I'm not going to speculate about the grade, but Dear God, those bands look split! I think I'd seond that in. If it graded FB, you'd be looking at a big dollar coin.
“When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.” — Benjamin Franklin
My icon IS my coin. It is a gem 1949 FBL Franklin.
Pics aren't clear enough to offer an opinion on a grade. Certainly looks like a Full Band dime!! PCGS price guide has a 64FB example listed @ 5400. But you already knew that didn't you?
<<PCGS price guide has a 64FB example listed @ 5400>>
All this time I thought 1940's Winged Liberty dimes were common in MS. Apparently 1945 dimes with FB are very uncommon. The OP's example appears to be FB IMO.
There appears to be a small bridge from possible contact, however,great defintion, maybe they would be a tad easy on this date?. I have seen one(45-P) with a definite contact bridge get the fb designation before .
<< <i>There appears to be a small bridge from possible contact, however,great defintion, maybe they would be a tad easy on this date?. I have seen one(45-P) with a definite contact bridge get the fb designation before . >>
Your logic is 180 degrees off. The higher the premium, the more rigorously the standards are enforced.
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." - Geo. Orwell
I've seen a couple of slabbed 1945 Full Band coins and none really no better than this one. I wouldn't call 90% of them FB as most appear to have faint bridges on them...at least to me. If standards were rigorously applied, there might not be any of them in existence. Also looks to have a tic on the upper diagonal band. But I also don't see the tic rule well enforced either. Certainly worth a nice premium imo.
Only a plastic slave would buy a FB coin over that coin at 10x the price. If it's in a non FB holder, it's a keeper. As a FB, I just wouldn't pay up - even for a better strike
> All this time I thought 1940's Winged Liberty dimes were common in MS. > Apparently 1945 dimes with FB are very uncommon.
The premium surprised me too. I was aware of big jumps between grades.
I wonder what the biggest jump in value for a coin that's extremely common without a special designation to the same date/mm with a special designation. Biggest I could find was a 61-D Nickel with the FS designation. MS64 is worth $1 without FS, $11500 with FS. MS65 is $5 without, $27500 with.
<< <i>> All this time I thought 1940's Winged Liberty dimes were common in MS. > Apparently 1945 dimes with FB are very uncommon.
The premium surprised me too. I was aware of big jumps between grades.
I wonder what the biggest jump in value for a coin that's extremely common without a special designation to the same date/mm with a special designation. Biggest I could find was a 61-D Nickel with the FS designation. MS64 is worth $1 without FS, $11500 with FS. MS65 is $5 without, $27500 with.
Does anything beat that? >>
Not percentage wise, but the 1953 S Franklin half in MS65 - $81.25 MS65FBL - $29,690 MS66 - $312.00 MS66FBL - $45,840. *
Based on the new added pic I would say no as well.
To respond to an earlier response to my quote, yes I would agree the higher the value the more stringent the requirement to meet the true standard,(it is or inst) but if that is the case why do some exist with he FB designation that clealry dont meet it. also confirmed by another member stating he has seen them as well.
Comments
My icon IS my coin. It is a gem 1949 FBL Franklin.
All this time I thought 1940's Winged Liberty dimes were common in MS.
Apparently 1945 dimes with FB are very uncommon.
The OP's example appears to be FB IMO.
The date is good, just some die polish around it.........
TextBands look 90%. Poor image but I see a bridge at center.
It does have a small vertical hit in the center.
Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners.
<< <i>There appears to be a small bridge from possible contact, however,great defintion, maybe they would be a tad easy on this date?. I have seen one(45-P) with a definite contact bridge get the fb designation before . >>
Your logic is 180 degrees off. The higher the premium, the more rigorously the standards are enforced.
Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.
I think the images below are way too large.....but .......it is what it is.
If standards were rigorously applied, there might not be any of them in existence. Also looks to have a tic on the upper diagonal band. But I also don't see the tic rule well enforced
either. Certainly worth a nice premium imo.
Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners.
I have a really close one too, it's a P66 I bought from Ken, and I wouldn't sell it for 5x what a 66 no Band goes for ... (10x ... maybe
Where is Ken anyway ... man I haven't seen him for a long time
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
that is just brutal since it is an obvious full band strike but just had a hard contact in the wrong spot
.
Only a plastic slave would buy a FB coin over that coin at 10x the price. If it's in a non FB holder, it's a keeper. As a FB, I just wouldn't pay up - even for a better strike
<< <i>I have a really close one too, it's a P66 I bought from Ken, and I wouldn't sell it for 5x what a 66 no Band goes for ... (10x ... maybe
Where is Ken anyway ... man I haven't seen him for a long time >>
Steelheader?
nah ... Fairlaneman ... Ken Boardman ... anyone heard from him lately?
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
I think he responded to the Registry forum about the good ole days.
<< <i>Eric, if there is a hit crossing the bands.....it definitely keeps it from being FB. >>
Agreed. Even without the hit, I would say that it has 95% full split bands and it should be worth a premium to some collectors.
> Apparently 1945 dimes with FB are very uncommon.
The premium surprised me too. I was aware of big jumps between grades.
I wonder what the biggest jump in value for a coin that's extremely common without a special designation to the same date/mm with a special designation. Biggest I could find was a 61-D Nickel with the FS designation.
MS64 is worth $1 without FS, $11500 with FS. MS65 is $5 without, $27500 with.
Does anything beat that?
<< <i>> All this time I thought 1940's Winged Liberty dimes were common in MS.
> Apparently 1945 dimes with FB are very uncommon.
The premium surprised me too. I was aware of big jumps between grades.
I wonder what the biggest jump in value for a coin that's extremely common without a special designation to the same date/mm with a special designation. Biggest I could find was a 61-D Nickel with the FS designation.
MS64 is worth $1 without FS, $11500 with FS. MS65 is $5 without, $27500 with.
Does anything beat that? >>
Not percentage wise, but the 1953 S Franklin half in MS65 - $81.25 MS65FBL - $29,690 MS66 - $312.00 MS66FBL - $45,840. *
The SLQ series also has some biggies:
1916 MS67 - $43,801 MS67FH - $123,130
1918/7 MS65 - $90,630 MS65FH - $312,500
1927S MS66 - $16,560 MS66FH - $243,750
*Prices by Numismedia.
My icon IS my coin. It is a gem 1949 FBL Franklin.
To respond to an earlier response to my quote, yes I would agree the higher the value the more stringent the requirement to meet the true standard,(it is or inst) but if that is the case why do some exist with he FB designation that clealry dont meet it. also confirmed by another member stating he has seen them as well.