Home Precious Metals
Options

Interesting Take on PMs

vprvpr Posts: 604 ✭✭✭
I'm starting to think more like this.

PMs
References: Too many to list. PM for details. 100% satisfaction both as buyer and seller. As a seller, I ship promptly and keep buyers updated.

Comments

  • Options
    In the piece, Buffett argues that bonds "should come with a warning label" right now, because interest rates aren't high enough to make up for inflation and taxes.
    I didn't think there was any inflation.
  • Options
    derrybderryb Posts: 36,212 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Go for it. Give you .80 on the dollar for your PMs. You should recover the loss in no time. image

    Give Me Liberty or Give Me Debt

  • Options
    cohodkcohodk Posts: 18,621 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Go for it. Give you .80 on the dollar for your PMs. You should recover the loss in no time. image >>



    I'll give you .80 for every dollar.imageimage
    Excuses are tools of the ignorant

    Knowledge is the enemy of fear

  • Options
    vprvpr Posts: 604 ✭✭✭
    Hir argument is very valid. The fact that PMs just sit in storage is a huge negative. I'm still trying to find investments that will benefit with higher PM prices, yet can put capital to good use. I'm not so sure that mining companies are the way to go.
    References: Too many to list. PM for details. 100% satisfaction both as buyer and seller. As a seller, I ship promptly and keep buyers updated.
  • Options
    OverdateOverdate Posts: 6,939 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Buffet's views would make sense in a reasonably free and transparent marketplace. They make no sense under a crony capitalist/socialist government that is trashing its currency to prop up the real estate and stock markets.

    My Adolph A. Weinman signature :)

  • Options
    The fact that PMs just sit in storage is a huge negative

    I consider this a positive. I like having something no one can get their hands on.
  • Options
    MilesWaitsMilesWaits Posts: 5,310 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Buffet is tainted road-kill due to his and others decision to accept the derivative protection they received.

    I would rather listen to the respected Jim Rogers snore than Buffet's predictably rancid ramblings.
    Now riding the swell in PM's and surf.
  • Options
    jmski52jmski52 Posts: 22,380 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Buffet - another hypocritical windbag, helping to pass obamacare while undermining the Keystone pipeline so that insurance costs & oil transportation costs will soak the middle class to benefit his insurance and railroad holdings. His economics are only based on the politicians that he can buy outright, or make a bargain with, at your expense and mine.
    Q: Are You Printing Money? Bernanke: Not Literally

    I knew it would happen.
  • Options
    roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,303 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think the stocks will outperform gold mantra is very long in the tooth. Dow vs. Gold Dow vs. HUI have basically gone parabolic. Is that sustainable Warren?
    How will stocks do as we enter a 120 year economic cycle bottoming in 2014? Real Estate cycle will be peaking for the last time in 2015...then 33 years down/weakness according
    to Armstrong. The period of 2016 to 2020 should be a difficult one for stocks and real estate. WB is still smarting from being told to give up his 130 MILL ounces of silver in 2006.
    But in return he got the keys to the executive washrooms at a number of major corporations and banks as well as the treasury and white house.
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • Options
    LochNESSLochNESS Posts: 4,829 ✭✭✭
    From the article: "Buffett says Berkshire holds U.S. Treasury bills only to make sure the company has quick access to cash if it is suddenly needed."

    Let us not forget this guy invested $5 Billion to save Bank of America. I know BoA does a lot more than handle banknotes but this seems awfully hypocritical IMO.

    Regardless, I actually agree with this quote. I, too only keep Treasury bills to make sure I have quick access to cash if it's suddenly needed. Unfortunately I need it every month to pay my mortgage and utility bills, and I suspect Berkshire has the same problem. I doubt their electric bill is paid with stocks.
    ANA LM • WBCC 429

    Amat Colligendo Focum

    Top 10FOR SALE

    image
  • Options
    AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,539 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wasn't that article written in Feb of 2012???

    bobimage
    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • Options
    s4nys4ny Posts: 1,562 ✭✭✭
    The US National Debt is now over $15 trillion. If you had all that gold, you
    could only pay off 60% of what the US owes.

    I am horrified to calculate that
    all the US cropland could only pay off 10% of the US debt. (using a nominal value of $4000/acre)

    Farmland and Exxon-Mobil are great assets. If you had lived in Tsarist Russia in
    1913 and had 10,000 acres of farmland close to the Polish border and also owned
    oil wells and a refinery in Baku, you might have preferred to have gold in a Swiss
    bank.
  • Options
    OPAOPA Posts: 17,104 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Wasn't that article written in Feb of 2012???

    bobimage >>



    Yes it was, and his comment: "Stocks Will Outperform Gold and Bonds," was right on the money for the time. Has he made any recent quotes?
    "Bongo drive 1984 Lincoln that looks like old coin dug from ground."
  • Options
    VanHalenVanHalen Posts: 3,814 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Buffet's views would make sense in a reasonably free and transparent marketplace. They make no sense under a crony capitalist/socialist government that is trashing its currency to prop up the real estate and stock markets. >>



    +1 image
  • Options
    derrybderryb Posts: 36,212 ✭✭✭✭✭
    "Imagine little Suzie setting the price for lemonade at her cute lemonade stand, but without any lemonade, resorting to IOU chits to keep the price down. She would become the laughing stock on the neighborhood." - Jim Willie

    Give Me Liberty or Give Me Debt

  • Options
    DrBusterDrBuster Posts: 5,308 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>The US National Debt is now over $15 trillion. If you had all that gold, you
    could only pay off 60% of what the US owes.
    . >>



    You left off about $2T....so even less than 60%.
Sign In or Register to comment.