Aliens landed in my back yard and left me these.

Had a Economy submission logged in on April 11th with truviews and Varieties so pretty fast turnaround. The first coin I picked up from Wes off of ebay and he was right that it was a Dcam(My first) and came back DCAM67 which I now realize are not really worth grading unless you hit the 69. But I will use the coin as a example of the DCAM and learn. The Next 2 coins up Please guess the Grade, Both are 1957 d Misplaced D and I must admit to being surprised. Top Pop is a MS64 and I really thought 1 of these was a lock at a MS65. One graded MS64 and the other MS63. Last coin was this 1943 S Goiter Washington Quarter and is only the 8th example to be graded and mine is the only non MS Version but after searching for awhile for any example I am happy to add this one to my set VG08. Wes Got a score on his 1965 DDO and all in all it was a good submission.Enjoy Tom
<< <i>
>>
<< <i>
>>

<< <i>
>>
<< <i>

<< <i>


<< <i>

https://youtube.com/watch?v=UayFm2yCHV8
I used to be famous now I just collect coins.
Link to My Registry Set.
https://pcgs.com/setregistry/quarters/washington-quarters-specialty-sets/washington-quarters-complete-variety-set-circulation-strikes-1932-1964/publishedset/78469
Varieties Are The Spice Of LIFE and Thanks to Those who teach us what to search For.
I used to be famous now I just collect coins.
Link to My Registry Set.
https://pcgs.com/setregistry/quarters/washington-quarters-specialty-sets/washington-quarters-complete-variety-set-circulation-strikes-1932-1964/publishedset/78469
Varieties Are The Spice Of LIFE and Thanks to Those who teach us what to search For.
0
Comments
Too many positive BST transactions with too many members to list.
<< <i>Where does one look to see the missplaced mintmark on the 57-D's? >>
Above the left olive branch. I circled it in Red.
What distinguishes the Goiter?
<< <i>Congrats.
What distinguishes the Goiter? >>
Severe deterioration of the obverse die occurred due to unknown cause. Washingtons mouth and chin are flat and lack definition,the area below the jaw is sunken while the area of field in front of his Adam's apple is buckled upward. The Variety has been known for decades but is rare as few have surfaced. This is the picture of the MS 65 in coinfacts...
<< <i>
I used to be famous now I just collect coins.
Link to My Registry Set.
https://pcgs.com/setregistry/quarters/washington-quarters-specialty-sets/washington-quarters-complete-variety-set-circulation-strikes-1932-1964/publishedset/78469
Varieties Are The Spice Of LIFE and Thanks to Those who teach us what to search For.
It looks like it has hand engraved tail feather divisions like some proof 1952, proof 1953 and 1957D.
The ES gap in States seems extraordnary small for a proof.
The top arrowhead barb appears to be present. This is not obvious on usual proofs.
I heard about the 'goiter' quarters but quit looking for them long ago...good snags!
"Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen
"Seu cabra da peste,
"Sou Mangueira......."
<< <i>
I used to be famous now I just collect coins.
Link to My Registry Set.
https://pcgs.com/setregistry/quarters/washington-quarters-specialty-sets/washington-quarters-complete-variety-set-circulation-strikes-1932-1964/publishedset/78469
Varieties Are The Spice Of LIFE and Thanks to Those who teach us what to search For.
U.S. Type Set
The 1936 proof picture didn't come through. Anyhow, it is my understanding that all 1936 proofs were type A. So I woud expect all the 1936's to have a close ES. Type B was first used in 1937. I have seen 1952 proofs with a close ES, but that was due to them being a class III doubled die typE B over type A.
1968 S proofs come in at least 4 varieties. Two were proof only and two matched two different circulation styles.
Thanks for sharing.
The more I watch about the quarters, the more I find out about them.
Awhile back I just started to learn about the type B reverses, Now these.
*
<< <i>Where does one look to see the missplaced mintmark on the 57-D's? >>
Coin Club Benefit auctions ..... View the Lots
<< <i>That 1963 DCAM quarter looks most interesting.
It looks like it has hand engraved tail feather divisions like some proof 1952, proof 1953 and 1957D.
The ES gap in States seems extraordnary small for a proof.
The top arrowhead barb appears to be present. This is not obvious on usual proofs. >>
Well finally had a chance to look at my other 1963 proofs and YOU are correct in there are two different styles on the reverse, one is alot more open between the E and S the other is almost closed and the barb is different on both. Interesting. Would this be a new discovery? You always had a great eye for the Washington Quarters and have got me to look alot more closer on all mine......Enjoy tom Here is a real picture of the 1957 d this coin was stolen and shows the extra d better than any other one I have held.
<< <i>
I used to be famous now I just collect coins.
Link to My Registry Set.
https://pcgs.com/setregistry/quarters/washington-quarters-specialty-sets/washington-quarters-complete-variety-set-circulation-strikes-1932-1964/publishedset/78469
Varieties Are The Spice Of LIFE and Thanks to Those who teach us what to search For.
It looks like it has hand engraved tail feather divisions like some proof 1952, proof 1953 and 1957D.
The ES gap in States seems extraordnary small for a proof.
The top arrowhead barb appears to be present. This is not obvious on usual proofs. >>
Well finally had a chance to look at my other 1963 proofs and YOU are correct in there are two different styles on the reverse, one is alot more open between the E and S the other is almost closed and the barb is different on both. Interesting. Would this be a new discovery? You always had a great eye for the Washington Quarters and have got me to look alot more closer on all mine......Enjoy tom Here is a real picture of the 1957 d this coin was stolen and shows the extra d better than any other one I have held.>>
Your 1963 proof coin is a new discovery to me. With the exception of 1952 and 1968S, I have not studied many proofs. I do have a single 1938 and 1942 proof. The tailfeather area is quite smooth on these two. Maybe it was due to polishing of late die state dies. Does anybody have an early proof that is sharp in this area?
1tommy has confirmed that the tailfeather divisions are the normal incuse on his 1963. I can't tell the difference between relief and incuse from a picture.