I like it! Lots of meat left on that obverse! Congrats!
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
terrific new addition! for those that don't seem to appreciate the upgrade, or have trouble believing that it graded they must not understand the nuance of grading those early half cents......great piece!
Apparently the roughness is mostly planchet flaws. I like the new one much more, the old one had virtually nothing, what did exist was very blended with the rest of the coin.
I think a most of the reverse cavities are as-made, though it's hard to prove one way or another. Planchet quality control was not exactly top-notch back then.
<< <i>terrific new addition! for those that don't seem to appreciate the upgrade, or have trouble believing that it graded they must not understand the nuance of grading those early half cents......great piece! >>
Or the loose-ness of the plastic it is in. I understand the nuances of grading those and with that in mind understand why it might have been given a net grade years ago but do not think it would make a graded holder in today's market. It has the classic look of a conserved dug piece IMO and I doubt very much that those are all plachet voids. If you wanted details it is a great way to get them on a budget but I just hope the OP didn't pay graded prices no matter what the holder says.
Smoothness and lack of porosity and corrosion especially on the obverse is not indicative of a dug piece. The first example actually appears to be a bit more porous than the second, imo.
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
The original piece is in PCGS plastic, it grades as an PO1.
The second one resides in a newer ANACS holder. It is in a problem free holder, but has been silently net graded as an FA2.
I am a big fan of both coins (mostly because I was able to afford them, and at the price there is a lot of value in my opinion.) The PO1 is one of the nicest I've seen at the grade level (if such can be said for such a low grade.) The FA2 is just awesome for the grade, does another coin with a full obverse even exist at that price level?
Just got the coin certified by PCGS, straight grade FA2, I expected an AG3 since the obverse is so strong, but silently net graded FA2 is not surprising to me. Looks like PCGS thinks most of the reverse mess is also mint-made planchet flaws. I'm pleased, but honestly would prefer an AG! (Shoot, while I'm at it I might as well wish for a G4.)
I like your new coin. I would grade it Good-6 on the obverse and Poor-1 on the reverse. Fair-2 for an overall grade seems an accurate compromise. Nice upgrade!
<< <i>I like your new coin. I would grade it Good-6 on the obverse and Poor-1 on the reverse. Fair-2 for an overall grade seems an accurate compromise. Nice upgrade! >>
Comments
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
Nice upgrade, btw. Very strong obverse
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
www.brunkauctions.com
<< <i>terrific new addition! for those that don't seem to appreciate the upgrade, or have trouble believing that it graded they must not understand the nuance of grading those early half cents......great piece! >>
Or the loose-ness of the plastic it is in. I understand the nuances of grading those and with that in mind understand why it might have been given a net grade years ago but do not think it would make a graded holder in today's market. It has the classic look of a conserved dug piece IMO and I doubt very much that those are all plachet voids. If you wanted details it is a great way to get them on a budget but I just hope the OP didn't pay graded prices no matter what the holder says.
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
The second one resides in a newer ANACS holder. It is in a problem free holder, but has been silently net graded as an FA2.
I am a big fan of both coins (mostly because I was able to afford them, and at the price there is a lot of value in my opinion.)
The PO1 is one of the nicest I've seen at the grade level (if such can be said for such a low grade.) The FA2 is just awesome for the grade, does another coin with a full obverse even exist at that price level?
[/URL]
I could care less that it is corroded.
I'd take it...nice coin!
......I collect old stuff......
Too many positive BST transactions with too many members to list.
<< <i>Keep on climbing 1 grade at the time. >>
Yeah, that's probably the way it's going to go!
<< <i>Ill never understand copper grading. >>
Do you collect early copper? Anything earlier than 1838 has different standards and nuances than later coins, especially if it's made of copper.
Fair-2 for an overall grade seems an accurate compromise. Nice upgrade!
<< <i>I like your new coin. I would grade it Good-6 on the obverse and Poor-1 on the reverse.
Fair-2 for an overall grade seems an accurate compromise. Nice upgrade! >>
On the nose!