Opinions needed on how to proceed on a grossly misrepresented auction
![maddux69](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/userpics/505/nUG2P59B1YP8L.jpeg)
Recently I won a lot from an auction house, which will remain nameless at this time, and upon receiving the item it was far from what I thought it to be. The 1950's card I received looked very dull in appearance with brown/smeared blue ink borders and also used for bb gun practice. At first, I chalked it up to purely my mistake as I may have been confused since 10 days have passed since said auction. Now, just over a week later as I have had a chance to settle in and take stock of my recent pickups, I re-evaluate the situation. I take a look at the auction and the images posted and the difference is staggering. The borders in the image are bright white, the card presents very well and it only shows very minor surface issues/creasing. I understand that I should have realized all of this right from the start and if I take a hit so be it. My question is, should I even attempt to contact the auction house to point out this gross misrepresentation and what can I expect as far as similar experiences others may have had?
0
Comments
https://kennerstartinglineup.blogspot.com/
<< <i>If it is Lew Lipsett, prepare to be blocked from future auctions. >>
If the gentleman misrepresents his product, is difficult to get along with, and is generally a scoundrel why would this be a problem?
http://www.unisquare.com/store/brick/
Ralph
<< <i>If the gentleman misrepresents his product, is difficult to get along with, and is generally a scoundrel why would this be a problem? >>
Because Lew Lipsett is "old school" and old school dealers handle things differently.