tenacity to complete a daunting project such as completing a set of Washingtons at the age of 15 or so. Funny, I loved him for doing it, but the act itself was a bit disappointing for me inasmuch as I was looking forward to mowing another yard or some such to be able to complete the set myself. Hard to explain . . . . .
But I digress. . . . . . collecting was fun back then as grading was (at my level) not so very important. Some of my stuff was "Uncirculated". Yay! Most of it I pulled from circulation.
I will say this . . . . . . I have a growing uneasiness in the hobby as a whole and where the grading game has taken us. No question is is changed forever.
My uneasiness stems from the fact that even if the reality is not there, the potential is most certainly there for favoritism. And I will leave it there before I say too much.
Again, thanks guys for all of the considered responses.
I have done the same thing a few times....."ownership adds a point" and felt it should upgrade....then, sat on it for awhile, tried to get more objective, and never sent it in as I agreed with the stated grade.
A few, however, I have done raw thinking I just wanted it slabbed, and they got slabbed a little higher than I thought.
Today, I just packaged up 2 submissions. One for crossovers (coins I don't want to risk something happening or remaining raw, just in case.....toned proof copper can be tricky sometimes, imho), and a second for raw (6 of the 8 were cracked out by me tonight....NGC and PCI slabs). I think the NGC may have actually been a little undergraded, but if they come back what they were previously graded, I am fine. The PCI would be fine in the same grade. I want to get some consistency for our sets and sometimes that means throwing good money away to get them into PCGS plastic even at the same grade.
Note: "Throwing good money away" is subjective. I had to round out my 8 coin voucher and I also felt that the coins I cracked are all solid and would do better raw where the graders aren't worried about any surprises that the plastic may cover. When I buy coins, I do try to "buy the coin, note the holder", so the only ones I may worry about are sliders and certain toned coins.
Also, I have a NGC MS66 toned IHC. I, personally, believe it should cross. I am not going to risk cracking it out though. PCGS doesn't have a MS66 for that date (1881BN) and grade and only 14 in the grade under.
I bought it for the coin and the look, so if it has to remain NGC, it will. I wish it would go PCGS (tried once for a crossover at same grade), but not willing to play the risk game.
I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment
I recently cracked a PCGS 63 PL Dollar OGH and dipped it. The dip removed some haze and improved it considerably. I sent it to NGC last week and feel it has a shot at 64 PL or perhaps better. As this was a coin I had $122 not much of a gamble.
Really, I did . . . .