Are these official NGC images? Man, they've come a long way since their $3 lusterless and dull scans. Beautiful images of excellent coins. And pricewise?
Yes it is from NGC. Not sure as to the market pricing yet. I had enquired about such possibility given the void in imaging service and this was really their request for feedback which I appreciated on the lot which is currently there for grading.
TPGs and auction houses are the natural service providers to image coins that pass through their hands.
Now, on to the photo quality, I guess I'll be the dissenting opinion here. I think the images are just okay. One thing that I don't understand at all is why on earth they still image the coins while they are already in the holder. The only benefit of having a TPG image coins, and yes I mean only, is that they can image the coins outside of the holder at the same time they are being graded or re-holdered. That being said, PCGS images coins outside of the holder but in a very cartoonish and completely non-realistic looking manner. I get that Phil has a background in the visual arts, and he treats each coin as a little "piece of artwork" (his words not mine), but the images simply don't look like the coin at 99% of the viewing angles in hand. Now, I will say, the guys at NGC at least make the coins look like they realistically look in hand in these images you have posted.
There are many photographers here on these boards who can take just as good if not better shots than the NGC (and PCGS) ones for the $$. Among them are blu62vette, robec, lkeigwin, etc.
Zohar, I'm also curious, what size options did NGC give you? Did they give you separate obverse and reverse images at something like 600x600 pixels or larger?
I look forward to hearing more about the pricing for this service, and what all is included.
-Brandon -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~- My sets: [280+ horse coins] :: [France Sowers] :: [Colorful world copper] :: [Beautiful world coins] -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
Were any of these previously TrueView'd by chance? It would be fun to compare the different photo styles.
Like brg, I love Phil's photography, but the way the TrueViews are done too often are GlamourShots in a Polaroid world. They're great eye candy for keeping in one's personal record. But I'd much prefer something like these above for sales. I think those pics from ATS are great. They show color, they give a good idea of the luster, and seem to have good detail. I'm sure they could be a little more showy, but as a proof of record and something to be used in sales, I would much rather have these.
How would you say those pics compare to the coins in hand? Do you think they're faithful enough while hitting the coins' strong points to get a good price if they were to be used in sales?
Reason they were not taken without the holder was due to the fact these were being regraded. In the general flow I assume imaging would come in while the coin is outside holder. I received high res images (2MB each) for each side of each coin.
As an aside I think these are closer to reality in how they appeal compared with true view (which I have a couple of). True View is very appealing no doubt yet not truly reflective of coin appearance in hand.
<< <i>Like brg, I love Phil's photography, but the way the TrueViews are done too often are GlamourShots in a Polaroid world. >>
Thanks, and that's a fair criticism. There's lots of different photographic possibilities when shooting a coin without a slab in the way. It's tough to say what a customer may be expecting in an image in which case; some love the glamor shots, some love something a bit more austere. Notes from the customer help in this case, and I can easily let customers choose particular shots thanks to dropbox for example. This type of feedback is useful and helps get consistent results.
<< <i>Notes from the customer help in this case, and I can easily let customers choose particular shots thanks to dropbox for example. This type of feedback is useful and helps get consistent results. >>
This is great info, Phil. I didn't realize there was a possibility of a dialogue when it came to your images!
I am glad that TPGs are making this a key feature in their offering. This makes sense for pricier coins as price wise it would not make as much sense for lower cost pieces.
<< <i>Notes from the customer help in this case, and I can easily let customers choose particular shots thanks to dropbox for example. This type of feedback is useful and helps get consistent results. >>
This is great info, Phil. I didn't realize there was a possibility of a dialogue when it came to your images! >>
There sure is. It helps take out a lot of the guesswork, helps me learn, and keeps customers happy. I would like to photograph more thalers since I started out as a darksider, but I'm mainly focused on US coins for the most part.
<< <i>Man, they've come a long way since their $3 lusterless and dull scans >>
Yeah, I was pretty miffed after getting a large submission back that I'd paid the $3 a pop on. I could have done better with my scanner. Had I known NGC were gonna use something similar, I'd have saved the money and scanned them myself.
But surely these images cost more than the $3 tier, eh?
Comments
myEbay
DPOTD 3
TPGs and auction houses are the natural service providers to image coins that pass through their hands.
