Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
Options

Schmidt Rookie - What would it grade?

Bosox1976Bosox1976 Posts: 8,536 ✭✭✭✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
Pretty nice card, but am not sure about the bottom edge. At first I thought it was a thumbtack hole, but now I am not sure - as there is edge damage on both front/back -- but not a hole... what do you think?

image

image

image
Mike
Bosox1976

Comments

  • Options
    handymanhandyman Posts: 5,244 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Id say 6.
    5.5-6 that chip on the bottom, who knows really. They Might say 4. But to me Id say 6.
  • Options
    Foo3112Foo3112 Posts: 1,961
    That is a VERY rough right side - I'm going to have to go with a 4. 5 if your lucky.
  • Options
    Bosox1976Bosox1976 Posts: 8,536 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Pretty natural rough cut, do you think they'd whack it that hard?
    Mike
    Bosox1976
  • Options
    orioles93orioles93 Posts: 3,464 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Id say 4-5
    What I Collect:

    PSA HOF Baseball Postwar Rookies Set Registry- (Currently 77.97% Complete)


    PSA Pro Football HOF Rookie Players Set Registry- (Currently 19.26% Complete)


    PSA Basketball HOF Players Rookies Set Registry- (Currently 6.02% Complete)
  • Options
    itzagoneritzagoner Posts: 8,753 ✭✭
    looks miscut to me. rejected.

    or the meds are heavy good today. image
  • Options
    ClockworkAngelClockworkAngel Posts: 1,994 ✭✭✭
    That's a 4.5 or 5. There also scratches or creases all over the surface
    The Clockwork Angel Collection...brought to you by Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Chase
    TheClockworkAngelCollection
  • Options
    swartz1swartz1 Posts: 4,911 ✭✭✭
    PSA 6...

    I'd rather it raw...


    Looking for 1970 MLB Photostamps
    - uncut


    Positive Transactions - tennesseebanker, Ahmanfan, Donruss, Colebear, CDsNuts, rbdjr1, Downtown1974, yankeeno7, drewsef, mnolan, mrbud60, msassin, RipublicaninMass, AkbarClone, rustywilly, lsutigers1973, julen23 and nam812, plus many others...
  • Options
    Bear48Bear48 Posts: 239 ✭✭✭
    That is a 4.
  • Options
    nam812nam812 Posts: 10,540 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>looks miscut to me......... >>



    I concur.
  • Options
    Bosox1976Bosox1976 Posts: 8,536 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I'd rather it raw... >>



    Thanks guys.... It looks nice in a binder, but not so nice blown up. I guess it will live in the binder.
    Mike
    Bosox1976
  • Options
    PiggsPiggs Posts: 1,934 ✭✭✭✭
    I'm wondering if that little notch on the bottom is due to insect damage. I had some 75 mini's when I was a kid that looked like that from some sort of bug.
  • Options
    ldfergldferg Posts: 6,739 ✭✭✭
    I'm thinking a 4 on this one.


    Thanks,

    David (LD_Ferg)



    1985 Topps Football (starting in psa 8) - #9 - started 05/21/06
  • Options
    ConstantineConstantine Posts: 2,351 ✭✭✭
    5
  • Options
    gemintgemint Posts: 6,069 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'd go with 4 or 5 depending on whether the grader in a good mood or not.
    https://ebay.com/sch/gemint/m.html?_nkw=&_armrs=1&_ipg=&_from=
  • Options
    BunkerBunker Posts: 3,926 ✭
    If not miscut I would say a 4
    image

    My daughter was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at the age of 2 (2003). My son was diagnosed with Type 1 when he was 17 on December 31, 2009. We were stunned that another child of ours had been diagnosed. Please, if you don't have a favorite charity, consider giving to the JDRF (Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation)

    JDRF Donation
  • Options
    bobbybakerivbobbybakeriv Posts: 2,186 ✭✭✭✭
    5-6 is my guesstimate.
  • Options
    Bosox1976Bosox1976 Posts: 8,536 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Grades in... any final guesses?
    Mike
    Bosox1976
  • Options
    PiggsPiggs Posts: 1,934 ✭✭✭✭
    Five
  • Options
    hhmag70hhmag70 Posts: 2,107
    BCCG 10
  • Options
    grote15grote15 Posts: 29,535 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm going to guess EX 5.


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • Options
    Bosox1976Bosox1976 Posts: 8,536 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Hold on to your hats....

    32 1 21232557 NEAR MINT 7 1973 TOPPS 615 ROOKIE 3RD BASEMEN R.CEY/J.HILTON/M.SCHMIDT
    Mike
    Bosox1976
  • Options
    hammeredhammered Posts: 2,671 ✭✭✭
    6
  • Options
    hammeredhammered Posts: 2,671 ✭✭✭
    I mean 7
  • Options
    Bosox1976Bosox1976 Posts: 8,536 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I mean 7 >>



    image
    Mike
    Bosox1976
  • Options
    itzagoneritzagoner Posts: 8,753 ✭✭
    that sure beats a poke in the eye with a sharp stick. image
  • Options
    grote15grote15 Posts: 29,535 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wow, you sure that was sent to PSA? image


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • Options
    handymanhandyman Posts: 5,244 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wow. Nice 1!!
  • Options
    nam812nam812 Posts: 10,540 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Now you just need a buyer that is looking to buy the holder and not the card. image

    Seriously, that card wasn't a 7 without the bullet hole.
  • Options
    ClockworkAngelClockworkAngel Posts: 1,994 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Hold on to your hats....

    32 1 21232557 NEAR MINT 7 1973 TOPPS 615 ROOKIE 3RD BASEMEN R.CEY/J.HILTON/M.SCHMIDT >>



    He's putting us on. That card isn't a 7 at BCCG, much less PSA

    Seriously, what was it?
    The Clockwork Angel Collection...brought to you by Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Chase
    TheClockworkAngelCollection
  • Options
    grote15grote15 Posts: 29,535 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The primary reason for my EX 5 guess was the chip on the edge but I'm guessing it looks worse blown up to 10x its normal size. As mentioned here before, graders do not typically use maginification when grading, so the chip must not have been as much of a flaw as we think after looking at the huge scans. NM 7 is definitely a generous grade, but I could certainly see this card in an EX-MT 6 holder.


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • Options
    Bosox1976Bosox1976 Posts: 8,536 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I thought it was a 6 at first too, as the rough edge looks much more "normal" in person. I started the thread because it really is a fairly attractive card in person, but blown up on a scan it is kind of an Ugly Betty.

    Had a few that could have graded higher in this sub, so I'll take the gift.
    Mike
    Bosox1976
  • Options
    Bosox1976Bosox1976 Posts: 8,536 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Well, here it is... looks marginally better in the slab:

    image

    Just got in another Schmidt, and it looks like a distant cousin of this one -- rough edge, divot, centered high, etc... any thoughts on Ugly Betty II?

    image
    Mike
    Bosox1976
  • Options
    ldfergldferg Posts: 6,739 ✭✭✭
    Lets go lucky 7. Congrats on the schmidts. One of my favs.


    Thanks,

    David (LD_Ferg)



    1985 Topps Football (starting in psa 8) - #9 - started 05/21/06
  • Options
    Bosox1976Bosox1976 Posts: 8,536 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Heh, heh. Lucky 7 is right.

    I sent this one in with the ugly 7 -- much nicer card, but no love for the 8 (this is not the raw one pictured above):

    image
    Mike
    Bosox1976
Sign In or Register to comment.