For those of you who didn't think Rick Probstein had a following...
![bobbyw8469](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/authoricons/Richie Rich.jpg)
think again! 1953 Topps common in a PSA 8 grade....
Both of these ended on the same night, only one hour difference...
1953 Topps EDDIE ROBINSON - PSA 8 ($92.88)
1953 Topps EDDIE ROBINSON - PSA 8 ($192)
This only solidifies my position that I will no longer be selling graded cards on my own, and will be using Probstein123 and PWCC to exclusively sell my slabbed cards. And we aren't talking about subtle differences ($5 vs $10 - that would be double, but on a small dollar amount it is easier to double than a larger dollar amount). We are talking about a PSA 8 common - one selling for $100, the other selling for $200, for virtually the exact same card.
Both of these ended on the same night, only one hour difference...
1953 Topps EDDIE ROBINSON - PSA 8 ($92.88)
1953 Topps EDDIE ROBINSON - PSA 8 ($192)
This only solidifies my position that I will no longer be selling graded cards on my own, and will be using Probstein123 and PWCC to exclusively sell my slabbed cards. And we aren't talking about subtle differences ($5 vs $10 - that would be double, but on a small dollar amount it is easier to double than a larger dollar amount). We are talking about a PSA 8 common - one selling for $100, the other selling for $200, for virtually the exact same card.
0
Comments
Looking to BUY n332 1889 SF Hess cards and high grade cards from 19th century especially. "Once you have wrestled everything else in life is easy" Dan Gable
Probstein does a great job...but any card can vary on price
1948-76 Topps FB Sets
FB & BB HOF Player sets
1948-1993 NY Yankee Team Sets
But with all auctions it just depends on who is watching the item.
Dave
Barry
Why is it so difficult to admit the obvious sometimes?
<< <i>No you didn't...Bobby you are one of a kind! >>
The lower priced one is the cry baby OPs card, what did you expect him to say?
The current "johnny", "yuleni", and "Daisy" auctions should also be interesting.
<< <i>Are people really that lazy that when they are looking for a card they bid on the first one they find and that's it? They don't look for more? Of the SEVEN unique bidders on the $192, NONE of them bid on the $92.88 card? Three of those bidders bid over $92.88. None of them thought to look elsewhere? I know Probstein does a good job for sellers, but what is he providing for buyers that they are so willing to do business with him that they look nowhere else? >>
Excellent points. I wish that my bidders would treat my auctions the way they treat Probstein's. At the end of the day, you only need two people to get into a bidding war and hope that it gets personal.
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
<< <i>
<< <i>A PSA 8 is a PSA 8 >>
No you didn't...Bobby you are one of a kind! >>
Yeah, that is crazy inaccurate- and Bobby knows it.
-CDs Nuts, 1/20/14
*1956 Topps baseball- 97.4% complete, 7.24 GPA
*Clemente basic set: 85.0% complete, 7.89 GPA
<< <i>Unfortunately, with consignment auctions, the consignor may have more impact on the final price than the bidders. >>
Very well said.
<< <i>Unfortunately, with consignment auctions, the consignor may have more impact on the final price than the bidders. >>
This^^^^^^
<< <i>
Excellent points. I wish that my bidders would treat my auctions the way they treat Probstein's. At the end of the day, you only need two people to get into a bidding war and hope that it gets personal. >>
See above point. In consignment auctions you actually only need one.
<< <i>Are people really that lazy that when they are looking for a card they bid on the first one they find and that's it? They don't look for more? Of the SEVEN unique bidders on the $192, NONE of them bid on the $92.88 card? Three of those bidders bid over $92.88. None of them thought to look elsewhere? I know Probstein does a good job for sellers, but what is he providing for buyers that they are so willing to do business with him that they look nowhere else? >>
Funny isn't it?
However, I've seen more people bid on stuff where theres a less expensive BIN of the EXACT same item available.
The most recent trend I've seen is people bidding at SMR without doing a search of what recent items sold for. Its very common that recent cards of the same grade sold for half of SMR.
<< <i>
<< <i>Are people really that lazy that when they are looking for a card they bid on the first one they find and that's it?
Yes.
<<
<< A PSA 8 is a PSA 8 >>
Yeah, that is crazy inaccurate- and Bobby knows it. Yeah, that is crazy inaccurate- and Bobby knows it.
+1
<< <i>Yeah, that is crazy inaccurate- and Bobby knows it. Yeah, that is crazy inaccurate- and Bobby knows it. >>
You are right....I apoligize. My PSA 8's are really PSA 5's that have been severely overgraded. I apologize and I will try not to let it happen again!
If I had my choice and they were both priced the same, you know, because an 8 is an 8 and all
that, I'd choose the Probstein example.
If all one cares about is inputing a cert # into their registry then a PSA 8 is a PSA 8.
<< <i>You are right....I apoligize. My PSA 8's are really PSA 5's that have been severely overgraded. I apologize and I will try not to let it happen again! >>
Not what we're saying- and once again, you know that's not what we're saying.
