Is failure to answer a question an admission of the questions validity?
cohodk
Posts: 19,141 ✭✭✭✭✭
Found the new topic button.
Excuses are tools of the ignorant
Knowledge is the enemy of fear
0
Comments
<< <i>Is failure to answer a question an admission of the questions validity? >>
Do you mean like answering a question with another question? I see that done here quite regularly by one poster in particular.
I don't respond to forum questions that
(1) are an attempt to change the topic at hand
(2) are an attempt to avoid commenting on the topic at hand
(3) are a response to an earlier question
(4) are an attempt to stir an uncalled for response
(5) I don't know the answer to
Sometimes I don't answer a question because I care not to argue with an idiot. And sometimes I enjoy the entertainment of arguing with an idiot.
"Interest rates, the price of money, are the most important market. And, perversely, they’re the market that’s most manipulated by the Fed." - Doug Casey
<< <i>
<< <i>Is failure to answer a question an admission of the questions validity? >>
Do you mean like answering a question with another question? I see that done here quite regularly by one poster in particular.
I don't respond to forum questions that
(1) are an attempt to change the topic at hand
(2) are an attempt to avoid commenting on the topic at hand
(3) are a response to an earlier question
(4) are an attempt to stir an uncalled for response
(5) I don't know the answer to
Sometimes I don't answer a question because I care not to argue with and idiot. And sometimes I enjoy the entertainment of arguing with an idiot. >>
This.
lol
lol
Spit it out. What's the question?
I knew it would happen.
Interesting.
Knowledge is the enemy of fear
Unless of course its a valid question such as: How many times must a chartist to be wrong on his market calls before we can rightfully say to the fundamentalist that he's nothing more than a snake charmer with gold wings, and how can we say that chartist is validly wrong in the first place when we haven't given the adequate amount of time to elapse (25+ years) in order to make a valid determination if he was actually wrong or not?
This whole concept of "wrong" when it comes to the chartist is just hocus pocus nonsense. We all know chartist are invariably always right given the proper amount of time and revisionist history telling. Come on fundy's admit it.
<< <i>Women. Truth. Idiots.
Interesting. >>
What did you expect?
Amat Colligendo Focum
Top 10 • FOR SALE
<< <i>
<< <i>Women. Truth. Idiots.
Interesting. >>
What did you expect? >>
YES or NO is my guess.
Knowledge is the enemy of fear
Interests:
Pre-Jump Grade Project
Toned Commemoratives