Check out my latest pickup!! Alot of members here (you know who you are) should enjoy it!
bobbyw8469
Posts: 7,139 ✭✭✭
Properly graded by SGC, this will be the crown jewel of my 'A' collection of rookie cards......
0
Comments
nice card
Dodgers collection scans | Brett Butler registry | 1978 Dodgers - straight 9s, homie
Looking for 1970 MLB Photostamps
- uncut
Positive Transactions - tennesseebanker, Ahmanfan, Donruss, Colebear, CDsNuts, rbdjr1, Downtown1974, yankeeno7, drewsef, mnolan, mrbud60, msassin, RipublicaninMass, AkbarClone, rustywilly, lsutigers1973, julen23 and nam812, plus many others...
Like I said earlier, nice card. I wish mine was as nice.
Dodgers collection scans | Brett Butler registry | 1978 Dodgers - straight 9s, homie
Your lack of shame and neediness of any kind of attention displays the same level of class as an E! Entertainment Reality TV Series.
Just wondering, why do you collect authenticated no-grade cards?
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
<< <i>Just wondering, why do you collect authenticated no-grade cards? >>
It allows you to get a nicer card for a fraction of the price. You can have a NM/MT card that people shy away from because of the "A" stigma associated with it. Kinda like "The Scarlet Letter" so to speak. Keeping it in my personal collection - and I rather enjoy the SGC mislabeling. It teaches me not to take the PSA board, 3rd party grading, or anything else associated with this hobby too seriously. Thank everyone for all their kind words!
<< <i>Heck of a card for a Authentic grade though, if it would grade much higher than a A, to your own point, why wouldn't you want it in a numerical holder since you already own it. >>
Well...I haven't really analyzed the card front and back with a loupe, but I am assuming that there is an issue with the card, which is why it is in the "A" holder. Doesn't matter to me, since I am collecting "A" cards. Shoot, I even thought about getting some cards with weak corners, trimming the card on purpose to make it look nm/mt, and getting it in an "A" holder for my collection. I haven't done it yet, but it would fit right in with my collection.
<< <i>
<< <i>Heck of a card for a Authentic grade though, if it would grade much higher than a A, to your own point, why wouldn't you want it in a numerical holder since you already own it. >>
Well...I haven't really analyzed the card front and back with a loupe, but I am assuming that there is an issue with the card, which is why it is in the "A" holder. Doesn't matter to me, since I am collecting "A" cards. Shoot, I even thought about getting some cards with weak corners, trimming the card on purpose to make it look nm/mt, and getting it in an "A" holder for my collection. I haven't done it yet, but it would fit right in with my collection. >>
Oh, I thought you requested the A to fit your collection. Thx
To be honest, no direction, but...
1966-69 Topps EX+
1975 minis NrMt Kelloggs PSA 9
All Topps Heritage-Master Sets
<< <i>That looks like the one that was stolen from me, pretty sure it is! I'll gladly pay for shipping if you would like to do the right thing >>
I am sorry for your loss, however, thank you for your kind words!
<< <i>Make sure when you go to flip it, you set your accidental shill just a touch higher. You don't wanna be leaving money on the table like last time. >>
Sorry Mr. Kneel Down!! Stormtrooper gave me this card! I am keeping it FOREVER!!!!!! I can get sooooo much mileage from the vermin off this board, I would be a fool to get rid of it! My ultimate "make the trolls/alts look like a fool" card! LOL...do you need to the post it again for you ????? I love it - I dont mind posting it......you can look at it and enjoy!
<< <i>Shoot, I even thought about getting some cards with weak corners, trimming the card on purpose to make it look nm/mt, and getting it in an "A" holder for my collection. I haven't done it yet, but it would fit right in with my collection. >>
Trimmed and short? Reminds me of a guy named Mo.
Looking for 1970 MLB Photostamps
- uncut
Positive Transactions - tennesseebanker, Ahmanfan, Donruss, Colebear, CDsNuts, rbdjr1, Downtown1974, yankeeno7, drewsef, mnolan, mrbud60, msassin, RipublicaninMass, AkbarClone, rustywilly, lsutigers1973, julen23 and nam812, plus many others...
<< <i>Why did you bump this thread, Bobby? You complain when posters give you grief, sometimes justified and sometimes not; however, I don't see how this is anything but instigating. >>
I did it because the trolls/alts need/deserve it!! I had a perfectly normal thread yesterday - trying to do some members a favor by alerting them of a FREE Franco Harris Meet & Greet that they might not have been aware of. Out come the trolls to attack me in that thread! What was the point in that?? So I figured, what the hey - bump THIS thread up too! This is my vindication thread! It puts the trolls/alts back in their place, where the sorely need to stay. I mean come on, how many times can one get kicked off the message boards!?!?!?!
Robb
<< <i>You can't see how a mislabeled SGC card vindicates me?? Hello?? >>
It doesn't. And it shows that you still don't understand the original MB discussion.
http://www.unisquare.com/store/brick/
Ralph
Thank heavens the SGC card didn't have any sticker residue that I couldn't remove!! Heaven forbid I try to put up a post to help people!
Fixed for ya
Needs'
1972 Football-9's high#'s
1965 Football-8's
1958 Topps FB-7-8
Your chance at "vindication" was when you sent the original 7MC Ryan RC back to PSA for re-holdering. You claimed that the card was a MB Ryan RC and based that claim on your extensive knowledge of MB cards. Others claimed the Ryan RC was in fact a mislabeled Topps Ryan RC and provided quite a bit of evidence to back up their claim. PSA disagreed with your assertion that it was a MB Ryan RC, meaning you were utterly and completely wrong.
Showing that MB cards are difficult to distinguish from their Topps counterparts simply points out your own lack of knowledge regarding the issue.
Robb
Maurice should be banned for a week and locked in a windowless 4 x 4 enclosure with an unchanged litter box.
Wonder if he'd butt heads with himself if you placed a mirror in front of him instead of a monitor...
<< <i>....I don't see the need for piling on. Rest assured, there will be other opportunities. >>
indeed. a true visionary. that's you.