-CDs Nuts, 1/20/14
*1956 Topps baseball- 97.4% complete, 7.24 GPA
*Clemente basic set: 85.0% complete, 7.89 GPA
Second, I think it's been very well established that the two main consignors get more. Why that is I don't know. Maybe Buyers just feel more secure they're buying from a legit source or maybe the scans help sell the cards much more.
Also, keep in mind that they both give the option of credit to the sellers that consign with them. I think that's good business, because it will attract more bidders to "buy" from him with the thinking that since they have credit they'll spend a little more since they're not spending real money anyway
TheClockworkAngelCollection
<< <i>Not what we're saying- and once again, you know that's not what we're saying. >>
You are right. There IS a difference between grades. Do I think those 8's (the two Eddie Robinson examples) are identical? No. They each have their pluses and minuses. Do I think they are similiar? Yes. I honestly don't see one as being worth $200 and the other as being worth $100. Obviously the bidders disagree.
<< <i>You are right. There IS a difference between grades. Do I think those 8's (the two Eddie Robinson examples) are identical? No. They each have their pluses and minuses. Do I think they are similiar? Yes. I honestly don't see one as being worth $200 and the other as being worth $100. Obviously the bidders disagree. >>
Sometimes those high-volume consigners just get crazy prices that are way out of line with what the card usually goes for, and it can't be completely explained away by the difference in eye appeal. I was lucky enough to be the one who sent in the '78 Topps Seaver PSA 10 in the most recent PWCC auction. Check out what it went for.
I think the chances of the same card, ending at the same time, approaching that price if the seller were little ol' me are somewhere between 0 and 0%.
-edited for grammar-
-CDs Nuts, 1/20/14
*1956 Topps baseball- 97.4% complete, 7.24 GPA
*Clemente basic set: 85.0% complete, 7.89 GPA
Shane
Snorto~
<< <i>Has anyone even implied that Rick doesn't have a following? Maybe someone has but I cannot recall any respected members saying that. >>
No one has said that. The premise as stated in the title is a strawman argument(debating a point that no one actually made).
We get it bobby.
<< <i>
Second, I think it's been very well established that the two main consignors get more. >>
Actually, no-- that hasn't been established at all.
<< <i>
<< <i>You are right. There IS a difference between grades. Do I think those 8's (the two Eddie Robinson examples) are identical? No. They each have their pluses and minuses. Do I think they are similiar? Yes. I honestly don't see one as being worth $200 and the other as being worth $100. Obviously the bidders disagree. >>
Sometimes those high-volume consigners just get crazy prices that are way out of line with what the card usually goes for, and it can't be completely explained away by the difference in eye appeal. I was lucky enough to be the one who sent in the '78 Topps Seaver PSA 10 in the most recent PWCC auction. Check out what it went for.
I think the chances of the same card, ending at the same time, approaching that price if the seller were little ol' me are somewhere between 0 and 0%.
-edited for grammar- >>
And sometimes they don't. Exhibit 'A', as it so happens, is the '78 Seaver PSA 10 that sold just before yours did.
<< <i>And sometimes they don't. Exhibit 'A', as it so happens, is the '78 Seaver PSA 10 that sold just before yours did. >>
I'd argue with you if I could.
-CDs Nuts, 1/20/14
*1956 Topps baseball- 97.4% complete, 7.24 GPA
*Clemente basic set: 85.0% complete, 7.89 GPA
No one has ever stated that Probstein does not have a following, but Bobby needed a platform on which to whine to the masses that his card (yes the lower one was Bobby's) didn't sell for as much as Probstein's, so he used that as his title.
Just had a few cards end myself with Rick,mostly autos but the few cards I did send
ended all over VCP,one was $78 over,not bad on a $ 250ish card,thanks again Rick.
Needs'
1972 Football-9's high#'s
1965 Football-8's
1958 Topps FB-7-8
Crybaby's 1961 Maris PSA 5
Probstein's 1961 Maris PSA 5
so perhaps nick is a nuke.
and the high road has forked.
<< <i>Where was your thread last week when your 1961 Maris sold for 60%+ more than Probstein's only 1 week apart? >>
Not even close....50/50 centering versus 80/20 centering. As a matter of fact, I DARE you to find a '5' with better centering than that one!......the Eddie Robinsons though are just a WEE little bit harder to differentiate. They looked virtually identical.
<< <i>I can hear the world's smallest violin playing in the background.... >>
Get over yourself.
Dodgers collection scans | Brett Butler registry | 1978 Dodgers - straight 9s, homie
Daniel LaRusso: You're the best friend I've ever had!
Mr. Kesuke Miyagi: You... pretty OK, too. Go, find balance. [chuckles]
[Daniel starts to drive away]
Mr. Kesuke Miyagi: Banzai, Daniel-san!
Daniel LaRusso: Hey, banzai!
Mr. Kesuke Miyagi: [beat; then; louder] Banzai!
Daniel LaRusso: [louder] Banzai!
Mr. Kesuke Miyagi: [shouts] Banzai!
Daniel La Russo: [shouts back] Banzai!
Bosox1976