Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Should this card have the "ST" qualifier?

HallcoHallco Posts: 3,651 ✭✭✭✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
Card was on the Joes Vintage Auction that ended last night. The card looked awesome to me until I realized some sort of hazy stain looking something on the left side of the card next to Ryan's glove. I was ready to bid fairly high until I noticed it. According to PSA grading standards, a 6 can have a minor wax stain on the back of the card. Maybe it's not a stain. I don't know. I just think I would not have been happy with it so I bowed out. Just wanted to get some other opinions! image

image

Comments

  • HallcoHallco Posts: 3,651 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Maybe someone on the night shift has an opinion?? image
  • handymanhandyman Posts: 5,384 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Just give me my rug man!
  • swartz1swartz1 Posts: 4,911 ✭✭✭
    is it worthy of an 8 without?

    NQ...


    Looking for 1970 MLB Photostamps
    - uncut


    Positive Transactions - tennesseebanker, Ahmanfan, Donruss, Colebear, CDsNuts, rbdjr1, Downtown1974, yankeeno7, drewsef, mnolan, mrbud60, msassin, RipublicaninMass, AkbarClone, rustywilly, lsutigers1973, julen23 and nam812, plus many others...
  • 53BKid53BKid Posts: 2,174 ✭✭✭
    Hallco, you should be called hawkeye. In deed, it's a stain. It looks more like a PSA8 ST, than a 6.

    HAPPY COLLECTING!!!
Sign In or Register to comment.