eBay Seller Complaint
![Sheamaster](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/authoricons/images15.jpg)
Ok, so this has now happened twice this week. I purchased a card off eBay - PSA 10, perfectly centered card pictured in the auction. And then, I get the card in the mail and it is a PSA 10, although it is a different cert # with poor centering. Nowhere in either auction did it state the card pictured may not be the same card, this is a stock photo, or anything along those lines.
The first seller gave me a small discount/refund which I can live with, but the second one was a $175 card. The reason I bought it was because of the centering and how perfect it looked. The centering on the card I received is 60/40 at best. I am pretty annoyed.
Anyone else encounter this? Thoughts?
The first seller gave me a small discount/refund which I can live with, but the second one was a $175 card. The reason I bought it was because of the centering and how perfect it looked. The centering on the card I received is 60/40 at best. I am pretty annoyed.
Anyone else encounter this? Thoughts?
0
Comments
This has never happened to me, but I would certainly question the $175 card seller if he has the listed card. If he does, you should be entitled to that card, if not you should feel free to return your card for a refund.
If ebay doesn't have a policy on this they should. This is a typical "bait and switch".
I want the card pictured, and would not be happy if I were you.
Good luck.
Joe
http://www.unisquare.com/store/brick/
Ralph
<< <i>Gem Mint should really mean 50/50 centering. That should be universal, across the board, all grading companies. Makes no sense to me, and never has, why a Gem Mint 10 can be off center, even if ever so slight... >>
Do you know how rare true 50/50 centering is? As impossible as it is to get the 10 grade, it would be impossible under that criteria. If that's important to a collector they should focus on a BGS 10 or 9.5 with 10 sub grade. I think 60/40 is reasonable but I'm not as much of a stickler on centering as others
TheClockworkAngelCollection
The term 'bait and switch" will get their attention very quickly.
Those that do not and send a diff card are guilty of fraud. period.
2 graded similarly cards are not the same.
1948-76 Topps FB Sets
FB & BB HOF Player sets
1948-1993 NY Yankee Team Sets
They call me "Pack the Ripper"
My registry sets
<< <i>Gem Mint should really mean 50/50 centering. That should be universal, across the board, all grading companies. Makes no sense to me, and never has, why a Gem Mint 10 can be off center, even if ever so slight... >>
Well, back in the pre-PSA days Beckett allowed 60/40 centering for Mint condition, but otherwise the card should be totally perfect. But...like it or not PSA is the gold standard in grading today (that is, it's the grading scale nearly everyone goes by now).
D's: 54S,53P,50P,49S,45D+S,44S,43D,41S,40D+S,39D+S,38D+S,37D+S,36S,35D+S,all 16-34's
Q's: 52S,47S,46S,40S,39S,38S,37D+S,36D+S,35D,34D,32D+S
74T: 241,435,610,654 97 Finest silver: 115,135,139,145,310
73T:31,55,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,80,152,165,189,213,235,237,257,341,344,377,379,390,422,433,453,480,497,545,554,563,580,606,613,630
95 Ultra GM Sets: Golden Prospects,HR Kings,On-Base Leaders,Power Plus,RBI Kings,Rising Stars
<< <i>Sure I know how rare 50/50 is. 35 years in this I would hope I do. The precise point of why Gem Mint 10's should be 50/50.
The back centering would have to be 50/50 too then. How many pre-1980 cards would be 10s if that were the case? 3, maybe?
<< <i>
<< <i>Sure I know how rare 50/50 is. 35 years in this I would hope I do. The precise point of why Gem Mint 10's should be 50/50.
The back centering would have to be 50/50 too then. How many pre-1980 cards would be 10s if that were the case? 3, maybe? >>
Any less than 50/50 with a 5% leeway is a 9.5. Oh wait, ...
<< <i>Ok, so this has now happened twice this week. I purchased a card off eBay - PSA 10, perfectly centered card pictured in the auction. And then, I get the card in the mail and it is a PSA 10, although it is a different cert # with poor centering. Nowhere in either auction did it state the card pictured may not be the same card, this is a stock photo, or anything along those lines.
The first seller gave me a small discount/refund which I can live with, but the second one was a $175 card. The reason I bought it was because of the centering and how perfect it looked. The centering on the card I received is 60/40 at best. I am pretty annoyed.
Anyone else encounter this? Thoughts? >>
Send it back. That is false advertising. Who is the seller?