Two More High End WLHs for Auction

JBN

The first is the third 1935-S, made recently. The population had been two pieces for awhile.

The two existing pieces are in the Forsythe set and my set. Forsythe has the GBW piece.

All three examples are CACed.

1935-s PCGS MS67

The second is the recently made sixth 1943 P in PCGS MS68.

For the other five pieces:

One is in the venerable Cajun collection.
The Charles Schultz piece resides in the unmatchable LuLu short set.
The Sounder/GBW/Jack Lee piece is in the Forsythe set.
The Dawson Oskey piece (currently off the radar).
Mine.

Three pieces are CACed - Mine, the auction coin, and the Forsythe coin.

1943 PCGS MS68

I'm waiting for the eighth 1934 in PCGS MS68 to show up - its appearance will identify the last of a recent flurry of top pop WLH appearances (the tenth 45-S in PCGS MS67 is in the upcoming Legend/Morphy sale).

I wonder whether these recent high end top pop 'newbies' are a reflection of the PCGS reconsideration policy.

magikbilly

Hello,

I am surprised to see such a spot on a 68???

Eric

LanceNewmanOCC

<< <i>Hello,
I am surprised to see such a spot on a 68???
Eric >>


not these days.
.

magikbilly

<< <i>

<< <i>Hello,
I am surprised to see such a spot on a 68???
Eric >>


not these days.
. >>



I know. I was going to type "getting less surprised..." but left it off with a "?"


Eric

breakdown

Love the rim toning on your 1943. Gerald Forsythe's 43 looks to be the CoinFacts cover model and also looks very nice. Thanks as always for the updates!

Wolf359

That spot kills the coin for me.

Restoration? Or is it carbon?

magikbilly

<< <i>That spot kills the coin for me.

Restoration? Or is it carbon? >>



...or is it a 67???? I opened the pic and could not believe my eyes @ 68. And this was recently made?

Eric

DennisH

I agree with Jack... that spot ruins it for me.

MarkInDavis

<< <i>That spot kills the coin for me. >>



I agree.

magikbilly

<< <i>I agree with Jack... that spot ruins it for me. >>




Well, yes, for me too. But I find the grade more upsetting than the spot. Anyone agree this is a 68?

Eric

keyman64

I wouldn't mind having that 35-S.

Raybo

What spot?

Elcontador

Re the 43 P. The spot is probably due to an improper dip. That looks like dip residue to me. There's a speck of it also on the sun. There is also minor chatter on the upper skirt lines. It's an attractive coin, but I can't see it in a 7 or 8 holder.

I have a 1936 S MS 66 Walker that has attractive eye appeal and cleaner surfaces than this coin. It was slabbed in 1999. It's in a 6 holder because of two minor hits on the wingtip on the viewer's right. I agree with its slabbed grade. But, perhaps I should send it in.........

I have other comments which I should probably keep to myself in this matter.

magikbilly

Bumped for day crowd. 43-P = MS68??


Eric

magikbilly

Bumped for night crowd. Who see's a 43-P MS68 WLH here?
I certainly do not.

Eric

LindeDad

Really glad that's out of my price range.

Elcontador

<< <i>Really glad that's out of my price range. >>



Maybe. Maybe not. Some people might actually look at the coin before considering making a purchase.

Walkerfan

The 35-S is a TOUGH issue to find well struck up. A superb gem is a VERY RARE coin witout a doubt. I have always liked that issue, as MANY are flat.