I think I've got some 82's of a similar shade. No idea what happened to them or if they came from packs that way. I'd guess bleed-through from the green dye on the back when sheets were stacked.
<< <i>I think I've got some 82's of a similar shade. No idea what happened to them or if they came from packs that way. I'd guess bleed-through from the green dye on the back when sheets were stacked. >>
I think you're right. Seems more like ink than damage due to moisture. I hope
<< <i>I think I've got some 82's of a similar shade. No idea what happened to them or if they came from packs that way. I'd guess bleed-through from the green dye on the back when sheets were stacked. >>
Actually that makes more sense. I forget 1982 had green backs, so there was probably some rubbing while stacking giving the green smudges on the fronts of the underneath card.
Comments
<< <i>I think I've got some 82's of a similar shade. No idea what happened to them or if they came from packs that way. I'd guess bleed-through from the green dye on the back when sheets were stacked. >>
I think you're right. Seems more like ink than damage due to moisture. I hope
<< <i>It sounds like a rare variation, with the potential to reach $10,000. >>
Nah....that's the " brown card" you're thinking of
<< <i>I think I've got some 82's of a similar shade. No idea what happened to them or if they came from packs that way. I'd guess bleed-through from the green dye on the back when sheets were stacked. >>
Actually that makes more sense. I forget 1982 had green backs, so there was probably some rubbing while stacking giving the green smudges on the fronts of the underneath card.