Taler Custom Set
Ancient Custom Set
Very nice coins Zohar!
How does one get a hater to stop hating?
I can be reached at evillageprowler@gmail.com
8 Reales Madness Collection
World Collection
British Collection
German States Collection
So true!
myEbay
DPOTD 3
siliconvalleycoins.com
Now, on to the photo quality, I guess I'll be the dissenting opinion here. I think the images are just okay. One thing that I don't understand at all is why on earth they still image the coins while they are already in the holder. The only benefit of having a TPG image coins, and yes I mean only, is that they can image the coins outside of the holder at the same time they are being graded or re-holdered. That being said, PCGS images coins outside of the holder but in a very cartoonish and completely non-realistic looking manner. I get that Phil has a background in the visual arts, and he treats each coin as a little "piece of artwork" (his words not mine), but the images simply don't look like the coin at 99% of the viewing angles in hand. Now, I will say, the guys at NGC at least make the coins look like they realistically look in hand in these images you have posted.
There are many photographers here on these boards who can take just as good if not better shots than the NGC (and PCGS) ones for the $$. Among them are blu62vette, robec, lkeigwin, etc.
Zohar, I'm also curious, what size options did NGC give you? Did they give you separate obverse and reverse images at something like 600x600 pixels or larger?
I look forward to hearing more about the pricing for this service, and what all is included.
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
My sets: [280+ horse coins] :: [France Sowers] :: [Colorful world copper] :: [Beautiful world coins]
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
Were any of these previously TrueView'd by chance? It would be fun to compare the different photo styles.
Like brg, I love Phil's photography, but the way the TrueViews are done too often are GlamourShots in a Polaroid world. They're great eye candy for keeping in one's personal record. But I'd much prefer something like these above for sales. I think those pics from ATS are great. They show color, they give a good idea of the luster, and seem to have good detail. I'm sure they could be a little more showy, but as a proof of record and something to be used in sales, I would much rather have these.
How would you say those pics compare to the coins in hand? Do you think they're faithful enough while hitting the coins' strong points to get a good price if they were to be used in sales?
My wantlist & references
Taler Custom Set
Ancient Custom Set
Taler Custom Set
Ancient Custom Set
<< <i>Like brg, I love Phil's photography, but the way the TrueViews are done too often are GlamourShots in a Polaroid world. >>
Thanks, and that's a fair criticism. There's lots of different photographic possibilities when shooting a coin without a slab in the way. It's tough to say what a customer may be expecting in an image in which case; some love the glamor shots, some love something a bit more austere. Notes from the customer help in this case, and I can easily let customers choose particular shots thanks to dropbox for example. This type of feedback is useful and helps get consistent results.
Radiant Collection: Numismatics and Exonumia of the Atomic Age.
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/showcase/3232
DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'
CU #3245 B.N.A. #428
Don
<< <i>Notes from the customer help in this case, and I can easily let customers choose particular shots thanks to dropbox for example. This type of feedback is useful and helps get consistent results. >>
This is great info, Phil. I didn't realize there was a possibility of a dialogue when it came to your images!
8 Reales Madness Collection
Taler Custom Set
Ancient Custom Set
<< <i>
<< <i>Notes from the customer help in this case, and I can easily let customers choose particular shots thanks to dropbox for example. This type of feedback is useful and helps get consistent results. >>
This is great info, Phil. I didn't realize there was a possibility of a dialogue when it came to your images! >>
There sure is. It helps take out a lot of the guesswork, helps me learn, and keeps customers happy. I would like to photograph more thalers since I started out as a darksider, but I'm mainly focused on US coins for the most part.
Radiant Collection: Numismatics and Exonumia of the Atomic Age.
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/showcase/3232
<< <i>Man, they've come a long way since their $3 lusterless and dull scans >>
Yeah, I was pretty miffed after getting a large submission back that I'd paid the $3 a pop on. I could have done better with my scanner. Had I known NGC were gonna use something similar, I'd have saved the money and scanned them myself.
But surely these images cost more than the $3 tier, eh?
Bumped from MS-61 to MS-62. This is a killer scarce Transylvania type and therefore a big win for me.
Bumped from MS-63 to MS-64.
Others remained at same grade.
Taler Custom Set
Ancient Custom Set