Options
GTG- No cheating and thanks Legend!
bestclser1
Posts: 5,566 ✭✭✭
Great coins are not cheap,and cheap coins are not great!
0
Comments
<< <i>MS64 >>
+1
booming luster but with rim ticks and (field gouge?)
.
Ike Specialist
Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986
Lance.
What a gem!!
"Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working" Pablo Picasso
If it is graded 64....great pickup.
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
NGC registry V-Nickel proof #6!!!!
working on proof shield nickels # 8 with a bullet!!!!
RIP "BEAR"
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
At least 65 ...
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
An Indian Eagle with luster like that is always cool!!!!
Michael Kittle Rare Coins --- 1908-S Indian Head Cent Grading Set --- No. 1 1909 Mint Set --- Kittlecoins on Facebook --- Long Beach Table 448
very attractive in the photo
The luster and strike are absolutely top drawer. I would expect nothing less.
I'll say 65+
INYNWHWeTrust-TexasNationals,ajaan,blu62vette
coinJP, Outhaul ,illini420,MICHAELDIXON, Fade to Black,epcjimi1,19Lyds,SNMAN,JerseyJoe, bigjpst, DMWJR , lordmarcovan, Weiss,Mfriday4962,UtahCoin,Downtown1974,pitboss,RichieURich,Bullsitter,JDsCoins,toyz4geo,jshaulis, mustanggt, SNMAN, MWallace, ms71, lordmarcovan
<< <i>64 but I bet you squeezed a 65 out of it. >>
That was my first thought. Hard to evaluate the luster from those pics which would be a major grade determining factor at the grade level.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
While WM P-mints from this period usually (it varies slightly, but all generalizations are bad) come with strong strikes and lustre, I see more of the "headlight" effect from this year than any other. Never hurts, does it?
The slight diminuition of lustre on the upper cheek/hair curl and eagle's wing bother me, but I suck at using pictures to grade. I know I'd much rather see that in a 5 holder than the rare date walker in another current thread, but that wing thing stops me from calling it 6.
Or, to mimic the rhythms and cadences of Johnny Cochrane "If that's a four, it's a helluva score". Some friends in low places would be drooling. Did I just say that out loud?
If I were describing it, the term "scrumptious" would be part of the description.
I'd love to see it in-hand before I go look at the website and see how much I've embarrassed myself.
<< <i>I had to peak. Not telling though. Surprised this coin isn't stickered or not listed as such. >>
Since you just looked I did also
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
Where is the grade.
Please post in the original post ASAP
Ike Specialist
Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
<< <i>lots of people didn't cheat, me included
What does that even mean?
MJ
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry